Master_Kill

Hey, I have the same problem as you. Try to open new ¬PRIVATE WINDOW¬

Officer involved shooting during chase in St. Clair Shores, suspect hospitalized ST. CLAIR SHORES, Mich. (FOX 2) - On Jan. 28, a police chase ended on Revere Street in St. Clair Shores. The vehicle entered the street and turned around at the dead end. Then, the driver drove directly towards the officers. "He was headed to ram the police," said Jimmy Seacrist, a resident that caught the chase on his front door camera. "Police said 'stop, stop, stop' and that's when they fired." Officers fired shots at the approaching car. Seacrist saw three bullets go through the car windshield on the camera footage, but whether the driver was struck or not is unknown. The car was stopped in front of the house for at least an hour. Seacrist said police kept asking if the suspect was ok and that they have medical attention if needed. After that, the suspect slammed his car into a police cruiser and pulled into his driveway. "The driver finally got out of the car and put his hands up, but instead of going towards police, he went towards my house," Seacrist said. St. Clair Shores police said the suspect was taken into custody and taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. The reason for the chase was not disclosed. Link >>>: https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/police-chase-in-st-clair-shores-suspect-hospitalized

Happy birthday

Nick: Master_kill Real name: Coroama Ioel-Aurel How old are you?: 20 Which Games you play? and for how long?(each of them): cs... and others Where are you from?(country and city): ROMANIA / TIMISOARA Describe yourself(at least 50 words): I am calm I like to get involved in projects and work with the team I am patient and I lost my job hehe...-_- I am active on ts3 and on the forum I would have liked to be part of the csbd staff Note some of your qualities: Tell us some of your defects: each person has an effect :)) Had you before any kind of responsabilities(describe it): i was here also been a moderator here on csbd for a long time On which category/categories have you been active lately?(describe your activity): im activ to jurnalist section. Which category/project you want to care off?: https://csblackdevil.com/forums/forum/18198-journalist/ How well you speak english?(and other languages): english 60% romana 100% Do you use TS3? Do you have an active microphone?: yes i have For how long can you be active after you get accepted?(days, weeks, months, years): i cann be activ all time 3 4 hours per/day Contact methods: watsapp (0790055541) forum private msg. Last request:

A house cat’s genome is 95.6 percent tiger, and they share many behaviors with their jungle ancestors, says Layla Morgan Wilde, a cat behavior expert and the founder of Cat Wisdom 101. These behaviors include scent marking by scratching, prey play, prey stalking, pouncing, chinning, and urine marking. Cats are believed to be the only mammals who don’t taste sweetness. Cats are nearsighted, but their peripheral vision and night vision are much better than that of humans. Cats are supposed to have 18 toes (five toes on each front paw; four toes on each back paw). Cats can jump up to six times their length. Cats’ claws all curve downward, which means that they can’t climb down trees head-first. Instead, they have to back down the trunk. Cats’ collarbones don’t connect to their other bones, as these bones are buried in their shoulder muscles. Cats have 230 bones, while humans only have 206. Cats have an extra organ that allows them to taste scents on the air, which is why your cat stares at you with her mouth open from time to time. Cats have whiskers on the backs of their front legs, as well. Cats have nearly twice the amount of neurons in their cerebral cortex as dogs. Cats have the largest eyes relative to their head size of any mammal. Cats make very little noise when they walk around. The thick, soft pads on their paws allow them to sneak up on their prey — or you! Cats’ rough tongues can lick a bone clean of any shred of meat. Cats use their long tails to balance themselves when they’re jumping or walking along narrow ledges. Cats use their whiskers to “feel” the world around them in an effort to determine which small spaces they can fit into. A cat’s whiskers are generally about the same width as its body. (This is why you should never, EVER cut their whiskers.) Cats walk like camels and giraffes: They move both of their right feet first, then move both of their left feet. No other animals walk this way. Male cats are more likely to be left-pawed, while female cats are more likely to be right-pawed. Though cats can notice the fast movements of their prey, it often seems to them that slow-moving objects are actually stagnant. Some cats are ambidextrous, but 40 percent are either left- or right-pawed. Some cats can swim. There are cats who have more than 18 toes. These extra-digit felines are referred to as being “polydactyl.” VIDEO : Click.

¤ Name[/nickname]: Master_kill ¤ Age: 20 ¤ Country: Romania ¤ Occupation: Work / home ¤ A short description about you: I am good ¤ How did you found out Csblackdevil Community: I just found it ¤ Favorite games: Cs 1.6 and others.... ¤ Favorite server [community only]: Royalzm.=)) ¤ A picture of you: Neh...

Welcome

American democracy is under threat. But what is that threat, exactly? Leading Democrats, many academics, liberal commentators, and left-leaning activists agree: American democracy is in grave peril. It’s besieged on all sides, the threats culminating so far in Donald Trump’s attempt to steal the 2020 presidential election from Joe Biden. More tumult likely lies ahead. But there’s a surprising amount of murkiness about what, exactly, this peril entails — and what can and should be done about it. Several dark scenarios for the future have been posed, but each is quite different. One is the threat of a stolen election — Republicans could outright steal elections Democrats won, as Trump tried to do, perhaps enhanced by mob violence. Another is the minority rule threat, in which Republicans could consistently win according to the rules but without getting a majority of votes nationwide, due to advantages in the Senate, Electoral College, and redistricting. There has also been much discussion of the threat of voter suppression. Democrats worry that GOP policy changes making it more difficult to vote could thwart a majority’s will. Another fear is less about the way Republicans win power, but is more about what they’ll do with it. Let’s call this the irresponsible party threat. For the people with this point of view, any Republican win — even one with sweeping voter majorities — is dangerous, since a faction that does not respect democracy is influential and arguably dominant in the party. There’s a great deal of debate on just how plausible, and how worrying, each of these scenarios is. Some argue they’re all unfolding at once and are all immensely serious — and that’s part of why this problem is so difficult to solve. There’s also disagreement about root causes, most notably, on how much of the problem comes from Donald Trump personally, and how much comes from broader forces in American society or institutions. Too often, though, all this is conflated and treated as similarly urgent in what has become a thinkpiece-industrial complex about democracy’s peril, and by a liberal establishment mostly concerned with offering reasons to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans. These threats may well have a common root, but they are distinct problems that would have separate solutions. The threat of election theft Many believe that the worst, most dangerous threat to American democracy by far was Trump’s conduct after the 2020 election, leading up to his supporters storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021. In this line of thinking, the many other issues liberals care about — voter suppression laws, gerrymandering, the Senate’s rural skew, Trump’s election in the first place — pale in importance when compared to the attempted theft of 2020. Institutional biases or voter suppression might affect election outcomes on the margin. But election theft is about throwing out the results entirely. That arguably should make it the most dangerous scenario for democracy, at least in the short term, as my colleague Zack Beauchamp writes. Though the mob at the Capitol rightfully got much attention, many experts don’t think the mob itself is the main problem. “The looming danger is not that the mob will return; it’s that mainstream Republicans will ‘legally’ overturn an election,” Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt wrote at the Atlantic last year. That means stealing an election, but through institutions like election officials, legislatures, or Congress, not through brute force. Trump tried to pressure officials at all these levels to try and throw out Biden’s wins, but his efforts failed. The question is whether he, or someone else, could succeed next time. His supporters are trying to replace various GOP officials who upheld the results with hardcore believers in his narrative of election fraud, or cynics more willing to pander to such beliefs. If you believe this threat looms above all, then addressing vulnerabilities in the system is paramount. So Democrats should jump at Republicans’ offer to discuss reforming the Electoral Count Act, the antiquated law Trump tried to use to get Congress and Vice President Pence to throw out results. The specific details of said reforms will matter a great deal, but as Rick Hasen writes at Slate, it’s worth getting talks rolling, rather than scoffing at them, as some Democratic leaders have so far. But the greater threat of a stolen election might come in the states — either from partisan state officials who refuse to certify rightful results, or state legislators who block the winner’s electors. If either happens, it’s not clear the courts will intervene to set things right, since many conservatives argue states have ultimate authority over their own elections. If possible (it may not be), it would be worth trying to include protections against state election theft in Electoral Count Act reforms. But there’s no foolproof solution. The system will only work if enough people in power agree to let it work. So one key test will be in whether Republicans who stood up to Trump, like Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, can survive primary challenges. Retaining a core of elites in the Republican Party who respect democratic norms is crucially important. Much could also hinge on whether Trump himself runs again and wins the GOP nomination. Yet many Democrats, activists, and academics aren’t just worried about elections being outright stolen. They’re also concerned that Republicans could consistently win elections while lacking a majority of overall votes nationwide. This, they argue, is an affront to the core democratic principle that a majority should prevail, and to the idea that some people’s votes shouldn’t be worth more than others. Lately, many United States’s electoral institutions have given the GOP an advantage. “The GOP has dropped any pretense of trying to appeal to a majority of Americans,” writes Ari Berman of Mother Jones. “Instead, recognizing that the structure of America’s political institutions diminishes the influence of urban areas, young Americans, and voters of color, it caters to a conservative white minority that is drastically overrepresented in the Electoral College, the Senate, and gerrymandered legislative districts.” In 2020, Biden won the po[CENSORED]r vote by more than 4 percentage points, but only barely eked out a win in the tipping point Electoral College state. The median states were even a bit more tilted toward the GOP, suggesting the party has a 4- to 6-point advantage in competition for the Senate. Gerrymandering will likely continue to give the GOP a narrow advantage in the House of Representatives and far greater advantages in some swing state legislatures. And we shouldn’t forget the conservative-dominated Supreme Court, which has three justices appointed by a president who never won a majority of the nationwide vote. This is a frustrating state of affairs for Democrats, but is it a fundamental threat to democracy comparable to that of stolen elections? The US has never had a system where the po[CENSORED]r vote dictated these outcomes. Republicans (including those who criticized Trump’s attempt to steal the 2020 election) argue that they have been playing by the long-established rules of the game, and that Democrats are simply upset that they are losing. Democrats argue back that the rules are unfair because they disadvantage nonwhite voters. Whatever the arguments, there are few plausible solutions. The party’s filibustered election bill would have reformed House gerrymandering, but it left these other institutions untouched. Other proposals preferred by some on the left, such as adding new states to the Senate and packing the Supreme Court, didn’t even make the cut. The most po[CENSORED]r idea for reforming the Electoral College — a “compact” among states to give their electors to the po[CENSORED]r vote winner — isn’t going anywhere unless Democrats seize power in many more swing states. There are some arguments that these problems are surmountable without big reforms. The current round of redistricting probably won’t be as bad for Democrats as many expected in the House (some state legislatures are another story, though). And the Electoral College bias is hardly set in stone — Democrats had a slight advantage in it compared to the po[CENSORED]r vote in 2004, 2008, and 2012. Democrats’ woes there, as in the Senate, are in large part a Trump-era problem brought on by a sharp increase in the polarization of the electorate by education. Yet reversing that trend would likely require a change in the party’s political coalition. They’d have to get significantly better at appealing to the non-college-educated voters, particularly white voters, whose power is amplified by these institutions, as Democratic data guru David Shor has argued. For the foreseeable future, the conversation about reforming the Electoral College or the Senate is a dead end — no constitutional convention is coming to save us. Democrats’ only option is to try to win despite their disadvantages. The threat of voter suppression Another threat that’s gotten enormous attention from Democrats, advocates, and experts this year is voter suppression. They argue that Republicans have a longtime practice of trying to effectively trying to distort the electorate, making it harder for certain voters (especially young, poor, nonwhite, and immigrant voters) to actually cast their ballots, so the GOP can have a better shot at winning. This effort accelerated in 2021 with a set of new laws in GOP-controlled states. Some toughened voter ID requirements, some reduced the time in which mail ballots can be requested, some limited drop boxes, some made it easier to “purge” voter rolls. Republicans claim they’re simply rolling back pandemic expansions or trying to combat possible fraud, but occasionally a Republican admits these measures are aimed at helping their party win. Link > > > https://www.vox.com/22798975/democracy-threats-peril-trump-voting-rights

After 2,000 minutes of fiction and 2 burglaries, La Casa de Papel is over. Just like the romantic idea of a victimless robbery, of this struggle for freedom and resistance without hurting anyone. The last season of the series showed us the reality. And the characters had to fight for their lives. It was no longer just a brawl of ideas and moral dilemmas, it was an assault with weapons and grenades. For the first time, I saw El Profesor without a Plan B, and that changed everything radically. I don't want to spoil it here, I just want to invite you to watch the last part of the show. It will be very difficult for you to move your gaze from the screen, the story keeps our mouths shut, brings us shocking scenes and an action that always keeps us on the edge of the chair. How often do you wake up with bad guys, turning them into real heroes? Well, La Casa de Papel did that and managed to keep its promise until the end… because, spoiler alert, the story ends with a happy ending. Our crazy gang wins, they are free, smiling and with gold in their hands. These last episodes did not try to show anyone's talent, they did not want to invent anything or win prizes, they just wanted to end the story, and the answers to the choices they made are hidden in all the previous five seasons. We have sweet-bitter moments and living characters who suffer and love. We see an absolutely wonderful Najwa Nimri (Alicia Sierra), and her rivalry with El Profesor ends wonderfully, where you add that romance does not disappear even when you are caught and handcuffed. We have Palermo and its special relationship with Berlin in action. We have an end to the Denver-Stockholm-Manila triangle. Some fan theories have come true, but there have been many surprises. At Casa de Papel he managed to make us smile, although now we manage to get over the fact that we will never see them again. One of Netflix's most successful productions is over, but the producers assure us that they are preparing other equally good stories for us. 5 curiosities about the series La Casa de Papel The series starring Úrsula Corberó, Itziar Ituño or Álvaro Morte (which you can see in another fiction, this time international, in the fantasy "The Wheel of Time", from Amazon) it came to an end, but not before it brought us five episodes to fall in love with. Read also: Darko Perić's story. The actor from La Casa De Papel stayed in Romania for 9 years, is married to a Romanian woman and loves Timişoara Unlike other highly acclaimed series, I would only mention here Game of Thrones, the Spaniards who created La Casa de Papel knew how to put an end to a story that conquered an entire world. As the actors said in the press conference that preceded the launch, Money Heist has managed to connect people from all over the world, as only football does… Iberians are obsessed with football, so we should not be surprised at all. If you haven't already seen the latest episodes or if you've seen them and can't wait to find out what the people who created La Casa de Papel will do, here are five curiosities about the latest episodes, some without deaths, but full of action , upheavals, tears and smiles.

Solved. @Seuong please close topic.

[FOR SELL] [ROYALZM.CSBLACKDEVIL.COM ZP 6.2] Game: Counter Strike 1.6 Address: 51.210.27.147 Port: 27015 Current Players: 12 / 32 Average (past month):- Rank : 1471 GameTracker: https://www.gametracker.com/server_info/51.210.27.147:27015/ Ps: I'm selling them because I'm retiring. if you want to know the price give me a private message. In forum or whatsapp. 0790055541 +340 POINTS OF GTC ON GTRS FREE (*with gtc points cann boost server*)

Happy Birthday

Happy birthday!

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday!!

Happy birthday