Dr@g0n

Leading a healthy life is closely related to a way of life that includes the usual practice of physical activity accompanied by a healthy diet. Sports and health are closely linked. A balanced diet and sports are effective in slowing down health problems when both are a regular part of your routine. The adequate consumption of nutrients such as vitamins, minerals and proteins is essential for the normal functioning of the organism. Take a look at our selection of recipes to start building your healthy diet plan. It is recommended to follow a balanced and varied diet to lead a healthy life, although it is not always easy. Some nutrients such as proteins, calcium, vitamin C and vitamin D are key to the maintenance of good muscle, bone and joint health. Accepting life means recognizing and assuming the changes of our body and the different perspectives of it. Knowing the aspects that contribute to a good state of health and being open to discover new approaches and new habits can help us get the most out of life. Proteins are complex structures: they are formed by several smaller units called amino acids, which are linked together by chemical bonds that form a long chain. Some of these amino acids are called "essential", because being fundamental to life the human body can not produce them by itself and must be ingested with food. Our body is not able to store amino acids in the same way as carbohydrates and fats, so we need a daily intake of these that we get thanks to the proteins present in our diet. Functions of vitamins and minerals THE FUNCTION OF SOME VITAMINS AND MINERALS IN A HEALTHY LIFE Magnesium contributes to reduce tiredness and fatigue, normal energy metabolism, normal functioning of the nervous system and muscles and normal protein synthesis, among other functions. Potassium helps maintain normal muscle function and normal blood pressure, and it is especially recommended if you exercise regularly. Zinc is an element that helps protect cells from oxidative stress. Selenium, in addition to being known for its properties as a protector of cells against oxidative damage, contributes to the functioning of the muscles. Iron, vitamin C, riboflavin (vitamin B2), niacin, vitamin B6, folic acid, vitamin B12 and pantothenic acid all help the metabolism to produce normal levels of energy and fight fatigue. Calcium is a basic element of our skeleton, and contributes to the normal development of bones. The supplementary intake of calcium can contribute to maintain adequate bone health, especially in people with an intake below the optimal level. Phosphorus is responsible, among other things, for healthy bone formation.

Video title : Water Fails 2018 Content creator ( Youtuber ) :https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd07rKJ7Q0pg5ths7Pz8k8Q Official YT video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VudNBFiBwiY

With his skinny legs poking out of his cotton shorts, I watched my 4-year-old son walk across the empty street toward our neighborhood park last week. “That’s close enough,” I yelled as he made his way toward his friend playing in the grass. “Stop, Wells,” I said, growing more shrill. “You can’t go any closer!” It’s hard enough to get a little child to listen on a normal day, but try persuading him to follow directions after five days on house arrest. My son froze, a good 20 feet from his friend, and called out to his buddy, “I’m going to stand right here, Barrington, so you don’t get the virus.” I swallowed a biscuit-size lump in my throat. “Virus.” It’s a weird word to hear your pre-K child say, stranger still when you’re not entirely sure he understands what “coronavirus” means. What feels worse? Wondering if he has it. My boy’s coughing began on a Thursday night, a phlegmy, body-shaking rattle that struck him every few minutes. I kept him home from school Friday — you remember back when we still had school? — and thanks to a steady diet of O.J. and “Beat Bugs” episodes, he seemed to rally. Coronavirus headlines ticked across my browser windows as I tried to work with a kid at home, but I wasn’t alarmed enough by my own child’s hack to fully freak out until that Saturday. “Wells is on fire,” my husband said to me after our son woke up from a nap. The thermometer read 103.9. Wells was sweaty and mumbling numbers, which he’d been learning at his Montessori preschool. We packed him in the car and raced to the nearby urgent care. Two hours, a negative nasal flu test and one chest X-ray later, we learned he had pneumonia. On any other March night, that might have been it. We’d be sent home with a prescription for Amoxicillin and orders to get him plenty of fluids and rest. But this wasn’t any March night. This was a sick kid during a pandemic. The nurse practitioner came back in after his X-ray and looked at us seriously. “You know, he has the symptoms of Covid-19,” she said. “We just got the tests in. Do you want to test him?” Did we have a choice? It seems we did. The nurse practitioner said the decision was up to us because the test would be sent to a private laboratory and we’d have to pay for it. She could only guess how much it might cost, but put it in the ballpark of $200. My husband and I looked at each other and silently did the math. We could make it work. We know how fortunate we are. We have medical insurance through my husband’s job as a public school teacher. We have an extended family safety net that can catch us in times of trouble. We have enough income to afford a lab bill, especially one that could help protect ourselves and our neighbors. We would do it. But almost as quickly as we agreed to the test, a look of terror took over my son’s now fully alert face. My husband gripped our son’s 40-pound body, holding his arms down as the doctor shoved a tool the size of a mascara wand up both of his nostrils. It was done in seconds, though Wells’s sobs of “Owie, Daddy. Owie!” made it sound like an hours-long ordeal. “You’ll have the results in three to four business days,” the nurse practitioner said, advising us to stay at home and keep Wells away from others. Then she put a child-size mask decorated in multi-colored smiley faces on him and ushered us out the door. Our new reality set in the next morning. The sun was shining, birds were singing, and thanks to two doses of bubble-gum-flavored antibiotics and rotating rounds of ibuprofen and Tylenol, our boy was fever-free and feeling light years better. But when Wells spotted his friends riding their scooters outside our front window, I knew the jig was up. “OK, you can stand on the porch and wave to your friends if you wear your face mask,” I told my son. Shockingly, he agreed. Maybe self-isolation wasn’t so bad, I thought, pleased with my clever parenting. Then another neighbor boy wheeled up and shouted, “Can Wells come play?” “He can’t right now,” I started, trying to decide how best to explain social distancing to another child. “Wells isn’t feeling super great and I don’t want you to catch it and not feel good, too. So can Wells just talk to you from up here?” The boy nodded, but seconds later his fruit fly attention span kicked in and he fluttered off to play. It was gut wrenching to watch my son shrug his way back into our home like a defeated Charlie Brown. And worse still when I imagined what his buddy might tell his parents.

Nick: Cum_o1_Dr@g0n Real name: Hasnain How old are you?: i am 19 Which Games you play? and for how long?(each of them): Gta5.PUBGM.CS1.6. Where are you from?(country and city): Pakistan Karachi Describe yourself(at least 50 words): I Am Really a good person,i love to help peoples if any one neeed my help i am here! And i love to do work hard i Love Cs1.6 My DReam i want to moderator and i am Respect Rules in forum i do my best here ? Note some of your qualities: i am Calm and Help players Tell us some of your defects: i dont have Had you before any kind of responsabilities(describe it): Team Of GOG On which category/categories have you been active lately?(describe your activity): Yes I am Active daily 24 hours in ts3 and 14 to 15 hours in forum Which category/project you want to care off?(choose from THIS LIST): Journaliscitcs GOG and VGR Devil Club How well you speak english?(and other languages): English,Urdu,Arabic Do you use TS3? Do you have an active microphone?: Yes Contact methods:Whatsap,Fb,Instagram Last request: This is my First Req

The Lamborghini Murciélago is a sports car produced by Italian automotive manufacturer Lamborghini between 2001[7] and 2010. Successor to the Diablo and flagship of the automaker's lineup, the Murciélago was introduced as a coupé in 2001. The car was first available in North America for the 2002 model year. The manufacturer's first new design in eleven years, the car was also the brand's first new model under the ownership of German parent company Audi, which is owned by Volkswagen. The Murciélago is designed by Peruvian-born Belgian Luc Donckerwolke, Lamborghini's head of design from 1998 to 2005.[8] A roadster variant was introduced in 2004, followed by the more powerful and updated LP 640 coupé and roadster and a limited edition LP 650–4 Roadster. The final variation to wear the Murciélago nameplate was the LP 670–4 SuperVeloce, powered by the largest and final evolution of the original Lamborghini V12 engine. Production of the Murciélago ended on 5 November 2010, with a total production run of 4,099 cars.[1] Its successor, the Aventador, was unveiled at the 2011 Geneva Motor Show. The Murciélago was introduced in 2004. Primarily designed to be an open top car, it employed a manually attached soft roof as a cover from adverse weather, but a warning on the windshield header advised the driver not to exceed 100 mph (160 km/h) with the roof in place. The roof which was made of fabric could be folded and fit into a leather bag supplied with the car in order to store it in the front compartment when not in use. The designer,Luc used the B-2 the Wally yacht, and architect Santiago , Spain as his inspiration for the roadster's revised rear pillars and engine cover. The roadster weighs 29 kg (65 lb) more than the coupé due to the loss of the roof and the addition of chassis reinforcing components. The roadster could accelerate from 0–97 km/h (0–60 mph) in 3.8 seconds which is more than the coupé owing to the increased weight while the top speed remained the same as the coupé.[8] The SuperVeloce's 6,496 cc (6.5 L; 396.4 cu in) V12 engine generates a maximum power output 670 PS (493 kW; 661 hp) at 8,000 rpm and 660 N⋅m (487 lb⋅ft) of torque at 6,500 rpm, due to revised valve timing and upgraded intake system. The car's weight was also reduced by 100 kg (220 lb) through extensive use of carbon fibre inside and out. A new, lighter exhaust system also helps in saving weight. As a result of the extensive weight loss, the SV has a power-to-weight ratio of 429 hp/long ton. The LP 640's optional 15-inch carbon-ceramic disc brakes with 6 piston callipers came as standard equipment with the car. In its June 2009 issue, Car and Driver magazine estimated that the LP 670–4 SV is capable of accelerating to 96 km/h (60 mph) from a standing start in just 3.0 seconds and on to 161 km/h (100 mph) in 7.2 seconds.[17] Subsequent testing by Road & Track revealed a 0–60 mph (0–97 km/h) time of 3.1 seconds and a quarter mile time of 10.9 seconds at 129.4 mph (208.2 km/h).[18] Lamborghini claims a top speed of 342 km/h (213 mph) when the car is fitted with an optional smaller spoiler, or 337 km/h (209 mph) with the standard Aeropack wing.[19] According to Maurizio Reggiani, head of Lamborghini R&D at the time, the LP 670–4 SV's steering was tuned for high-speed sensitivity. The original production plan of the ultimate Murciélago was limited to 350 cars, and cost US$400,000 (before options) £270,038 in 2009. However, only 186 LP 670-4s were produced before the factory had to make room for the new Aventador production line. The chassis numbers of the total cars manufactured do not represent manufacturing order. Only 5-6 cars are known to be produced with a manual transmission.

Dolphins are being spotted in harbours, canals in Venice have never looked so clean and the temporary ban of corridas has spared the lives of a hundred Spanish bulls. Looking at the bright side of things is an admirable quality, but we should not get too carried away with the idea that COVID-19 is good for the planet. Besides the anecdotal phenomena quoted above, the collapse of mobility and economic activity induced by COVID-19 are generating meaningful short-term consequences for the environment. These include a sharp reduction in Hubei’s and Northern Italy’s air pollution levels and a likely reduction in global CO2 emissions in 2020. Rejoicing over such news rests on a short-sighted view. The interlinkages between COVID-19, energy and climate issues are so complex that we are actually looking at a mixed bag of consequences. The first element that requires attention is the link between environmental factors and the spread of the virus. Proximity between wildlife and humans in the wet market of Wuhan, a megalopolis, created favourable conditions for the spillover of a virus from one species to another, as well as for further transmission among humans. The destruction of ecosystems and illegal trade of endangered species can be blamed for bringing humans in contact with a new pathogen.[1] While the West is engaging in commendable self-criticism, China should also use this pandemic as an occasion to rethink some of its traditions and its overall approach to nature. Moreover, fine particle matters such as PM10 could be a COVID-19 vector via the boost effect.[2] Prior research had found PM10 to be a compounding factor behind the spread of measles.[3] Perhaps even more convincing is the hypothesis that chronic exposure to pollution and respiratory problems aggravate the impact of COVID-19, partially explaining the high mortality rate in Northern Italy.[4] Efforts to limit pollution could thus gain further traction as a result of this pandemic, with long-term benefits for public health. Annual premature deaths from pollution are more than 70,000 in Italy[5] and 7–8 million in the world.[6] Chinese pollutant emissions fell by 20–30 per cent in February 2020,[7] and the decrease in CO2 emissions is estimated to have been the same.[8] European Space Agency satellites also showed a drastic reduction in nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions in Northern Italy.[9] Limitations to mobility were a factor behind this reduction, as 70 per cent of NO2 emissions in the Milan area are produced by transportation.[10] More importantly, the overall economic downturn expected from COVID-19 and the reduction in global air travel will contribute to what might be the most significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the past century.[11] But the positive effects of this pandemic on local air quality and global climate are likely to be temporary. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere will remain high even if emissions temporarily fall. Moreover, when economic activity resumes, a rebound in all types of emissions is likely. As the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Executive Director Fatih Birol warned, shrinking our economies is not a sustainable way to reduce emissions.[12] The energy transition needs massive public and private investments on infrastructure and system adaptation. Storing electricity is expensive, and electrification, albeit rising, cannot cover 100 per cent of demand. Investments on clean molecules and sector coupling are lagging behind. Conventional capacity is needed as a back-up, and keeping it operational with low utilisation rates comes at a cost. R&D and innovation are going to be key. While we certainly need to limit consumerism and waste, we will ultimately need a prosperous, competitive and innovative economic system to meet the climate challenge. The argument is being made that COVID-19 marks a turning point, after which the paradigm that “the economy must come first” will and in fact should be abandoned.[13] This argument rests on confusion between measures that are sensible in an emergency and long-term visions. Sacrificing short-term profits to defend public health is the right thing to do now. The aim of the measures that are being adopted in many countries in these days is to “flatten the curve” in order to soon go back to normalcy. They are not meant to be permanent, and it is in everyone’s interest to put our economies back on track. Public pressure to do so will increase. The same confusion inspires comparisons between COVID-19 and the “climate crisis”. Why are actions to fight COVID-19 so resolute while climate action is so slow? Why are mass media focussing so much on the coronavirus?[14] While framing climate change as a crisis has its merits – as it highlights the urgency to act – it can also be misleading. COVID-19 can hopefully be managed with prompt emergency measures. Limiting global warming is a much more complex, large-scale challenge. Measures to address it have to be sustainable and effective over the long term. Going back to the effects of COVID-19 on the climate, we have seen how the positive ones will likely be temporary and a rebound in emissions is expected to follow. Let us now consider the negative effects of the crisis for the climate. Headwinds from COVID-19 have already negatively impacted the car sector and the otherwise booming battery market, in turn clouding the outlook for electric vehicles (EV) sales.[15] EV demand is also going to be negatively hit by low oil prices (also partly linked to the pandemic), which reduce the attractiveness of switching to EVs. EVs remain expensive and increasingly risk-averse consumers might opt for cheaper options until the economy recovers. Disruptions to global supply chains, namely in batteries, pose risks of a shortage in parts for EVs. China is a major battery maker and an engine for growth in the EV sector. Beijing has recently thrown its weight behind EV start-ups such as Xpeng to conquer global markets[16] but might now choose to divert money to more urgent economic needs. If start-ups go bankrupt, what could be a temporary downturn could turn into a more lasting stalemate. The solar sector is also confronted with weak demand and global value chain disruptions. Bloomberg New Energy Finance cut its forecast for global solar demand in 2020 by 16 per cent, which might translate into the first annual fall in solar capacity additions in three decades.[17] The sector is heavily reliant on Chinese demand and equipment, namely PV modules. While it is true that the long-term prospects for solar remain good and the negative impact of COVID-19 should only be temporary, it is possible that countries around the world will want to reduce their dependence on global value chains. Developing equipments and materials at home would increase reliability – but it might also increase costs. This consideration can be extended to the global economy: capitalism has been increasingly reliant on integrated, “just-in-time” value chains. As said by Laurie Garrett in a Foreign Policy article, “inventories that sat on shelves for more than a few days were considered market failures”.[18] The risks of relying on such value chains have been laid bare by COVID-19. The US and the EU (for instance by promoting European renewables champions) had already shown their willingness to change course. As a result of the pandemic, countries are going to be even more tempted to limit their reliance on global trade and increase redundancy. However, redundancy comes at a cost. The pandemic might further feed nationalism or at least the perceived need to concentrate resources to sustain the national economy, distracting effort from tackling global problems such as climate change. While the two objectives are not necessarily incompatible, carbon-intensive stimulus packages might deliver more immediate benefits than supporting early-stage clean technologies. Due to the financial pain from COVID-19, corporations might also demand bailouts, subsidies and derogations from environmental regulations. Airlines are citing the distress caused by the virus to scale down long-term efforts to fight global warming.[19] Lobbying to stop carbon taxes and a UN plan requiring airlines to offset emissions by planting trees and investing in renewables is intensifying. Airlines might have to purchase 20 per cent more carbon credits than planned over the next three years as travel bounces back.[20] Their revenues are already projected to shrink by 11 per cent this year.[21] US shale oil producers – hit by extremely low prices – are also asking for help, and in the midst of the presidential race the government is more likely to listen to them. Another negative effect is that low commodity prices will encourage wasteful use, decreasing energy efficiency. This would add to a slowdown in energy efficiency improvements already observed in recent years. According to the IEA, while global oil demand might fall by as much as 730,000 barrels a day in 2020, a sharp rebound is expected in 2021.[22] COVID-19 could also be turned into an opportunity. This has nothing to do with the short-term air pollution reduction and positive effects on habitats quoted earlier. The benefit might be more structural. First of all, there are hopes that remote working habits might become embedded, limiting travel and emissions. Secondly, the shortening of value chains, if permanent, might also contribute to saving emissions. Thirdly, a different scenario from what has been sketched earlier might materialise, and stimulus packages could be used as an opportunity to invest on the energy transition. Apart from renewables and electric grids, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage (CCS) need to be scaled up, and a new wave of spending might be targeted to that.[23] Fourthly, bailouts and subsidies could be made climate-friendly by attaching certain conditions to them. An example would be to offer tax breaks to airlines to retire polluting aircrafts in favour of cleaner ones.[24] Finally, it should be remembered that renewables were not killed by the 2008–09 economic crisis. The increased urge to rely on locally produced energy as a result of this pandemic might end up favouring renewables over imported fossil fuels. The interlinkages between COVID-19, energy and climate are complex. Various scenarios could unfold, depending on the duration of the crisis and reactions to it. Overall, it is unlikely that COVID-19 is going to be good for the planet. Reductions in local pollution and greenhouse gas emissions due to lower mobility and economic activity are only going to be temporary. They risk being entirely frustrated by the economic rebound which will hopefully take place. Shrinking economic activity is not a sustainable solution to meet the climate challenge. The medium-term impact of COVID-19 on climate and the environment is mixed, with potentially negative repercussions on the fossil fuel industry and energy transition alike. Stimulus packages could be turned into climate-friendly policies, but the likelihood that countries might focus on urgent carbon-intensive spending is high. Like every crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic offers an important lesson: we have to rethink the way we treat ecosystems and organise our urban life more sustainably. * Luca Franza is Head of the Energy, Climate and Resources Programme of the Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), Associate Fellow at the Clingendael International Energy Programme (CIEP) and Lecturer at SciencesPo-PSIA.

Nickname:Cum_o1_Dr@g0n Age:19 Link with your forum profile:https://csblackdevil.com/forums/profile/78308-cum_o1_drg0n/ How much time do you spend on our channel ts every day?:any time ScreenShot as you have over 30 hours on CSBD TS3 Server (type ''!info'' in CSBD Guard) :https://www.zinguard.net/user/5e92da60990bb92b84b373ab/info Link with your last request to join in our Team:this is my first req Last 5 topics that you made on our section:

“Clearly Define Where Your Boundaries Should Be With A Marker, You Can Use A Concealer Pencil To Create A Parameter Of Where You Don’t Want To Touch The Brows And To Mark The Point In The Brow For The Start, Middle And Finish,” She Provides. To Keep Away From Hair Breakage, Parti Recommends Gently Stretching Your Pores And Skin, Grabbing Your Forehead Hair By The Basis And Plucking In The Route Of Hair Progress With Your Tweezers. “Step By Step Is Key,” She Says, So Once You Get To The Arch Of The Forehead, Take Away One Hair At A Time And Consider Your Brows Earlier Than You Proceed To Keep Away From Overplucking. “You Might Also Want To Trim The Longer Forehead Hairs With Nail Scissors, Brush Up With A Forehead Tamer And Snip Any Hairs Poking Above The Forehead Line.” Whether You’re Making An Attempt To Keep The Color And Roots Wanting Tidy, Need To Trim Off An Overgrown Inch Or Two, Or Simply Shave It Off Utterly, It Is All Grow To Be Rather More Of A Problem Now Salons Have Closed. But Your Eyebrow Hairs Are One Other Factor To Take Care Of, And When You Like Yours Preened And Polished, You’ll Want To Take Issues Into Your Personal Arms.

The world is grappling with an invisible, deadly enemy, trying to understand how to live with the threat posed by a virus. For some writers, the only way forward is to put pen to paper, trying to conceptualize and document what it feels like to continue living as countries are under lockdown and regular life seems to have ground to a halt. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COVID-19 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At the New York Review of Books, Ali Bhutto writes that in Karachi, Pakistan, the government-imposed curfew due to the virus is “eerily reminiscent of past military clampdowns Beneath the quiet calm lies a sense that society has been unhinged and that the usual rules no longer apply. Small groups of pedestrians look on from the shadows, like an audience watching a spectacle slowly unfolding. People pause on street corners and in the shade of trees, under the watchful gaze of the paramilitary forces and the police. COVID-19 His essay concludes with the sobering note that “in the minds of many, Covid-19 is just another life-threatening hazard in a city that stumbles from one crisis to another.” Writing from Chattanooga, novelist Jamie Quatro documents the mixed ways her neighbors have been responding to the threat, and the frustration of conflicting direction, or no direction at all, from local, state, and federal leaders: Whiplash, trying to keep up with who’s ordering what. We’re already experiencing enough chaos without this back-and-forth. Why didn’t the federal government issue a nationwide shelter-in-place at the get-go, the way other countries did? What happens when one state’s shelter-in-place ends, while others continue? Do states still under quarantine close their borders? A syllabus for the end of the world The doctors asked me to take a second test, but again I tested negative. Perhaps I’m immune? The days dragged on in my apartment, in black and white, like my photos. Sometimes we tried to smile, imagining that I was asymptomatic, because I was the virus. Our smiles seemed to bring good news. My mother left hospital, but I won’t be able to see her for weeks. Marta started breathing well again, and so did I. I would have liked to photograph my country in the midst of this emergency, the battles that the doctors wage on the frontline, the hospitals pushed to their limits, Italy on its knees fighting an invisible enemy. That enemy, a day in March, knocked on my door instead. In the New York Times Magazine, deputy editor Jessica Lustig writes with devastating clarity about her family’s life in Brooklyn while her husband battled the virus, weeks before most people began taking the threat seriously: