Miss Fix It

Opponent's nickname: @#EVIL BABY Theme (must be an image): Work Type: Signature Size & Texts: Battle How many total votes?: 7 Work time: 24 hrs

Done

2615

5

92

280

Girl. man / women ?

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

47

Real name: Aliaa Your birthday: 11-Sep-2003

Name: Miss Fix It What you imagin?: mario Did you succeed: yes screenshot:

The objective of the Japanese firm is to align with the strict emission standards that govern the Old Continent and that have several manufacturers starting a strong path to electomobility. The large manufacturers continue to give clear signs that electrification is the way forward for the automotive industry and Honda, a Japanese brand, was one of the last to surprise after it became known that it will stop selling pure gasoline and diesel cars in Europe from 2022. This was confirmed by the senior vice president of the firm, Ian Howells, who according to statements collected by the Autocar medium said that Honda's strategy "will be a combination of hybrid and fully electric." "Obviously, if the legislation starts to move as we get closer to 2035, or it also moves away from hybrid, then we will shift our technology away from that," he added. In this way, Honda seeks to follow the path of other manufacturers such as General Motors who have announced a strong offensive in electromobility with the aim of reducing emissions and, incidentally, aligning with strict European standards. In that sense, Howells emphasized that there is a multiple approach within the automotive industry for the next few years. "There is a role to play for e-fuels, biomass, hydrogen, to some extent for conventional fuels and also batteries," he said. Despite these statements, the executive of the Japanese brand also emphasized the costs of electric cars, hence, he projected a more viable path towards hybrid technology. "They are between a third and 50% more expensive than a conventional or hybrid vehicle," he said. Thus, manufacturers continue to show that the path of the automotive industry points towards electromobility and, as the years go by, internal combustion cars lose more and more ground.

A po[CENSORED]r beauty influencer has found himself at the centre of a social media storm after pretending to be pregnant for 24 hours. The male YouTube star shared a video documenting himself experiencing the “challenges” of being pregnant for a day, telling fans it was “in no way shape or form to make fun of, to make light of pregnancy and the sensitivities and the complications that come around it”. The video followed Charles through a day of tasks and challenges, including a contraction simulator, while he wore a fake pregnant belly. To promote the video he also shared a photo on his Instagram account that showed him cradling a “bump” in an elaborate set up surrounded by flowers. But despite the disclaimer on video, the 21-year-old quickly attracted criticism for the stunt, with some women branding it “gross, disrespectful and insensitive”. RELATED: Tips and tricks from beauty blogger James Charles Many said the YouTuber – who has hit headlines in the past for being embroiled in bitter feuds with beauty rivals – had failed to take into account how insensitive the whole stunt was, especially those struggling to conceive. “I love you James, but be ready to expect backlash. This wasn’t a good move. It’s very insensitive and I’m generally not a sensitive person. Sorry bud. This ain’t right,” one person wrote. “Umm this is not a joke? … This is not OK? … Are you guys seriously allowing this to be OK?” While another said: “How thirsty for clout can you be?! So gross, disrespectful and insensitive. Also I’m sure he’s at an age where he knows that pregnancy jokes aren’t OK.” On Twitter, “James Charles pregnant” began trending, but for all the wrong reasons. One woman called it “gross and offensive to all women” while another said it was “distasteful”. While James hasn’t yet responded to the backlash, the disclaimer message on the video suggests he expected the situation. After stating the video was not made in any way to “make fun” of pregnancy, James said it was a “lighthearted” video. He also stated that “charities helping women through pregnancy complications” would receive a portion of the money made from the video’s streams. James has 25.5 million followers on YouTube and 26.8 million on Instagram. He’s estimated to be worth $US12 million ($A15.5 million). In 2020, he purchased a $US7 million mansion in Los Angeles.

We know that the disease is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which spreads between people in several different ways. The virus can spread from an infected person’s mouth or nose in small liquid particles when they cough, sneeze, speak, sing or breathe. These particles range from larger respiratory droplets to smaller aerosols. Current evidence suggests that the virus spreads mainly between people who are in close contact with each other, typically within 1 metre (short-range). A person can be infected when aerosols or droplets containing the virus are inhaled or come directly into contact with the eyes, nose, or mouth. The virus can also spread in poorly ventilated and/or crowded indoor settings, where people tend to spend longer periods of time. This is because aerosols remain suspended in the air or travel farther than 1 metre (long-range). People may also become infected by touching surfaces that have been contaminated by the virus when touching their eyes, nose or mouth without cleaning their hands. Further research is ongoing to better understand the spread of the virus and which settings are most risky and why. Research is also under way to study virus variants that are emerging and why some are more transmissible. For updated information on SARS-CoV-2 variants, please read the weekly epidemiologic updates.

The Holiday season has arrived and the Steam Winter Sale is officially upon us, which means you’re probably going to need some storage for all your new games. Luckily, software isn’t the only thing on sale right now, and the M.2 NVMe Samsung 970 Evo 500GB is currently sitting at a new low price of $59 on Amazon. This is part of our effort to share the best holiday tech deals we can find. Be sure to check back throughout the holiday season as we feature more deals on computer hardware and peripherals. Samsung 970 EVO 500GB: was $99.99 , now $44.99 at Amazon Samsung's most-affordable NVMe drive promises reads and writes of 3,400 and 2,500 MBps with a strong five-year warranty that covers 600 TBW. It uses Samsung 3-bit MLC V-NAND and the company's Phoenix controller. The Samsung 970 Evo is the slightly less fancy predecessor to the Samsung 970 Evo Plus, which is one of the best SSDs you can get right now and is also on sale at Best Buy right now, though with not nearly as steep of a discount. Still, even though its write speeds aren’t quite as high, the base 970 Evo is still a great upgrade from DRAM-less drives like the Intel SSD 660p. The 970 Evo also has the same 256-bit AES encryption as its successor. And its 3,400/2,500 read/write speeds are still plenty fast for most users, especially those just looking to load games quickly. That makes this drive a great place to start looking for the best SSD deals. The 1TB version of the 970 Evo is also on sale at Amazon, though it’s unfortunately only 22% off as opposed to 40% off.

Apple has been ordered to pay $502.8 million in royalties to internet security firm VirnetX for infringing on its VPN patents in the latest development in a long-running legal battle between the two firms. “We thank the jury for their time and appreciate their consideration but are disappointed with the verdict and plan to appeal,” an Apple statement read. “This case has been going on for over a decade, with patents that are unrelated to the core operations of our products and have been found to be invalid by the patent office. Cases like this only serve to stifle innovation and harm consumers.” The Texas jury took about 90 minutes to come to a decision, where it was asked to determine how much Apple should pay VirnetX for the patent infringement. While VirnetX believed it was owed $700 million, Apple argued that it should only pay a royalty rate of 19 cents per unit, totalling $113 million. Ultimately, the jury decides on a price of 84 cents per unit, coming to $502.8 million overall. A long-running dispute The legal contest between the two companies stretches back to 2010, when VirnetX first claimed that both Apple’s VPN on Demand and FaceTime solutions were built upon its own technology, originally developed for the CIA. Apple reportedly paid VirnetX $454 million back in March as part of a court case involving earlier patents. The most recent court case involves patents relating to a newer version of Apple’s VPN on Demand and has already been partially overturned, requiring jurors to re-calibrate how much VirnetX was due in royalties. The latest ruling may signal the end of this long-running dispute but, on the other hand, given Apple’s intention to appeal, it might not be the last we hear of it.

Done!