KingSlayer

Car makers and the government are being advised to provide clearer information about electric vehicles after a recent study showed 38% of drivers know little or nothing about how much they cost to run. The survey of 2200 UK adults, conducted for World EV Day, suggested attitudes towards electric vehicles were generally positive. Two thirds (64%) of drivers said they would consider an EV for their next car. Less than half said the same about diesel. Running costs (excluding the cost of the vehicle itself) were the top priority for car buyers. In the survey, 91% said running costs were an important factor when choosing their next vehicle, and this was slightly higher (93%) among potential EV drivers, outranking environmental benefits, range and convenient refuelling or recharging. However, 53% of drivers said choosing an electric vehicle was confusing, and only 26% who are considering getting one expected running costs to be lower than for a petrol or diesel car. The results highlight some significant knowledge gaps. Less than half of those surveyed (47%) expected electric vehicles to offer a tax saving, despite EVs qualifying for zero-rate vehicle excise duty (regardless of list price) and an ultra-low 2% company car tax band, compared with at least 25% for petrol or diesel models. Even among those who said running costs were an important factor, 23% didn’t know whether electric vehicles’ servicing and maintenance costs were lower, 15% were unsure if they avoided clean air zone charges, 14% were unaware of tax incentives, and 13% didn’t know how the cost of electricity compared with petrol or diesel costs. Drivers also reported struggling with other important information. Range was the third most common influence on vehicle choice, with two thirds (65%) of drivers noting that this was improving and 44% adding that they could do most journeys on a single charge. However, almost half (46%) said published data was hard to understand, and this was even higher among those who had researched electric vehicles in detail (58%) or already drive one (59%). In turn, 50% expected to get less than the manufacturers’ stated range, and 56% said that this would put them off getting an electric vehicle altogether. Neill Emmett, head of marketing at LeasePlan UK and the study’s project lead, said: “Most EV models work out cheaper than diesel or petrol cars due to the lower whole-life costs. “We urgently need greater access to more financially attainable vehicles [and] continue to educate people about the cheaper running costs of an EV – even in the current economic environment – to tackle many of the common misconceptions we’re seeing.” https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/company-cars/drivers-still-sceptical-about-electric-vehicle-savings

NEWS 29 September 2022 Where is the UK science minister? Government’s plans worry researchers New Prime Minister Liz Truss has yet to appoint someone to oversee research, and her economic policy has sparked a currency crisis. The UK science community is urging new Prime Minister Liz Truss to appoint a science minister — a post that has been vacant for nearly three months — and to recommit to the previous administration’s agenda to make the country a ‘science superpower’. The pleas come amid fears that Truss’s government will deprioritize research and that her economic agenda, which has sent the pound tumbling to record lows, will hurt UK scientists. “It’s really important that the new government sends a really strong signal to the community that the ‘science superpower’ agenda is alive and well,” says Martin Smith, head of the Policy Lab at the biomedical-research funder Wellcome in London. “It was a very strong part of [previous prime minister] Boris Johnson’s rhetoric and we haven’t seen evidence of that so far from the new administration.” Conservative Party members appointed Truss in early September, after Johnson announced his resignation in July. Her government is considered more right-wing than her predecessor’s, and she has already made several decisions that worry scientists and research-policy analysts. Last week, she disbanded the National Science and Technology Council, a parliamentary committee established by Johnson in 2021 that aimed to make strategic decisions about the country’s research efforts. And the post of science minister remains unfilled, months after previous science minister George Freeman resigned in July as part of a drive to force Johnson’s resignation. This week, Julia King, chair of the Science and Technology Committee of the UK Parliament’s upper chamber, the House of Lords, wrote to Truss urging her to appoint a science minister and reconsider the council’s disbanding. “If we’re going to deliver that [science superpower] vision, we really need coordination across government departments,” King told Nature. Never-ending uncertainty The government’s lack of clear direction on science has inflamed existing uncertainties for UK scientists. After six years of contentious negotiations over Brexit, the European Union and the UK government have yet to come to an agreement on whether the United Kingdom will remain part of the EU’s flagship research programme, Horizon Europe. The seven-year scheme will disburse nearly €100 billion (US$98 billion) in research funds, and previous EU science-funding programmes have been an important source of money for UK scientists. But it looks increasingly likely that UK researchers will lose access to this funding pot, as officials remain deadlocked over the political details of Brexit. In June, more than 100 UK-based researchers who had won funding from the programme’s prestigious European Research Council lost their grants because they chose not to relocate to Europe — a condition of the funding. The UK government says that it has a back-up funding plan for researchers, called Plan B, but details are lacking. “The worst thing is the prolonged uncertainty, because that’s just pouring acid on the soft tissues of collaboration that we rely on, between UK researchers and research across the rest of the EU,” said James Wilsdon, who studies research policy at the University of Sheffield, UK. Currency collapse So far, the new government has given no indication that it will change the previous administration’s overall strategy on research spending. Last year, Johnson’s government committed to increasing the country’s research and development (R&D) budget to £20 billion (US$22 billion) per year by 2024–25, with a target of spending 2.4% of gross domestic product on R&D in 2027. Although the budget was hailed at the time as the country’s largest ever for R&D, the target still lags behind the research spending of nations including the United States and Germany. Even if Truss’s government keeps to this funding allocation, the economic climate and the weak pound are likely to dilute its value. Last week, the new UK finance minister — chancellor of the exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng — announced a shift in fiscal policy aimed at driving economic growth. But the policies, which offered households help with rising energy costs but cut taxes for the richest, have drawn the ire of national and international economists and sent the pound plummeting to its lowest level in decades. The currency turmoil comes against the backdrop of rising energy prices linked to the war in the Ukraine, and a broader cost-of-living crisis as inflation and interest rates soar. Researchers fear that these factors will erode the research budget in real terms and squeeze budgets for the day-to-day running of laboratories. “It’s a real issue for science,” says Wilsdon. “A lot of equipment is internationally imported, you’re in a very obvious global market for people and there’s relatively fixed overhead costs in terms of running labs and facilities.” Many pressures But some researchers say that it is too soon to tell how Truss’s government will value science. Research is one of many priorities clamouring for the prime minister’s attention — among pressing issues such as the economy, energy and social policy. “Because of all the noise and the new announcements in the tax and other spaces, there has really been very little attention to anything that relates to science,” says Adrian Smith, president of the Royal Society in London. “It’s understandable, given the mayhem that’s going on with the markets and the rest of it, but it would be nice to get some reassurance that the commitment is still there.” Sarah Main, executive director of the Campaign for Science and Engineering, a research-advocacy group in London, agrees that the science community needs certainty — and that Truss should stick to the previous government’s agenda. “The new administration is clearly pursuing disruptive change,” says Main. For research, “they should really stay the course that has been set”. The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — which oversees the science ministry — did not respond to requests for comment, and the government’s chief scientific adviser, Patrick Vallance, declined Nature’s request for an interview. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03112-w https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03112-w

Nick Movie: Blonde Time: 2022 Netflix / Amazon / HBO?: Netflix Duration of the movie: 2h46min Trailer:

Live Performance Title: Tove Lo - Habits (Stay High) - Hippie Sabotage Remix Signer Name: tove lo Live Performance Location: - Official YouTube Link: Your Opinion About the Track (Music Video):9/10

Music Title: Stoto - Still Can't Sleep (Original Mix) Signer:stoto Release Date:30/09/2022 Official Youtube Link: Informations About The Signer:- Your Opinion About The Track (Music Video):9/10

Luca Modric

Cold Coffe / Iced Coffe?

Bullet

blinged-out .38-caliber pistol What's Ur Fav(Prefered) Way To Die?

2177 2177

done

18 90 / 3 ?

11990

5800

9/10

5

57