Agent47

I just told you, the lm i put was not near any afk zombie. The players who were zombies were all playing as normal (not afk). But the hate this "admin" has, it has gone far away.

1. They werent afk 2. I know whats the punishment for that action 3. who are you to talk about this, you werent even online, you were auto attacking afk XD and the reason im making this report is only that there in the server are admins with high grades who dont know anything to do with their job as admins, they might know only 2 rules "DONT ASK FOR AMMO/MOD/JET OR GAG 6-12" or "SHOOT LM ON AFK-SLAY". anyway this problem is between me and tayab, so stay out of this @YoU FoX.🙂

nope they werent afk, the lm i shot almost killed you, and by the hate you had you just wanted to slay me. Also i just told you a fact that you are stupid, i dont think there are rules which say "telling facts gets you gag" 😄

¤ Your Name: broski ¤ Accused Admin: tayab ¤ Time And Date: now ¤ Reason Of The Report: he slayed me for shooting lm on active zombies (not afk) ¤ Proof:

It was inevitable, really, but following the EU’s legislation requiring USB-C to become the common charging standard, Apple has now confirmed that it will comply with the law, and switch from Lightning to USB-C on future iPhones. Greg Joswiak (Apple’s senior vice president of worldwide marketing) said as much in a Wall Street Journal video interview(opens in new tab), confirming that "obviously, we’ll have to comply." Joswiak didn’t say exactly when that change will occur, as the law doesn’t come into play until 2024, so it’s possible that the iPhone 15 will still have Lightning, but equally Apple might not wait around to make the inevitable switch, and, indeed, it's been rumored that the iPhone 15 will use USB-C when it arrives next year. It’s clear from the interview though that this isn’t a change the company is keen to make. Despite having switched to USB-C for iPads and Macs, Joswiak noted that moving iPhones to USB-C will create a lot of e-waste, since the billions of Lightning cables around the world will no longer be useable with future products. He believes that by making the cables removable from the power brick (so that you can connect the cable of your choice to the brick), Apple had struck a good balance that doesn’t inconvenience customers, and that this forced move to USB-C isn’t the best thing for most of its customers. He also pointed out that governments tried to standardize micro-USB connectors in the past, and that if that had happened there would have likely been no Lightning cable or USB-C – both of which are superior to micro-USB. All of which are reasonable points, but with Apple’s move to USB-C on other products, the growing po[CENSORED]rity of wireless charging, and rumors of a portless iPhone, it seems like Lightning’s days were probably numbered with or without the EU’s interference. Analysis: expect USB-C globally While Joswiak wouldn’t say whether future iPhones will also switch to USB-C in the US and other regions outside the EU, it seems very likely that they will. His point about e-waste might mean we still see Lightning elsewhere, in order to minimize the number of unusable Lightning cables, but developing and producing iPhones with different ports for different regions seems like it would create a level of cost and hassle that could be avoided with a global change. Plus, as noted above, the days of Lightning ports are probably numbered anyway. E-waste aside, Joswiak’s issues seem to primarily be about the standardization of USB-C, rather than at the iPhone having a USB-C port. So before long all of the best phones will likely have the same charging port. https://www.techradar.com/news/apple-confirms-future-iphones-will-have-usb-c

The 13th-Gen Intel $409 Core i7-13700K slots into the middle of Intel's Raptor Lake product stack (or at least its product stack as of late October 2022), delivering the lion's share of the gaming performance of its market-leading counterpart, the $589 Core i9-13900K, in tandem with more than enough horsepower in productivity workloads for most users — but for $180 less. It also easily outperforms the competing AMD Ryzen 7000 chip, making it one of the best CPUs for gaming and a chart-topper in our CPU benchmark hierarchy. The Core i7-13700K's performance stems from its 5.4 GHz boost clock, a record for the i7 family, and Intel's addition of four more e-cores, bringing the chip to 16 total cores and 24 threads. Even though Intel still uses the 'Intel 7' process node, it leveraged a newer revision of the silicon to push clock speeds higher while improving power efficiency. Intel also etched the cores on a new, larger die and added additional L3 and L2 cache.Intel's continued aggressive chip pricing and options for lower-priced platforms and memory make the Core i7-13700K a powerful, yet more affordable option: The Core i7-13700K is the best CPU for gaming at its price point and also offers leading performance in our application benchmarks at a significantly lower price than AMD's competing Ryzen 7 7700X, and it even challenges the $549 Ryzen 9 7900X in most work. Intel Core i7-13700K Specifications and Pricing Just like the previous-gen chips, the 13th-Gen Raptor Lake processors come with a mix of both big performance cores (p-cores) for latency-sensitive work and small efficiency cores (e-cores) for threaded and background applications. The e-cores stick with the same Gracemont architecture as before, but the p-cores move from the Golden Cove design to Raptor Cove. For much more on the architecture, check out our Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i5-13600K review. The 16-core, 24-thread $409 Core i7-13700K contends with the eight-core 16-thread $399 Ryzen 7 7700X. Intel bumped the 13700K's p-core boost frequency up by 400 MHz over its predecessor, bringing it up to 5.4 GHz. Intel also threw in an additional four e-cores for a total of eight, and a 400 MHz increase to the e-core boost brings it to 4.2 GHz. The combination of higher clocks and more cores delivers a sizeable leap forward in multi-threaded workloads. The Core i7-13700K has the same 125W Processor Base Power (PBP - the amount of power the chip pulls when it isn't in a fully boosted state) as the previous-gen Core i7-12700K. However, Intel increased the Maximum Turbo Power (MTP), the maximum amount of power the chip can draw when in a boosted state. The new 253W limit is a whopping 63W increase over the prior-gen Core i7-12700K (33% increase). Intel’s new chips are its most power-efficient yet. But like AMD, Intel has taken a power-be-damned approach to regain leadership, dialing up the power limits for all the desktop PC chips. The heat can be hard to control, so you’ll need to plan for a beefy chip cooler. Intel doesn’t include a cooler with the Core i7-12700K but recommends a 280mm AIO watercooler or air equivalent (or greater). Existing LGA 1700 coolers are compatible with the new motherboards. Bear in mind that your cooler's performance can significantly limit the chips' performance, so it's best to overprovision, especially if you plan on overclocking. On the flip side, you can now easily overclock to the highest clock rates we’ve ever seen, and that's even without using exotic cooling. For instance, we dialed in a 5.5 GHz all-core overclock with an AIO watercooler with the Core i7-13700K. Intel also increased the 13700K's L2 cache from 1.25MB to 2MB for each p-core and doubled the amount of L2 cache for each cluster of e-cores to 4MB. Intel also added 5MB of additional L3 cache. Intel has increased its DDR5 memory support up to 5600 MT/s if you use one DIMM per channel (1DPC), a big increase over the prior 4800 MT/s speed with Alder Lake. Just as importantly, Intel increased 2DPC speeds up to 4400 MT/s, an improvement over the previous-gen 3600 MT/s. Unlike AMD's all-in approach with DDR5, Raptor Lake also supports DDR4-3200 memory, ensuring a value option for Intel platforms. Raptor Lake drops in to motherboards with the LGA 1700 socket, so it will work with existing 600-series or new 700-series chipsets. Intel says that, on a like-for-like basis, you shouldn’t see any performance differences if you use a previous-gen 600-series motherboard for Raptor Lake. As usual, Intel has Z-series (Z790, in this case) motherboards available at first, with the value-centric B- and H-series coming when it launches the rest of the Raptor Lake lineup. The 700-series motherboards bring minor improvements over the 600-series, but Intel has increased the number of PCIe 4.0 lanes hanging off the chipset to 20, an increase of eight additional lanes, and support for one more USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 200Gps port, bringing the total to five. As before, the Raptor Lake chip itself supports 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 and four PCIe 4.0 lanes for a storage device. We'll jump right to the benchmarks, but you can find the test setup particulars further below. Gaming Performance on Intel Core i7-13700K — The TLDR Below you can see the geometric mean of our gaming tests at 1080p and 1440p, with each resolution split into its own chart. Be aware that a different mix of game titles could yield somewhat different results (particularly with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D), but this serves as a solid overall indicator of gaming performance. We're testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to reduce GPU-imposed bottlenecks as much as possible, and differences between test subjects will shrink with lesser cards or higher resolutions and fidelity. You'll find further game-by-game breakdowns below. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i7-13700k-cpu-review

Name of the game: Rust Price: 26,79$ Link Store: https://store.steampowered.com/app/252490/Rust/ Offer ends up after X hours: 2 November Requirements: MINIMUM: Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Windows 8.1 64bit Processor: Intel Core i7-3770 / AMD FX-9590 or better Memory: 10 GB RAM Graphics: GTX 670 2GB / AMD R9 280 better DirectX: Version 11 Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 25 GB available space Additional Notes: SSD is highly recommended or expect longer than average load times. RECOMMENDED: Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Windows 11 64bit Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K / AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Memory: 16 GB RAM Graphics: GTX 980 / AMD R9 Fury DirectX: Version 12 Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 25 GB available space Additional Notes: SSD is highly recommended.

When you’ve been in the game of producing hot hatches for as long as Volkswagen’s R performance division, and it’s coming on 20 years, you’re duly expected to deliver. The latest Golf R is arguably one of the best examples of the genre yet – an expensive but nevertheless alluring combination of all-round performance and dynamic ability that’s made even better through the availability of an optional Performance Package, which extends the car’s remit with extra driving modes without detracting from its excellent everyday driveability.Now, Volkswagen R is seeking to build on the solid foundations of its best-selling model with this - the R20. Already on sale in the UK at a price that positions it £5400 above the standard Golf R, the anniversary special aims to ratchet up the excitement of the Golf R even further with a series of subtle changes, including an added 13bhp from its engine – a move that makes it the most powerful road-going Golf yet. Not that you’d immediately notice. Like all R models down through the years, this new one doesn’t go out of its way to signal its added potential. What you get is the same restrained exterior styling treatment brought to the standard Golf R, albeit with blue coloured R badges, an anniversary logo on the B-pillars, a “20 R” puddle light projection and a combination of three exterior colours: Lapiz Blue Metallic, Pure White and Deep Black Pearl Effect. One key differentiation to regular Golf models is the lowered ride height. It gives the R20 a pleasing hunkered-down stance that’s enhanced by the same 19-inch wheel and tyres as those worn by the standard Golf R. Inside, the R20 is the first ever Volkswagen model to receive trim elements made from carbon fibre. Otherwise, it offers the same understated driving environment as its marginally less powerful sibling on sale since 2019. The fundamentals are excellent, though a lack of physical buttons means you spend a lot of time searching through digital menus for seemingly simple commands and perceived quality is spoiled somewhat by the shiny black plastic around the displays and centre console. Much of the interior design is shared with the Golf GTI, but with unique R accents and logos within the upholstery of the sport seats and Alcantara. There’s also a nicely proportioned flat bottom multi-function steering wheel featuring an R-button that allows you to instantly call up Race mode, a series of unique R graphics for the 10-in instruments display, a standard 10-in touch screen infotainment display with Volkswagen’s Discover navigation system, USB-charging ports and a wireless smartphone charging pad. The key task Volkswagen R set itself in the development of the R20 was to retain the core elements of the standard Golf R model while building on its performance. The latest evolution of the Golf R’s 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol unit receives an updated software package that allows its wastegate to open and the turbocharger to keep spinning during periods of trailing throttle. This added inertia is claimed to provide it with greater response, as the turbocharger doesn’t need to be set spinning again when you get back on the throttle. As a result, boost builds more rapidly, allowing the EA888 designated engine to hit its peak with greater punch and accelerative force than before. The 13bhp increase takes its reserves up to 328bhp, while torque remains the same as the standard Golf R at 310lb ft. Further changes are focused on the seven-speed dual-shift gearbox, which provides both automatic and manual shifting. It has been recalibrated to provide a more aggressive shift action in Sport mode. The R20 includes the Performance Package offered on the standard Golf R as standard. Alongside Comfort, Sport and Race, it brings additional Drift and Special driving modes – the latter tuned specifically for track driving and developed at the Nürburgring circuit in Germany. I don’t remember the sound of the latest Golf R’s engine ever being disappointing, but a new Emotional Start function, which fleetingly extends the revs to 2500rpm upon start-up, certainly makes sure it is a lot more present when you hit the start button. Initial impressions reveal there is not a great deal to differentiate the driving experience of the R20 from the standard Golf R around town. Its reworked engine is outstandingly flexible in Comfort mode, with crisp response and an agreeably smooth action that urges you to use the steering wheel mounted paddles of the gearbox in manual mode whenever the opportunity presents itself. Switching into Sport alters the character and sound to a more playful level, though it is not until you call up Race that it begins to reveal its ultimate potential. Here, the full effect of the changes Volkswagen R has made to the R20’s engine is more apparent. The reworked operation of the turbocharger brings added determination to the acceleration out on the open road. The overall response of the engine is quite striking and very much central to its appeal. My sense is the R20 is smoother, sweeter and altogether more accommodating the standard Golf R when pushed hard. Revs build rapidly on a loaded throttle. The fully variable properties of the 4Motion four-wheel drive system allow the limited-run R model to deploy its power with great effect. The electro-hydraulic system reacts quickly, apportioning drive between the front and rear axles and, with a so-called R Performance Torque vectoring function, between each individual rear wheel. Traction is never in doubt. Volkswagen R claims a 0-62mph time of 4.6sec, which is 0.1sec inside the time quoted for the standard Golf R. Top speed, as with the Golf R with Performance Package, is limited to 168mph. Like the standard Golf R, the R20 offers plenty of adaptability in terms of ride and handling. There’s a general tautness to its on-road character even in Comfort, which is what you’d expect from a car with such sporting aspirations. However, it is rarely harsh. The electro-mechanical steering is light and quite direct. The suspension, a combination of MacPherson struts up front and a multi-link arrangement at the rear with adaptive damping provides the R20 with great body control. There is impressive poise to the handling. Stability is also a real strong suit at higher speeds. Formidable grip, even on the 235/35 R19 Pirelli Sottozero winter tyres worn by our test car, makes for impressively neutral cornering traits. The clever operation of the four-wheel drive system quickly curtails any tendency towards understeer by sending the power back to the rear wheels. Keep your foot planted, and it will even entertain a fleeting moment of oversteer in Race mode. For those seeking more, the Drift and Special modes reduce the dependency on the electronic stability program (ESP), allowing lurid slides on command. Whether this all warrants a price tag of £48,095 is debatable. The R20 serves up great pace and engaging dynamics, but that is a lot of money to be dropping on a hot hatch, even one that is expected to rise in value in future years owing to its exclusivity. Not that I suspect Volkswagen will have any trouble shifting the limited number of right-hand drive examples planned for sale in the UK, mind you. The Golf R has always proven po[CENSORED]r, and I don’t see why this 20th-anniversary model would be any different. You’ll need to get in early though. Production is only planned to run for the next 12 months Link :https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/volkswagen/golf-r/first-drives/volkswagen-golf-r-20-years-first-drive

The world faces "probably the most dangerous" decade since the end of World War Two, Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned. In a wide-ranging speech on Thursday, he sought to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a move that has left his country internationally isolated. Mr Putin also accused the West of nuclear blackmail against Russia to force allies to turn away from Moscow. The West has denounced recent veiled nuclear threats by the Kremlin. Earlier this week, the Nato military alliance condemned unsubstantiated claims by Russia that Ukraine might use a "dirty bomb" - conventional explosives laced with radioactive material. Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said alliance members "reject this allegation" and "Russia must not use it as a pretext for escalation". President Putin was speaking to the annual Valdai forum after a series of recent military defeats in Ukraine and growing public anger at home over a drive to mobilise some 300,000 Russians for the war effort. The day before his address in Moscow, he had overseen routine nuclear exercises that involved a supposed nuclear strike in retaliation for an enemy's massive nuclear attack. "We've never proactively said anything about Russia's possible use of nuclear weapons. We've only responded with hints to comments voiced by the leaders of Western countries," he told his audience. President Putin singled out former UK prime minister Liz Truss for suggesting during an August campaign event that she would be ready to press the nuclear button if circumstances required her to do so. He said he was surprised the UK's allies did not object: "What were we supposed to do? Keep silent? Pretend that we didn't hear it?" However, he has himself repeatedly warned that Russia would use "all available means" to protect itself, in what has been widely seen as a clear nuclear threat. He repeated his recent attacks on the West, and what he called its "dangerous, bloody and dirty game" of denying countries their sovereignty and uniqueness. The West's "undivided dominance" over world affairs was now coming to an end, he asserted. "We're at a historical frontier. Ahead is probably the most dangerous, unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the end of World War Two." The West was no more able to be in charge - but was "desperately trying" to do so. He said a "future world order is being formed before our eyes", and accused the West, led by the US, of trying to destroy Russia. No evidence was provided to back up his claims. What we saw and heard today was the world according to Vladimir Putin. It is a world in which Russia is squeaky clean and the West is to blame for everything, from the war in Ukraine to the global food crisis. We saw a Kremlin leader who has absolutely no regrets for what he has done - or at least who is not prepared to voice those publicly if they do exist. And so, Vladimir Putin painted for us his parallel reality of what is happening. He blamed the West for "igniting" the war in Ukraine; he insisted that the new world order should be based on "law and justice" - this from a president who, eight months ago, launched a full-scale invasion of a sovereign, independent nation. He claimed Russia had been wrongly accused of threatening to use nuclear weapons. And yet, since February, President Putin has dropped several unsubtle hints that he would be prepared to use every weapon in Russia's arsenal in this conflict. For me, perhaps the most telling comment was about the "losses" President Putin admitted to having suffered in his 'special military operation.' "I'm always thinking of the human lives lost," he said. But that was all he said about that, before quickly moving on to the "enormous benefits" Russia had, in his opinion, gained, including "the strengthening of Russia's sovereignty". Link : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63417487