EVIL BABY.

Welcome

V1, nice blur, text

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

Hello, have a nice day Well he unban u, but you still have the banned, it's okay follow my steps and your problem will be fixed. [EN] delete your cs and uninstall it. how to uninstall it go to Control panel => Programs = > Uninstall a program => Search for ur cs then click on it right left then he will ask you, are you sure u want to uninstall it, "Yes Or No "you will choose "yes" 1. 2. 3. you will go to the game from again to install it. you will change file of game in install 1. 2. 3. here you will choose any folder to put the files of game there 4. Done follow this steps by step and your problem will be solved Good Luck [AR] حسنًا ، قام بإلغاء الحظر ، لكن لا يزال لديك المحظور ، فلا بأس في اتباع خطواتي وسيتم إصلاح مشكلتك. حذف cs الخاص بك وإلغاء تثبيته. كيفية إزالة تثبيته ، انتقل إلى لوحة التحكم => البرامج => إلغاء تثبيت برنامج => ابحث عن العبه الخاص بك ثم انقر فوقه لليسار ثم يسألك ، هل أنت متأكد أنك تريد إلغاء تثبيته ، "نعم أو لا" ، سوف تختار "نعم" 1. 2. 3. 4. سوف تذهب إلى اللعبة من جديد لتثبيتها. سوف تقوم بتغيير ملف اللعبة في التثبيت 1. 2. 3. هنا سوف تختار أي مجلد لوضع ملفات اللعبة هناك 4.Done اتبع هذه الخطوات خطوة بخطوة وسيتم حل مشكلتك حظا طيبا وفقك الله

Happy birthday

Welcome

V2 text, blur, effect

Jeep has revealed details of a powerful plug-in hybrid version of the Renegade SUV, set to go on sale in June 2020. Revealing the Renegade PHEV in cutaway form, Jeep’s Head of Product Marketing Marco Pigozzi said the company intended for the new model ‘to sell in volume’ and, to that end, the Renegade PHEV would be priced ‘aggressively’. The new car is substantially based on today’s Renegade, with the most major change being the addition of a 134bhp rear-mounted electric motor, mounted on a modified version of the AWD Renegade’s rear subframe. The battery - which will be good for an EV range of 31 miles at up to 81mph in ideal conditions - has been mounted in the floorpan’s centre tunnel and also takes up some space under the rear seat. The fuel tank - also under the rear seat - has been squeezed down to a capacity of 39-litres. Under the bonnet, the 177bhp four-cylinder turbo petrol engine now drives the front wheels through a six-speed automatic ‘box (in place of the standard nine-speed unit). The engine also gains a belt-activated generator, which recharges the battery when the car is braking or coasting. The car can run in pure EV mode with electric power sent to the rear wheels, in pure petrol mode with drive to the front wheels and as a petrol hybrid with the generator assisting the engine. In all-wheel drive mode, there’s a total of 237bhp shared between all four wheels, allowing it to achieve a 0-62mph time of around seven seconds. It will also be possible to put the battery on ‘hold’ so it can be used when arriving in city centres at the end of a journey. Jeep is also promising a significant improvement in off-road ability because the rear electric motor offers a very precisely controlled 191 lb ft of torque that can be split between each rear wheel. There will also be a ‘TrailRated’ version of this Renegade that will be able to wade through water that's up to 60cm deep. Pigozzi says that the intention was to create this plug-in version without compromising interior room and that no space has been lost in the rear cabin, while the boot floor did not need to be raised. The main change was the loss of 15 litres in the boot because some of the electronic control systems are mounted on the boot wall. Interestingly, this PHEV only weighs 120kg more than the diesel Renegade, an important factory when considering high-speed economy. The Renegade PHEV will be launched in early 2020, with the electrified Compass due to follow that summer to coincide with its production switching from Mexico to Italy.

A drug that halves a woman's risk of breast cancer continues to work long after they stop taking it, say researchers. Anastrozole blocks the production of the hormone oestrogen, which fuels the growth of many breast cancers. It is already available on the NHS, but researchers at Queen Mary University of London said only a tenth of eligible women were receiving it. Cancer Research UK said the findings were reassuring. Who can take it? Anastrozole can be given only after the menopause because it cannot suppress oestrogen in younger women. It is already used as a treatment once breast cancer has been discovered, but now trials are focusing on preventing cancers emerging in the first place. Previous research, has shown anastrozole halves the risk of breast cancer during the five years women took the drug. But now, trials on 3,864 women show those taking it had 49% fewer breast cancers, even seven years after stopping treatment. In other words - the benefit lasts. The findings have been published in the Lancet and presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in Texas. "Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women and continuing to rise very rapidly," Prof Jack Cuzick, the director of the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine at Queen Mary University of London, told the BBC. He added: "We now have an agent that looks really effective, with minimal side-effects." Isn't this already available? Post-menopausal women at high risk of developing breast cancer, due to family history and other risk factors, have been recommended to take the drug since 2017. "Uptake has really been quite low," said Prof Cuzick. "Currently its about 10% of these women and we think it should be substantially higher." One issue is thought to be doctors being concerned about whether there was a long-term benefit. Another was around side-effects such as stiff joints, hot flushes and vaginal dryness. However, the study showed 75% of women given anastrozole were able to stick with the medication, compared with 77% who were asked to take a daily sugar pill. The academics say this suggests the side-effects are not severe enough to stop women taking the drug. How does the drug stop cancer? Cancers are a corrupted version of healthy tissue. However, a healthy cell does not become cancerous overnight. Instead it goes through multiple mutations that gradually morph it from healthy to cancerous. Anastrozole seems to be able to kill some cells that have begun the journey to becoming a cancer. "You're setting the clock back 20 years and you have to start from scratch to develop the cancer, which might take quite a long time," Prof Cuzick told the BBC. Will this eliminate the need for mastectomies? No. Drugs to prevent breast cancer mean having breasts removed is no longer the only preventive treatment. But, some women are at such high risk of developing breast cancer that the danger would be too higher even with medication. They may decide a mastectomy is still the best option. In the future it is hoped research will be able to predict who is the most likely to benefit from the drugs or have the least side effects, which should make such decisions easier. Are there other drugs? Another drug that interferes with the hormone oestrogen - tamoxifen - can also be used to lower the risk of breast cancer. There was a 49% reduction in breast cancer with anastrozole after 12 years (five on treatment and seven years off). The equivalent figure for tamoxifen is 28%. Dr Ivana Sestak, from Queen Mary, said: "The findings mean that for every 29 women taking anastrozole for five years, one case of breast cancer will be prevented during a 12-year period. "Around 49 women would need to take tamoxifen for five years to prevent one breast cancer case during the same period." However, tamoxifen is effective in women before the menopause. Anastrozole costs about 4p per pill. The list price of tamoxifen is about 9p per tablet. What do experts say? Baroness Delyth Morgan, chief executive at Breast Cancer Now, said: "These major findings could be really important in helping post-menopausal women at high risk of breast cancer to decide whether anastrozole is the right option for them. "It is worrying to hear that it may not be being offered to all that could benefit and we need to understand the extent of this potential issue. "It's essential that we raise awareness of this option among doctors and patients." Prof Charles Swanton, Cancer Research UK's chief clinician, said: "Up until now we only knew that tamoxifen has long-lasting benefits, so it's reassuring that this study looking specifically at anastrozole, which has fewer long-term side-effects, gives better protection to women years after they stopped taking the drug. "Doctors may still decide that tamoxifen is more appropriate for some women, but it's great that there are options."

Police in Pakistan say they are seeking to arrest PM Imran Khan's nephew for taking part in a violent protest at a hospital in which three patients died. Lahore police raided Hassan Niazi's residence and say he may now be hiding. Mr Niazi was among several hundred lawyers who ransacked a city hospital in a dispute with doctors. Riot police had to be called in to restore order. Images of lawyers - in suits and ties - assaulting staff and damaging property prompted shock and condemnation. Photos and videos of Hassan Niazi were widely shared on social media, as people lined up to criticise the lawyers. Mr Niazi has admitted taking part in the violence at Lahore's Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PIC) and said on Twitter he regretted it. From his uncle, who tweets often, there has been no mention of the furore over his family's link to Wednesday's violence. Mr Khan's nephew is prominent in footage of the attack, and can be seen participating in physical assaults as well as an arson attack in which a police van was set on fire. The lawyer and human rights activist was held soon afterwards by police and was seen being escorted out of the area. So there was surprise when his name did not appear in the police report listing those lawyers facing court action in connection with the violence. The authorities have not explained what happened after he was detained, but a spokesman for the city's police chief said Mr Niazi had been identified through video footage and was now being sought. "His residence in Lahore was raided by the police last night and also this morning to arrest him, but he was not found there and has possibly gone into hiding," the spokesman, Waseem Butt, told BBC Urdu's Shahzad Malik. Many are questioning this account. Some wonder whether he was freed because he is related to the prime minister. Opposition politicians are demanding Mr Niazi's immediate arrest. More than 80 lawyers were arrested over the hospital attack, and 46 have been remanded in custody. Lawyers called a nationwide strike on Friday, angry at police treatment of their colleagues in Lahore. But headlines, editorials and social media outrage suggested they were out of step with others in the country. One article in Dawn newspaper described the attack as "a stain on our collective humanity". Other commentators said it was a new low for Pakistani society's sinking levels of tolerance which is giving way to mob justice. What led to the violence? The lawyers had been protesting over the alleged mistreatment of some of their colleagues by hospital staff last month. But the final trigger for the violence appears to have been a video posted on social media by a doctor on Tuesday night in which he poked fun at the lawyers. Video showed the lawyers ransacking wards at the hospital the next day, beating staff and smashing equipment. As panic spread, doctors and paramedics hid, leaving patients unattended, including those in a critical state. Hospital sources said at least three patients - a woman and two men - died because doctors could not attend to them during the violence. It is believed that the woman had been in the intensive care unit. Riot police fired tear gas and took more than two hours to restore order, officials said.

Welcome

Welcome

what is it? It’s the second-generation Nissan Juke: bigger than before, more ‘mature’, and now driven on British roads for the first time. Fans of the oddball original (and with more than one million sold since 2010, there are a few) will already know a bit about this new model. In August, Autocar got an early taste with one of Nissan’s late-stage but imperfect prototypes at Millbrook Proving Ground. Two months later Matt Prior drove the finished article, though the glass-smooth roads around Barcelona can make even an Elise ride like an E-Class. So any test on British roads – including the comprehensive road-test proper that's yet to come – matters, and not only in terms of ride assessment but also because hiding behind its Japanese badge is a very British car. The latest Juke was designed at Nissan’s European Design Centre in Paddington, London, then developed at the brand’s hidden R&D hub in Cranfield and will be built in Sunderland, to the benefit of 34,000 jobs in assembly and through the supply chain. As far as buyers are concerned, the end product is refreshingly simple. For now, the Juke gets but one engine: a turbocharged 999cc petrol triple with direct injection and 115bhp. Diesel is out for good, but given that the car’s CMF-B platform is shared with the Renault Captur – its corporate cousin, and one already earmarked to receive hybrid power – some form of electrification is possible, if not yet probable. For the gearbox, there’s is a choice of either a six-speed manual or seven-speed dual-clutch auto, the latter reducing driver effort but also slackening performance. The Juke is otherwise typical fare for the supermini segment – raised ride-height or not – with a torsion beam at the back and MacPherson struts up front. The suspension still uses passive dampers, though as we’ll discover, the setup has been noticeably retuned, and there are now smaller, secondary springs housed within the dampers themselves to cushion rebound strokes. The standard tyres are from Bridgestone, and are said to offer the same traction and grip as the wider rubber found on the old Juke Nismo. What's it like? Not as odd as before – much less Pike Factory, if you know your quirky Nissans – but still unmissable. The huge, Hella-style headlights that look as though they should be fog lights remain, but the daytime-running lights above them are slimmer and now much more integrated into the Juke’s stern face. The old sidelights were perched atop the bonnet like those you’ll find on a Mercedes G-Wagen, but were changed because of their poor aero qualities and the fact they were pretty divisive among owners. Elsewhere, both the front and rear wheelarches are less cartoonishly [CENSORED]ceous but the greater expanse of bodywork between them is now aggressively scalloped, and the boot aperture is wider because Nissan has split the tail lights between the hatch itself and the corners of the bodywork, rather than mounting them entirely on the latter. There’s also greater rake to the front and rear screens, and, with a body that’s longer and wider than before, the designers achieved their aim of making the Juke look more stable, and better stuck to the road. But the Juke isn’t really stuck to the road – and I mean this in the positive sense. Point it down a B-road and you’ll wonder exactly how Nissan managed to make the closely-related Micra so dreary to drive when it’s clearly capable of much better. The steering is genuinely good, being quicker to respond than before but not at all nervous and with a slight firmness off-centre (there’s now a touch more castor angle) that builds nicely as the front tyres load up. Casual drivers will still find the ride on the firm side, and more so on the larger 19in wheels (genuinely, unless you crave the stance-enhancing larger size, stick to the 17in items), which make for a choppy low-speed gait, but get the Juke going up near the national speed limit and that firmness translates into a taut flow and body control rare in this normally underwhelming class. The Nissan has unexpected poise, is accurate, easy to place and confidence inspiring; it also doesn't roll much at all, carries speed well, and with good front-axle grip (relative to the rear – despite new rubber, the Juke's no limpet) has a Ford-like keenness for neatly bringing its tail into play. Which is interesting, because given the standards set by the latest Fiesta and Focus, you would expect the upcoming Puma – a head-on Juke competitor – to be better still, but we’ll have to wait to find out. Somebody, at some point, has to make this class interesting for enthusiasts. There's too much talent in the industry for it not to happen, and it feels like we're getting close. Elsewhere, it’s more ordinary. The light action of the six-speed gearshift (whose plinth is brightly red-ringed at night-time) is too generously damped and long of throw, and the engine never displays much hunger for revs. It seems a distant, remote thing, though our test car’s factory-fresh DIG-T unit probably had still to loosen up. The flip-side is that, even during motorway cruising with 2500rpm on the tacho in sixth gear, the Juke’s cabin feels well isolated. In fact, you could drive this car reasonably long distances without issue; the fat, squidgy seat bolsters offer good support and the driving position is, on the whole, excellent. It’s a comfortable cabin; the newfound telescopic adjustment to the steering column and a broad scope of seat heights that mean you can either gaze out over the creased bonnet from up on high, or set yourself low enough for a scuttle-grazing view forward. Should I buy one? If you’ve decided a small crossover is your bag and you enjoy driving, you will like the Juke. The engine lacks much character and its efforts are modest, but for this tester the car’s steering and handling – two pillars of day-to-day driving satisfaction – are considerably better than average. Maintaining speed is fun and I can’t honestly say that of the Seat Arona, although the Spanish car should still be regarded as the most agile steer in this class. The Juke’s interior represents another step forward; the longer wheelbase has translated into usefully more rear legroom and a larger boot, and while the motorcycle-inspired quirks of the original Juke are gone, plenty of soft-touch upholstery lifts the vibe considerably. It is a relief, however, that Apple CarPlay and Android Auto come free of charge, because even the sharpened graphics of the new 8.0in touchscreen can’t mitigate for the system’s slight latency and confusing menus. So avoid, if you can, the largest wheels, and accept that the second-generation Juke, for all its improvements, doesn't change the game in terms of refinement, sophistication, ergonomics or even handling. Do that and you'll find it good company and, even if the looks don't set your world on fire, more likeable than most. Nissan Juke specification Where Bedfordshire Price £20,995 On sale Now Engine In-line 3 cyls, turbocharged, petrol Power 115bhp at 1750-4000rpm Torque 148lb ft at 1750-3750rpm Gearbox 6-spd manual Kerb weight 1182kg Top speed 112mph 0-62mph 10.4sec Fuel economy 45.6-47.9mpg CO2 112-118g/km (NEDC) Rivals Toyota C-HR, Seat Arona

A vegetable-packed vegan lasagne made with dairy-free white sauce. It freezes brilliantly and makes the perfect vegan comfort food. Each serving provides 470 kcal, 16g protein, 61g carbohydrate (of which 15g sugars), 16g fat (of which 2g saturates), 8g fibre and 0.4g salt. Ingredients 4 tbsp extra virgin olive oil 1 large onion, finely chopped 1 small aubergine, cut into roughly 1.5cm/⅝in dice 1 medium courgette, cut into roughly 1.5cm/⅝in dice 1 red pepper, seeds removed, cut into roughly 1.5cm/⅝in dice 250g/9oz small chestnut mushrooms, thinly sliced 2 garlic cloves, crushed 100g/3½oz dried red split lentils 2 x 400g tin chopped tomatoes 2 tsp Italian seasoning or dried oregano 1 tsp sugar, any kind 1 vegan vegetable stock cube 150g/5½oz fresh young spinach leaves 9–10 dried lasagne sheets (ensure they are egg-free) salt and ground black pepper For the white sauce 3 tbsp sunflower oil 100g/3½oz plain flour 800ml/1¼ pint unsweetened almond milk 3 tbsp nutritional yeast flakes 1 bay leaf (optional) ¼ tsp ground nutmeg salt and freshly ground black pepper Method Preheat the oven to 200C/180C Fan/Gas 6. Heat the olive oil in a large, non-stick saucepan and fry the onion for 3–4 minutes, or until softened and lightly browned, stirring. Add the aubergine, courgette, pepper and mushrooms and fry for 12 minutes, stirring regularly. Add the garlic and cook for a few seconds more, then stir in the red lentils, tomatoes, Italian seasoning, sugar and crumbled stock cube. Refill one of the tomato tins with water (400ml/14fl oz) and pour into the pan. Stir well, bring to a simmer and cook for 15 minutes, stirring regularly. Add the spinach leaves, a handful at a time and cook for 1–2 minutes more. While the vegetables are simmering, make the white sauce. Heat the oil in a medium saucepan. When it is hot add the flour and cook, stirring all the time, for 1 minute. Stir in the milk, yeast, bay leaf and nutmeg and season well with salt and pepper. Bring to a simmer, whisking constantly with a metal whisk over a moderate heat for 4–5 minutes, or until smooth and thickened. (Use a silicone covered whisk if using a non-stick saucepan.) Adjust the seasoning to taste – you’ll need more black pepper than you might imagine. Spread a third of the vegetable mixture over the base of a 2½ –3 litre/4½– 5 pints ovenproof lasagne dish and cover with a single layer of lasagne sheets. Top with another third of the vegetable mixture (don’t worry if it doesn’t cover evenly) and a second layer of lasagne. Pour over just under half of the white sauce, after removing the bay leaf, and very gently top with the remaining vegetable mixture. Finish with a final layer of lasagne and the rest of the white sauce. Bake for 35–40 minutes, or the pasta has softened and the topping is nicely browned and bubbling. Stand for 5 minutes before cutting to allow the filling to settle.

Myanmar's leader Aung San Suu Kyi has defended her country against allegations of genocide at the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ). The Nobel Peace Prize laureate responded to widespread claims that Myanmar (formerly Burma) committed atrocities against Muslim Rohingya. In her opening remarks, she called the case against Myanmar "incomplete and incorrect". She said troubles in Rakhine, where many Rohingya lived, go back centuries. Thousands of Rohingya were killed and more than 700,000 fled to neighbouring Bangladesh during an army crackdown in Buddhist-majority Myanmar in 2017. Myanmar has always insisted it was tackling an extremist threat in Rakhine state, and Ms Suu Kyi maintained that stance, describing the violence as an "internal armed conflict" triggered by Rohingya militant attacks on government security posts. Conceding that Myanmar's military might have used disproportionate force at times, she said that if soldiers had committed war crimes "they will be prosecuted". Ms Suu Kyi - once celebrated internationally as a champion of democracy - has been de facto leader of Myanmar since April 2016, before the alleged genocide began. She does not have control over the army, but has been accused by the UN investigator of "complicity" in the military clearances. It marks a remarkable fall from grace for Ms Suu Kyi, who has chosen to stand up for the same army that kept her under house arrest for years. She told the court her country was committed to the safe repatriation of people displaced from Rakhine, and urged the court to avoid any action that could aggravate the conflict. What was the reaction? At the Kutupalong refugee camp in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, refugees shouted "Liar, liar, shame!" as they watched Myanmar's leader make her case live on TV. "She is a liar. A great liar," said Abdur Rahim, 52, at a community centre in the camp. Outside the court in The Hague, a small group of pro-Rohingya demonstrators shouted: "Aung San Suu Kyi, shame on you!". But her supporters came too - about 250 pro-Myanmar protesters who held placards bearing her face and the words"We stand with you". Pho phyu Thant - a Burmese national now living in Europe - was one of the organisers. "The world needs to be more patient with Aung San Sui Kyi," she told the BBC. "We support her and still believe in her. She is the only person who can bring about peace and prosperity in our country and resolve this very complicated situation." Defiance in the face of horrific testimony Analysis by Nick Beake, BBC Myanmar correspondent The weight of history looked to rest heavily as a nervous-looking Aung San Suu Kyi began her defence. She recalled previous acts of genocide and agreed it was the most heinous of crimes. But she then embarked on a carefully rehearsed argument that Myanmar had simply not joined the global list of shame. She admitted that, for example, military gunships had targeted civilians - but said Myanmar could be trusted to bring the perpetrators to justice. How could it be genocide, she asked, when a country was actively investigating such wrongdoing? Outside court, all this was applauded as a patriotic defence by supporters waving banners who had travelled from Myanmar. It was cheered back home by crowds who'd gathered in the main cities, including Yangon and Mandalay, to follow the hearing on big screens. There was, at one very brief point, a contrition I had not heard before. Without mentioning the Rohingya by name, she spoke specifically about the "suffering" of those who had fled to Bangladesh. But there was simply no acknowledgment of the three hours of truly horrific testimony of mass murder, rape and arson that the Nobel Peace Prize laureate listened to on Tuesday. Why is Myanmar in court now? The Gambia, a small Muslim-majority west African nation, brought the case to the ICJ on behalf of dozens of other Muslim countries. "All that The Gambia asks is that you tell Myanmar to stop these senseless killings, to stop these acts of barbarity that continue to shock our collective conscience, to stop this genocide of its own people," The Gambia's Attorney General and Justice Minister, Abubacarr M Tambadou, told the court. His country had acted after he visited a Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh and heard of killings, rape and torture, he told the BBC in October. What are the accusations? At the start of 2017, there were a million Rohingya in Myanmar, most living in Rakhine state. But Myanmar, a mainly Buddhist country, considers them illegal immigrants and denies them citizenship. Blow by blow: How a 'genocide' was investigated Will Omar get justice for his murdered family? The Rohingya have long complained of persecution, and in 2017 the military - the Tatmadaw - launched a massive military operation in Rakhine. According to The Gambia's submission to the ICJ, the clearances were "intended to destroy the Rohingya as a group, in whole or in part", via mass murder, rape and setting fire to their buildings "often with inhabitants locked inside". A UN fact-finding mission which investigated the allegations found such compelling evidence that it said the Burmese army must be investigated for genocide against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine. In August, a report accused Myanmar soldiers of "routinely and systematically employing rape, gang rape and other violent and forced sexual acts against women, girls, boys, men and transgender people". In May, seven Myanmar soldiers jailed for killing 10 Rohingya men and boys were released early from prison. Myanmar says its military operations targeted Rohingya militants, and the military has previously cleared itself of wrongdoing. What is the likely outcome of this case? For now, The Gambia is just asking the court to impose "provisional measures" to protect the Rohingya in Myanmar and elsewhere from further threats or violence. These will be legally binding. To rule that Myanmar has committed genocide, the court will have to determine that the state acted "with intent to destroy in whole or in part" the Rohingya minority. Even then the ICJ has no way of enforcing the outcome - and neither Aung San Suu Kyi nor the generals would automatically be arrested and put on trial. But a guilty ruling could lead to sanctions, and would cause significant reputational and economic damage to Myanmar. What is the current situation for the Rohingya? Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya have fled Myanmar since the military operations began. As of 30 September, there were 915,000 Rohingya refugees in camps in Bangladesh. Almost 80% arrived between August and December 2017, and in March this year, Bangladesh said it would accept no more. In August, Bangladesh set up a voluntary return scheme - but not a single Rohingya person chose to go. Bangladesh plans to relocate 100,000 refugees to Bhasan Char, a small island in the Bay of Bengal, but some 39 aid agencies and human rights groups have opposed the idea. In September, the BBC's Jonathan Head reported that police barracks, government buildings and refugee relocation camps had been built on the sites of former Rohingya villages in Myanmar.