vMuz1c-♕™

Alienware 17 R5 Review: Powerful Gaming, Back in Black ALIENWARE 17 R5 PROS Sleek new black color Strong graphics performance Alienware Command Center is revamped Solid audio Vivid display Comfortable keyboard CONS Poorer CPU performance than competitors VERDICT The Alienware 17 R5 looks great and has a lovely display and strong audio, and while it plays games well, it has weaker CPU performance than its competitors. The Alienware 17 is mammoth. It’s an obsidian goliath in a new coat of paint that’s handsome and slightly refreshing. While this model retains the same basic shape as versions from previous years with aggressive angles and a spaceship theme, the laptop’s aluminum frame is all-black, giving it a serious aesthetic that means business. There’s also more RGB lighting zones than ever before, with 13 areas that can be programmed in the Alienware Command Center, including both sides of the screen, several zones on the keyboard, and two Alienware logos. The lid is all-black and is where you’ll get the most of the spaceship motif. Alienware’s logo is there in silver, and yes, it lights up. Lifting the lid reveals the 17.3-inch display surrounded by a thick bezel. The deck surrounding the keyboard is covered in a soft-touch material that feels luxurious to lay your wrists on, though I wish the keyboard were slightly further forward. Like many Alienware models before it, the chassis has a section that juts out the back with for extra cooling and few more ports. The whole thing feels built like a tank. While Alienware doesn’t make any drop-test claims, the aluminum is paired with steel reinforcements, and this thing feels like a luxury device when you’re gaming and when you’re just carrying it from room to room. That, of course, results in a heavy PC. The Alienware is 9.8 pounds and has a 16.7 x 13.1 x 1.2-inch footprint. That’s heavier than the 8.1-pound Aorus X9 and 8.6-pound Origin PC Eon 17-XMSI’s GT75 Titan, however, is even heavier at 10.1 pounds and is a chunky 2.3 inches thick. very port you could reasonably expect is on the Alienware 17. On the left side are USB Type-C and USB 3.0 Type-A ports and separate headphone and microphone jacks. The right side features only a single USB 3.0 port. Everything else is on the rear, including an Ethernet jack, mini DisplayPort, HDMI output, Thunderbolt 3, a port for Alienware’s proprietary graphics amp and a barrel power jack. Specifications Display 17.3” QHD (2560 x 1440) TN+WVA (120Hz, G-Sync) CPU Intel Core i9-8950HK Graphics Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8GB GDDR5X) Memory 32GB DDR4-2666MHz SSD 256GB PCIe m.2 HDD 1TB 7,200-rPM Optical ✗ Networking Killer 1435 802.11ac 2x2 Wi-Fi, Ethernet jack Video Ports HDMI USB Ports (2) USB 3.0, USB Type-C, Thunderbolt 3 Audio 2.1 Speaker configuration with subwoofer, headphone jack, microphone jack Camera FHD webcam, Tobii Eye Tracking Battery Optional 99Whr, 68Whr standard Power Adapter 330W Operating System Windows 10 Home Dimensions (WxDxH) 16.7 x 13.1 x 1.2" Weight 9.77 pounds Other Alienware Command Center Price (as configured) $3,974.99

Hello. This problem from ur net , to fix it you must turn off ur modem for 10 seconds then turn it ON. And it will be fixed. Have a nice day.

Thank u all ?

When is a smartwatch not a smartwatch? When it's looking out for your health and well-being like the Asus VivoWatch BP. Announced at Asus' Computex 2018 press conference, the VivoWatch BP is the first mainstream smartwatch to offer blood pressure measurements. Although the company did not disclose pricing or availability, Asus announced several tantalizing specs and features. The biggest, of course, is the blood pressure monitoring. Using integrated ECG and PPG sensors, the watch delivers real-time measurements in 15 seconds. This is a serious game changer, as hypertension kills more than 9.4 million people a year according to the World Health Organization. WHO also estimates there will be 1.56 billion hypertension sufferers by 2025. nlike other watches that track this measurement, VivoWatch BP doesn't make you raise your arm to a certain height. All I had to do to make the magic happen was place my finger on the large metal sensor to the left of the watch face and let the watch do its thing. Equipped with Asus' proprietary ASUS HealthAI technology, the VivoWatch BP also keeps track of your lifestyle habits and recommends ways to keep your blood pressure at an acceptable level. And like other po[CENSORED]r smartwatches/fitness bands on the market, it also tracks your sleep and exercise patterns. And while it has some medical benefits, don't write the VivoWatch BP off as some ugly medical tool. Asus has worked to give the smartwatch a bit of style. For starters, the watch is 50 percent smaller than a regular blood pressure monitoring device. The wearable has a rather sleek watch face that's protected by Corning Gorilla Glass, and it has a slew of swappable bands made from medical grade silicon. The face is a little wide for my tastes, but I could see myself getting used to it sooner than later. Aside from the potential health benefits, my favorite thing about the VivoWatch BP is the battery life. Asus claims that it will last 28 days on a single charge. That's head and shoulders over the competition, and I can't wait to get this into the Tom's Guide labs to put it to the test.

Intel's keynote address at Computex 2018 came with a few surprises, but none were more surprising to the crowd than the demonstration of a 28-core workstation-class processor running at 5GHz. Intel says the new chip will come to market in Q4 of 2018. Before the event, Intel pre-briefed us about the 28-core model, but the company didn't disclose that it would come bearing a beastly all-core 5GHz frequency. The impressive display of multi-threaded performance probably consumed a hideous amount of power, which wouldn't lend itself well to a reasonable TDP rating for the processor. As such, we assume the processor was overclocked for the presentation. Intel's 14nm++ process has already proven that it can sustain 5GHz easily, even with all cores active, on six-core models. Even novice overclockers can achieve a 5.0 GHz overclock on many standard off-the-shelf K-series Coffee Lake processors. But processors with higher core counts, such as the 28-core model Intel had on display, often can't reach such high frequencies on all cores, although dedicated tuning can certainly squeeze out impressive single-core frequencies. For instance, we tested the 16-core Core i9-7960X and could only reach up to 4.3GHz before the processor was overwhelmed by the intense thermal output and 400W of power consumption. In fact, we've pushed past 350W of power consumption during some of our overclocked tests with the smaller 10-core Core i9-7900X. We've heard reports of up to 800W with the 16-core model and LN2 cooling, so its hard to speculate how much power Intel's new 28 core processor was pulling during the demonstration. It's likely that the new model has indium solder to help dissipate heat from the die, but Intel hasn't shared specifics. Intel's 28-core processor scored 7,334 CB Marks in an all-core CineBench test. For perspective, our sixteen-core Core i9-7960X at 4.3GHz reaches up to 3,792 CB Marks. We included a mock-up chart above with Intel's results superimposed over results from our labs, but be aware that we haven't confirmed Intel's numbers and the systems were tested under different conditions. In either case, the results are incredibly impressive compared to AMD's overclocked Threadripper processors and the 16-core Intel model. EDIT: According to this image we sourced from Engadget's compressed keynote video on YouTube, Intel apparently was running some sort of closed-loop cooling that required insulating material around the tubing. This could be a multi-stage phase cooler (sub-zero cooling), or possibly a more mundane water chiller, under the table. We also spot more shielding over the long rectangular waterblock and what appears to be six sticks of RAM flanking the processor on each side. That would imply this platform is based on the (until now) enterprise-class LGA3647 socket. We'll dig for more details and update as necessary. This means the processor could be a variant of the $8,700 Xeon Platinum Scalable processor we reviewed here, albeit with an unlocked multiplier. (That doesn't bode well for pricing). Unlike AMD, which pushes the voltage/frequency curve to the limits with its 2000-series Ryzen processors, Intel typically leaves itself plenty of room for higher frequencies. We often see this even on Intel's fastest models, which only boost up to 4.7GHz on a single core and 4.3GHz on all cores, but often overclock up to 5.1GHz on all cores. Intel's sudden push to wring the utmost performance out of its processors is obviously designed to one-up AMD before its rumored 32-core Threadripper 2 launch tomorrow. Intel also unveiled its new 40th-anniversary Core i7-8086K processor that comes with a 5GHz boost clock, and given the company's 5GHz demo with its 28-core model, we could see the company push the limits with its future mainstream desktop processors, as well. Intel also announced that it would have new S-Series models coming this year. These are obviously the Whiskey Lake processors, but Intel left us hanging on the details. It would be nice if Intel threw a curveball and deployed a completely new microarchitecture for the first time in four years, but that doesn't seem to be likely. For now, it appears that Intel is leaving its new microarchitectures locked behind the next step on the process ladder. It's puzzling that Intel hasn't simply brought a new microarchitecture to the existing process, thereby offering larger performance benefits than we see with the rewarmed Skylake architecture. In either case, Intel has a proven process and microarchitecture that still has some gas in the tank, even if it is running close to empty. If Intel carries this new approach over to its S-Series processors, it will set the stage for a much more interesting battle with AMD as Intel rolls out new mainstream desktop chips with higher core counts and record-setting stock frequencies.

V2 text , blur

Hello , type in console : cl_minmodels 1 hud_saytext

Congratulations !!

Welcome to CSBD

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

Welcome

The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect today, and it brings significant changes to how companies that deal with EU citizens’ data can collect and process it. GDPR Makes Explicit (Opt-In) Consent The Law Most online services previously tended to enable all of their data gathering checkboxes by default, because that’s how they could get the most users to “agree” to that collection. By far the most significant change the GDPR brings is that this practice is no longer legal in the EU. Users will also get more control of their data, including being legally empowered to request that companies delete all the data they have on them. There are still some grey areas in the law, such as companies being allowed to claim that they can collect some classes of data without consent if they have a “legitimate interest” to do so. The intention of the EU politicians wasn’t to allow companies to claim that any data whatsoever can be called a “legitimate interest.” However, some online services may still push the legal limits on this, and courts may have to step in to clarify the issue. New Data Processing Agreements From Online Services Over the past few weeks, you may have noticed that most of the companies to which you’ve subscribed in the past have started sending you emails to agree to their new data processing terms. This is happening because the data previously gathered by companies on their users does not qualify for consent, so they need your explicit consent for the use of that data. Although they had two years to prepare, most waited until the last minute to implement the changes, all while claiming that they're making the changes because they care deeply about your privacy. Additionally, the emails usually come with a warning that if you don’t agree you may lose access to your account. That’s a condition that may not be legal in some cases, because that shouldn’t qualify as free consent. Other companies may have simply warned you that their terms have changed and that you don’t need to do anything beyond that. This is usually sent by companies that have already obtained your explicit opt-in permission to collect your data in the past. GDPR Hall Of Shame After getting tired of receiving so many GDPR emails all of the sudden, Owen Williams from the Netherlands built a website called the “GDPR Hall Of Shame,” where he calls out companies that implement GDPR poorly. Among those “shamed” by Williams are Verizon-owned Oath websites (Yahoo, TechCrunch, Engadget, etc), which seem to use an opt-out rather than opt-in method for sharing users’ data with hundreds of Verizon partners; Razer, which says that unless you agree to its new terms your mouse or phone will stop working; Zoom, which gives users only the options of receiving more marketing emails or fewer; and other companies. Twitter also seems to be forcing users to agree to the new terms or their account will be deactivated: Google, Facebook, WhatsApp Accused Of Violating GDPR The None Of Your Business (noyb) privacy rights group, founded by Max Schrems, also accused Google, Facebook, and Facebook subsidiaries WhatsApp and Instagram of violating the GDPR due to the companies “forcing” users to consent to their new terms.Schrems is the same Austrian activist who fought against U.S. intelligence agencies’ mass surveillance operations targeting EU citizens as well against the American companies violating EU citizens’ rights with their data collection. His lawsuit eventually brought down the Safe Harbor agreement and he’s currently in another lawsuit that may end up invalidating the new Privacy Shield and other loopholes American companies have found to avoid properly complying with EU data protection laws.In a public statement, noyb said: An end of “forced consent” does not mean that companies can no longer use customer data. The GDPR explicitly allows any data processing that is strictly necessary for the service – but using the data additionally for advertisement or to sell it on needs the users’ free opt-in consent. With this complaint we want to ensure that GDPR is implemented in a sane way: Without just moving towards “fishing for consent”. The “take it or leave it” approach embraced by some both large and small companies will likely not sit well with the EU’s executive body, the European Commission, which may soon start taking action against the companies they see as most blatantly violating the GDPR. If found guilty, the companies could end up paying up to $20 million or 4% of their global annual turnover, whichever of the two is the greater sum of money.

Welcome to CSBD

He will cry ?

Over the past few years the FBI has used all sorts of tactics to push its war on encrypted devices. The latest one seems to be to give Congress false information about how many devices the agency can't unlock. The FBI’s War On Encrypted Smartphones The NSA lost its own war against encryption in the late '90s, when it tried to get all manufacturers to add a “Clipper chip” to their devices so it could have access to users’ encrypted communications. The Clipper chip was later found to be vulnerable to multiple bugs, and if malicious parties had found them, they would likely have been able to access those encrypted communications. That means most users of such compromised devices would have potentially been at risk of getting hacked.This is why virtually all cryptography and security experts have argued against encryption backdoors. However, despite backdoors posing such a high risk to most users once they are implemented, the FBI has launched its own war on encryption. It seems the agency is willing to using every trick in the book to get Congress to pass an anti-encryption law, too, even if it means committing potential felonies to do so.First, the agency tried to set a precedent in court so that it could use a 200-year-old law to force companies to disable their devices’ security. The case in question involved an iPhone owned by one of the San Bernardino shooters. While the lawsuit was happening, the FBI did its best to avoid searching for alternative solutions to access the iPhone it wanted unlocked, despite the seeming urgency with which it needed that access.FBI Gives Congress False DataRecently, the FBI told Congress that there were 7,775 devices it couldn’t unlock in 2017 because of their encryption features. The FBI has used this fact to further advance its “Going Dark” campaign, which was an effort to teach the public and Congress that the agency can see less and less information about criminals as they increase their usage of encryption. However, this campaign has some issues of its own, such as the fact that we now live in a Golden Age of Surveillance. The Golden Age of Surveillance theory states that as people use more and more internet-connected (and insecure) devices, more data about them becomes available to law enforcement. Encryption helps combat that trend.It turns out that the FBI wasn’t telling the truth about the number of locked devices. A report from The Washington Post revealed that the number of devices the FBI can’t unlock is significantly smaller than the agency told Congress, in the range of 1,000-2,000: The FBI has repeatedly provided grossly inflated statistics to Congress and the public about the extent of problems posed by encrypted cellphones, claiming investigators were locked out of nearly 7,800 devices connected to crimes last year when the correct number was much smaller, probably between 1,000 and 2,000. The EFF has also submitted its own FOIA request to learn whether or not the FBI is telling the truth on this matter. If the FOIA request reveals that The Washington Post was correct and the FBI was not, then the law enforcement agency could suffer yet another hit to hits credibility in its war on encryption.