ROVEN

> Opponent's nickname: @Loenex > Theme (must be an image): > Work Type: Avatar > Size & Texts: 150x250 / Samurai > How many total votes?: 10 > Work time: 3h

V1,blur

AMD's Ryzen 5000-series chips go on sale today at 6am PT (2pm GMT), and you might want to move fast to secure one. AMD's Ryzen 5000-series CPUs will go on sale today at 6am PT, and online electronics retailer Newegg has already offered forewarning on stock availability for at least two of the brand new Zen 3 processors: the Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X. This is normal procedure for a tech launch, however. I cannot remember a single release, at least of those during my professional lifespan, in which something new and shiny didn't sell out immediately. The very nature of chipmaking keeps supply and demand in a constant state of flux, for better or for worse. So when Newegg says that Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X stock is "very limited and will sell out fast", it's not that surprising. These are the high-end chips, after all, and require the most pristine chiplets that AMD's chipmaker, TSMC, can deliver. On the bright side, Newegg also states that inventory of the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 5 5600X is in much better shape, and that is great news for anyone looking for an eight-core or six-core gaming CPU that, reportedly, is ready to take on Intel's finest in gaming. Following the shaky launch of Nvidia's RTX 30-series, retailers have been keen to implement effective bot protection, to ensure that available processor make their way into the hands of genuine customers and not resellers. Newegg has confirmed that its bot protection is again at "full strength", and that means you'll have to fill in a few extra steps before being able to checkout. As such, it also recommends using the Newegg app for faster checkout times. Other major retailers are also likely to be watching out for bots, too, and you'll want to keep an eye across all of them if you intend to snag one of the reportedly more elusive 12- or 16-core processors available later today. The Ryzen 5000 series will go on sale today at 6am PT (2pm UK). If you still haven't made your mind up over which of the best CPUs for gaming is for you, then check back on PC Gamer at that time to read our first Zen 3 review. There's no 'Silicon Valley' where Jacob grew up, but part of his home country is known as 'The Valleys' and can therefore it be easily confused for a happening place in the tech world. From there he graduated to professionally break things and then write about it for cash in the city of Bath, UK.

The veteran Bethesda boss says he's excited for people to see how the company's investment in its engine is received by fans. Bethesda is working on a new game engine to power its upcoming next-gen games, The Elder Scrolls VI and Starfield, and now Todd Howard has teased just how significant the update to the engine may be. He said during a recent event (via GI.biz) that the overhaul to the engine is "probably the largest we've ever had, maybe even larger than Morrowind to Oblivion." To help with this, Bethesda is heavily investing in the team behind it; Howard said there are more people at Bethesda working on the engine "by a factor of five" than ever before. The new Bethesda game engine is likely to retain some of the things people know and love about the studio's games, including support for mods and the general approach to open-ended worlds, Howard suggested. However, outside of that, fans can expect major changes. "From rendering to animation to pathing to procedural generation... I don't want to say everything, but it's a significant overhaul," Howard said. "It's taken us longer than we would have liked, but it's going to power everything we're doing with Starfield and Elder Scrolls 6. When people see the results, they'll hopefully be as happy as we are with what's on the screen and also how we can go about making our games." As for when we may see the fruits of this labor, Howard said fans should get comfortable. The developer stressed that he personally enjoys being able to announce a game and release it in relative short order, as Bethesda did with Fallout 4 when it was announced at E3 in June and released just a few months later in November. There is no firm plan yet for the proper announcement or release timing for The Elder Scrolls VI and Starfield, but Howard shared his high-level approach to keeping fans in the loop. "You just don't want to string them along too long. You get kind of fatigued," Howard said. "You have to balance that fatigue of wanting something versus that consumer excitement. Also it takes time, to be frank. Preparing trailers, demos and assets take time away from development. I remember games we've done where you're doing that for multiple years and it's like you have to top yourself. You have to top your previous demo. I'd rather spend all that time focusing on the game and prepare one big demo." The Elder Scrolls VI and Starfield were announced at E3 2018 with mood trailers, but not any gameplay or details about what to expect. Bethesda announced these games at the time to assure fans that it was working on what might be considered "classic" Bethesda games after the studio took a different approach with the multiplayer Fallout game, Fallout 76. Other major Bethesda franchises include Wolfenstein, Dishonored, and Doom--series that are all likely to see additional sequels in the future. Bethesda and its parent company ZeniMax were recently acquired by Microsoft for $7.5 billion, which marks the second-largest gaming acquisition in history. It's not clear if The Elder Scrolls VI and Starfield will be exclusive to Xbox, and Phil Spencer can't say more because that would be illegal. It's unlikely we'll hear more anytime soon, either. The deal isn't expected to close until the latter half of fiscal year 2021. Only then will Microsoft officially own ZeniMax.

The Ducati Multistrada V4 has officially been unveiled with radar-guided cruise control and new Desmo-less engine WE seem to have seen more of the 2021 Ducati Multistrada V4 during the last twelve months than pretty much any other incoming model. Be it official teaser campaigns, or spy-shots taken from the window of a passing car. Now though, we can wonder no more, as the official unveiling of the machine took place last night. With the new V4 powerplant getting its own reveal over the last couple of weeks – full details can be found here – it’s really on the chassis hardware, electronics, and styling we are still waiting to see. On the styling front, it is definitely a Multistrada. The design language that has followed the bike since its restyle in 2010 is very much still present, albeit in this new, fresh form. The biggest clue that this is the latest generation Multistrada is, of course, the thumping great 1,158cc engine, although there are some other clues too. The flanks of the bike also have been tweaked, with gill-slits now helping to channel air from the back of the radiator and away from the rider. The swingarm for this bike has also been changed, with the single-sided item of the old 1260 being replaced by a double-sided swingarm. Ducati Multistrada V4 engine One of the big talking points with the new Multistrada V4 is the inclusion of radar-guided cruise control. That’s a first on a production motorcycle, something Ducati will be very happy to have done before BMW managed it. The system features a radar sensor at the front and rear of the bike that can be targeted on a vehicle travelling ahead, with the system altering the bike’s speed to that of the target vehicle. The radars also provide the Multistrada with blind-spot detection (BSD), allowing the system to alert the rider to a vehicle that may be otherwise hidden from view. DUCATI_MULTISTRADA_V4_S Included in the bike’s slick-looking TFT are a host of riding modes covering Sport, Touring, Urban, and Enduro. Each offers a different throttle map, engine power, and suspension setting for the given application. As with the previous Multistrada, the new bike features a host of high-tech rider assistance systems including traction control, wheelie control, cornering ABS, and hill hold control. When you take that and then include the adaptive cruise control and the BSD, it really is one of the most advanced sports touring motorcycles on the market. 06_DUCATI_MULTISTRADA_V4_S Multistrada V4 specs Ducati V4 Granturismo 1158 cc engine with valve play checks at 60,000 km intervals Aluminium monocoque frame, steel tubes subframe and aluminium double-sided swing arm Marzocchi mechanical suspension with adjustable fork with 50 mm diameter stanchions and adjustable monoshock with cantilever layout. 170 mm travel front and 180 rear Pirelli SCORPION™ Trail II, 120/70-19” tyre on the front and 170/60-17” on the rear Bosch-Brembo 10.3ME Cornering ABS system 320 mm front brake discs, Brembo M4.32 4-piston radial callipers Full LED headlamp with DRL system Instrument panel with 5” full colour high-resolution TFT screen Ducati Multimedia System (DMS) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Bosch Power Mode Riding Mode Ducati Wheelie Control (DWC) Ducati Traction Control (DTC) EVO DUCATI_MULTISTRADA_V4_S Multistrada V4 S Colours Ducati Red with glossy black wheels with red tag Aviator Grey with glossy black wheels with red tag DUCATI_MULTISTRADA_V4_S Main as-standard equipment - as per Multistrada V4 except for: Electronic semi-active Marzocchi Ducati Skyhook Suspension (DSS) Evolution suspension system with Autoleveling function. 170 mm travel front and 180 rear Also available with alloy or spoked wheels 330 mm front brake discs with Brembo Stilema 4-piston radial callipers Full LED headlamp with DRL system and Ducati Cornering Lights (DCL) Hands Free ignition Instrument panel with 6,5” full colour TFT screen Ducati Connect with smartphone, music, and navigator app Ducati Quick Shift (DQS) Up&Down Cruise Control Vehicle Hold Control (VHC) 01_DUCATI_MULTISTRADA_V4_S

Votes are still being counted in the key battleground states that will decide the election. Mr Trump has been projected to win Florida, Ohio, Texas and Iowa already, but Mr Biden has taken Michigan - a state the President won in 2016 - and there are tight races still under way in Arizona, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia. So far, Mr Biden has 243 electoral college votes and Mr Trump has 214. To win the presidency 270 votes are needed. But it may be a day or more until we know the final outcome, as full results for seven states are yet to be projected. The full list along with the number of electoral college votes they carry is: Pennsylvania - 20 Georgia - 16 North Carolina - 15 Arizona - 11 Wisconsin - 10 Nevada - 6 Alaska - 3 This map will be updated with live results, and we'll be adding more graphics and analysis to help explain them as they come in. For full results click or tap here Mr Biden is currently leading the national po[CENSORED]r vote with 50.5% to Mr Trump's 48%, a lead of 3.5 million votes. Preliminary figures show the highest turnout since 1900, with 66.9% of eligible voters turning out compared with 60.1% in 2016. How Trump kept hold of Florida Mr Trump has been projected to win the closely-fought state of Florida, with 51% of the vote compared with Mr Biden's 48%. The president gained two points on his victory in the state in 2016, while Mr Biden failed to improve upon the tally recorded by Hillary Clinton. Exit poll estimates put President Trump on a 61% share of the white vote in Florida. Mr Biden appears to have made up ground on Hillary Clinton's performance with this demographic in 2016. However, the president is also estimated to have gained 12 points among Latino voters, bringing him nearly level with Mr Biden among that sizeable group. Looking at the split by age, Mr Biden appears to have an increased share of the vote among seniors. The latest exit poll figures suggest he is seven points up in the 65+ group compared to Mrs Clinton's share in 2016. But that gain has been offset by losses in the 30-44 age-group where Mr Trump is up 11 points on last time. Key details from the exit poll Exit poll data from across the United States gives a glimpse into voters' priorities and an indication of how different demographic groups cast their ballots. The figures suggest the proportion of total voters who are white has fallen by six percentage points on 2016, while remaining the largest group by ethnicity. The proportion of white voters backing Mr Biden has risen by five points on Hillary Clinton's figure at the last election but Mr Trump still takes the largest share of this group, the preliminary polling suggests. Meanwhile, Mr Biden appears to have gained support among under 30s and the middle-aged. The exit polls are carried out across the US by Edison Research and are a combination of election day interviews and telephone polling, designed to reach early and absentee voters. What voters thought about the key issues Nationally, more than a third of voters said the economy was the most important issue in deciding who to choose as president, with a further two in 10 naming racial inequality and 17% saying the coronavirus pandemic. However the issues were split along partisan lines with more than four times as many Trump voters saying the economy was the deciding factor, and Biden voters answering racial inequality and the virus. Voters were evenly split on how the US economy was faring, with 48% saying it was in "excellent or good" condition and 50% saying it was "not so good or poor". Similarly, 50% said that the US was doing "somewhat or very badly" at containing the pandemic and 48% thought the country was doing "somewhat or very well". The possibility of voter fraud has been raised repeatedly by the Trump campaign but a large majority of voters (87%) told the researchers they were confident that votes in their state would be counted accurately. Methodology The exit polls are made up of a national exit poll and 22 state exit polls which are carried out by Edison Research for the National Election Pool (ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC). For the national poll, a total of 15,590 voters who cast ballots on Election Day were interviewed at 115 polling places as they exited the polling places. This survey also includes 4,919 absentee and/or early voters interviewed by telephone. The data is then weighted to be representative of the po[CENSORED]tion and are adjusted further as votes are counted. All samples are approximations and are subject to a margin of error which will be wider for small sub-groups such as smaller ethnic groups.

v1,text

Nickname: ROVEN Age: 20 Link with your forum profile: https://csblackdevil.com/forums/profile/30051-roven/ How much time do you spend on our channel ts every day?: 7h Where do you want to moderate? Check this topic: free time. ScreenShot as you have over 30 hours on CSBD TS3 Server (type ''!info'' in CSBD Guard) : https://imgur.com/a/2Rjztpv Link with your last request to join in our Team: First Time Last 5 topics that you made on our section: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6

As if we needed more reason to try and get our hands on the GeForce RTX 30-series, Nvidia just announced that if you do pick up a GeForce RTX 3080 or RTX 3090, the new GPUs will come with Call of Duty: Black Ops – Cold War for free. After the ruckus surrounding the 30-series launch, with resellers and bots running riot, and the search for new stock wearing us down piece-by-silicon-loving-piece, frankly the whole thing's been turning into a bloody circus. One thing's for sure, these second gen GeForce RTX GPUs are stealing the show. And they're being utilised to the max with the new addition to the Black Ops franchise, so it might just be worth a look. Even if you just wanna wreck some undead flesh-addicts and be done with it, you may find there are other benefits to RTX-on, besides all the pretty lighting. With Nvidia spearheading the second wave of RTX, we're going to be seeing a generation of games with lifelike dynamic lighting and on-point ambient occlusion, as well as features like DLSS AI supersampling, and Reflex for decreased input lag. The CoD bundle includes the standard edition of the new game that's available from Battle.net to play from November 13, complete with the Woods Operator Pack, and the Confrontation Weapons Pack for some snazzy new AK-47 and XM4 blueprints and vibrant skins. If that sounds interesting to you, here's everything we know about Call of Duty Cold War, so far.

Bigfoot’s Ferrari SuperSUV Has Finally Been Spotted With most major supercar manufacturers following suit and providing SUV options for soccer moms with a need-for-speed (I’m kidding, I’d totally drive one of these too), it was only a matter of time for Ferrari to show up to the party; and boy are they late. Not are they late, the party has been shut down, packed up, and everyone is sleeping comfortably at home in bed. It’s been 2 years since the Lamborghini Urus rocketed to extreme success with its overweight traditional Lamborghini styling, and we still have another two(ish) years until the speculated official release of the upcoming 2022 Ferrari Purosangue SUV. Although the unconfirmed official release is still quite aways out, it’s nice to see the vehicle out in the wild so we know Ferrari is hard at work turning our Italian SUV dreams into a reality. As per thedrive.com’s article (where I sourced the images from, they have 100% credit and ownership of the images), they speculate that this SUV will probably feature AWD, but we have no way to tell what configuration of power unit the car will use. With this SUV most likely being a direct competitor to the Lamborghini Urus, we can expect the vehicle to produce close to the same (or a little more) horsepower than it’s 641 horsepower Lamborghini alter-ego. For all we know, this won’t even be the official body or styling of the car, only time will tell.

After a three-year delay, the US has become the first nation in the world to formally withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. President Trump announced the move in June 2017, but UN regulations meant that his decision only takes effect today, the day after the US election. The US could re-join it in future, should a president choose to do so. The Paris deal was drafted in 2015 to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change. It aims to keep the global temperature rise this century well below 2C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5C. What is in the Paris climate agreement? What US election results will mean for climate change 'I'll vote for you if you save my life' You've got cheap data, how about cheap power too? Why has this taken so long? The delay is down to the complex rules that were built into the Paris agreement to cope with the possibility that a future US president might decide to withdraw the country from the deal. Previous attempts to put together a global pact on climate change had foundered because of internal US politics. The Clinton administration was unable to secure Senate backing for the Kyoto Protocol, agreed in 1997. So in the run up to the Paris climate talks, President Obama's negotiators wanted to ensure that it would take time for the US to get out if there was a change in leadership. Even though the agreement was signed in December 2015, the treaty only came into force on 4 November 2016, 30 days after at least 55 countries representing 55% of global emissions had ratified it. No country could give notice to leave the agreement until three years had passed from the date of ratification. Even then, a member state still had to serve a 12-month notice period on the UN. So, despite President Trump's White House announcement in June 2017, the US was only able to formally give notice to the UN in November last year. The time has elapsed and the US is now out. What will the withdrawal mean in practice? While the US now represents around 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions, it remains the world's biggest and most powerful economy. So when it becomes the only country to withdraw from a global solution to a global problem it raises questions of trust. For the past three years, US negotiators have attended UN climate talks while the administration has tried to use these events to promote fossil fuels. "Being out formally obviously hurts the US reputation," said Andrew Light, a former senior climate change official in the Obama administration. "This will be the second time that the United States has been the primary force behind negotiating a new climate deal - with the Kyoto Protocol we never ratified it, in the case of the Paris Agreement, we left it." "So, I think it's obviously a problem." How is the US pull out being viewed? Although this has been a long time coming, there is still a palpable sense of disappointment for many Americans who believe that climate change is the biggest global challenge and the US should be leading the fight against it. "The decision to leave the Paris agreement was wrong when it was announced and it is still wrong today," said Helen Mountford from the World Resources Institute. "Simply put the US should stay with the other 189 parties to the agreement, not go out alone." The formal withdrawal has also re-opened old wounds for climate diplomats. "It's definitely a big blow to the Paris agreement," said Carlos Fuller, from Belize, the lead negotiator for the Alliance of Small Island States in the UN talks. "We actually worked very hard to ensure that every country in the world could accede to this new agreement. And so, by losing one, we feel that basically we have failed." Others say that the US pull-out is partly due to the failure of the Obama administration to have the Paris agreement ratified by the US Senate. "What Obama did at the end of his second term was fundamentally undemocratic, to sign up to a Paris agreement without going to the Senate and the Congress and instead doing it via executive order," said former UN climate chief, Yvo De Boer. "And then, in a way, you're setting yourself up for what has happened now." Could the US re-join the agreement? Yes, it could. In fact, while on the campaign trail, Joe Biden said he would seek to re-join as soon as possible - if he was elected President. Under the rules, all that is required is a month's notice and the US should be back in the fold. However, even if the US chose to re-enter the agreement, there would be consequences for being out - even for a few months. "We know that the UK and the EU and the UN Secretary General are planning an event on 12 December, on the fifth anniversary of the conclusion of negotiations for the Paris agreement, where they're going to try to drive more ambition," said Andrew Light. "Under the Paris rules, the US will not be able to participate in that." Not everyone in the US is upset to leave the Paris agreement? President Trump made leaving Paris a key part of his election platform in 2016, tying it into his vision of a revitalised US with booming energy production, especially coal and oil. His perspective on the Paris agreement was that it was unfair to the US, leaving countries like India and China free to use fossil fuels while the US had to curb their carbon. "I'm not sure what Paris actually accomplishes," said Katie Tubb, a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative US think tank. "In terms of getting to the end of the century, if the goal is to reduce global temperatures, it just can't be done on the backs of the industrialised world." "No matter what you think about global warming, and the nature of it, the pace of it, you have to take these growing economies seriously, and help them and I just didn't see Paris getting to that end, in any efficient or constructive manner." How have US opponents of the pull-out reacted over the past three years? In the wake of the President's announcement back in 2017, a number of states and businesses have pledged to continue cutting carbon and to try and make up for the Federal government's decision to walk away from the US commitment under Paris. Among them are America's Pledge, put together by former California governor Jerry Brown and the former mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg. They say that states and cities will help cut US emissions by 19% compared to 2025 from what they were in 2005 - that's not enough to make up for the US promise under Paris but it keeps those targets "within reach". image captionAt UN climate talks, groups representing states and cities that want to remain in the Paris pact have made their presence felt "The public understands that fighting climate change goes hand in hand with protecting our health and growing our economy," said Michael Bloomberg in a statement. "So despite the White House's best efforts to drag our country backward, it hasn't stopped our climate progress over the past four years." On the business front, there has been growing pressure from shareholders of large fossil fuel-based industries to face up to the climate challenge. A proposal filed by BNP Paribas Asset Management won a 53% majority vote at Chevron - it called on the oil giant to ensure that its climate lobbying was in line with the goals of the Paris agreement. Will other countries now leave the agreement? "I don't think anyone will follow Mr Trump out of Paris," said Peter Betts, a former lead negotiator for the UK and the EU in the global climate negotiations, and now an associate fellow at Chatham House. "Nobody has in the last four years and I don't think they will in the future." Some are worried that the US withdrawal will see other countries adopt a go-slow attitude, at a time when scientists are saying that efforts should be speeded up. A number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Russia have already shown a willingness to side with US efforts to push back on the science around global warming. "They are biding their time, they are saying that if the US is not in then we don't need to rush to do anything at this time'," said Carlos Fuller, lead negotiator from the Alliance of Small Island States. "I think they are hedging their bets to see what kind of a better deal they can get out of it, and not actually withdraw." Others are hopeful that the US withdrawal will drive a sense of unity among others, and see new leadership emerge. "The EU green deal and carbon neutrality commitments from China, Japan and South Korea point to the inevitability of our collective transition off fossil fuels," said Laurence Tubiana, one of the architects of the Paris agreement and now chief executive of the European Climate Foundation. "There were always going to be speed bumps as the global economy shifted off oil, gas and coal - but the overall direction of travel is clear. As governments prepare stimulus packages to rescue their economies from covid-19 it's vital they invest in technologies of the future, not the past."

The famous coupon, added shortly after Cayde-6's death, is going away in Beyond Light. Remember back in 2018, when Destiny 2 fan-favorite Cayde-6, the only member of the Vanguard with a personality, took three in the head during the Prison of Elders breakout that kicked off the Forsaken expansion? Shortly afterward, players built a real-world shrine to the beloved Exo at E3, complete with ramen packets—because, as we noted, he was a huge fan of spicy ramen. Bungie paid tribute to Cayde's sad passing shortly after it happened with the addition of a coupon that players could pick up from the ramen booth in the Tower. It was accessible through a sort of mini-quest, and once found served up a bit of lore in which Cayde himself reminisced about his love of it, and the City and the people who live in it. There was nothing more to it, though—just a touching remembrance of one of the game's best characters Gamers, though, being a naturally suspicious lot, suspected that there might be more to it than Bungie was letting on, and so many of them (myself included) held onto the coupons, despite their complete lack of worth. We were wrong, as it turns out: There was was nothing more to them, and in fact the coupons are slated to go away, along with a bunch of other items, when Bungie cleans house with the Beyond Light expansion.

The latest Division 2 patch addresses bugs with Control Point supply rooms and The Summit. The Division 2 servers on PC, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One are back online after a three-hour maintenance period during which developer Massive Entertainment deployed a new update. The full patch notes are detailed below. The notes in the update are largely the same as those found in last week's The Division 2 patch that ended the limited-time apparel event The Last Resort. As previously noted, all 29 cosmetics that could be acquired during the LTE can now be purchased with premium credits. Elsewhere in the update are fixes for various bugs, like those within Control Point supply rooms that cause them to remain locked even after killing the enemies in the area. Other fixes include issues with floors in The Summit missing objectives or having inoperable elevators and problems where recalibrating attributes would cause lower gear-score items to downgrade. Full The Division 2 Patch Notes Fixed an issue where Control Point supply rooms would remain locked after killing Rogue Agents in the activity. Fixed an issue where certain floors in The Summit would have missing objectives or inoperable elevators. Fixed an issue where Recalibrating Attributes onto lower gear-score items would also downgrade the recalibrated value. Fixed an issue where the Rate of Fire attribute in the Recalibration Station did not appear at its proper maximum. Last Resort apparel event is now closed and will no longer be available. Last Resort apparel items are available for purchase with Premium Credits. The Legacy cache will become available with a rotated selection of apparel. Apparel event outfits will be available for standalone purchase with a 25% discount. The Xbox Series S / Series X and PlayStation 5 launch on November 10 and November 12, respectively. While a dedicated next-gen port of The Division 2 isn't in the works, the game will be available on next-gen hardware thanks to backwards compatibility with cross-gen support. With only a week left until the new consoles drop, be sure to hit up our PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X / Series X preorder guide to learn if or when stores will be restocked for launch day.

game information What is it? An offroad racer with a splash of Tony Hawk’s that doesn’t like braking. Expect to pay $60/£45 Developer Codemasters Publisher Codemasters Reviewed on i7 9700K, RTX 2080 TI, 16GB RAM Multiplayer? Up to 12 Link Official site Who and what is Dirt 5 for? I’ve been asking myself this question a lot, as I race stony-faced along its forgettable gravel. I don’t know the answer, and I’m not sure Codemasters does either. After all, this is a series that made a name by injecting a bit of extreme sports culture into the Colin McRae Rally series, which was itself beginning to feel a bit warmed-up by 2007. Colin McRae: Dirt was fresh and fun, chucking its pacenotes out of the passenger window and doing a donut just because it felt like it. The problem, if you could call it that, is that recently Dirt Rally and its sequel came along. Lovely, straight-laced Dirt Rally. While Dirt’s deciding which snapback to wear for a night shotgunning beers in the motorhome with its bros, Dirt Rally’s finishing its geography homework and laying out its P.E. kit for the morning. And the thing is, it’s absolutely brilliant. So brilliant it reminded us how much we missed pacenotes, and ultra-realistic offroad handling, and drizzly Welsh lanes. Just like that, we like the old style of rally game again. The one Dirt was invented to revitalise. Which leaves number 5 without a clear raison d’etre. All the core elements, its essential Dirt-osity, were devised as a deliberate departure from sim-minded, realistic driving. But right now, as Dirt Rally 2 enjoys a passionate community and sim racing esports gains momentum, sim-minded, realistic driving is exactly where the excitement is. Of course, you might really fancy a non-taxing racer, where braking is genuinely optional and a familiar pyramid of events wraps itself around you from the career menu like a comfort blanket. We all fancy that sometimes, and Dirt 5 is those things, certainly—it’s just a very familiar version of those things. The handling model doesn’t want to step out at the back and have you wrestling to find balance. It wants to comply. You can toss most vehicles into most corners with a quick lift of the throttle and emerge more or less on the pace. And, ah yes, there’s the wadge of race events in the career mode menu, each with medals for arbitrary tasks like trading paint while drifting, or catching 5 seconds of air. As you’d expect, cars can be daubed in colours and vinyls and sponsor stickers until they’re ready to detach a retina on sight. While Forza Horizon’s creator mode seems to sap hours from you while you attempt the most basic design, Dirt 5’s tools are incredibly quick and easy. There’s less granular control over decal placement and dimensions than we’re perhaps used to, but I’ll take that if it means getting a 306 Maxi with glorious tricolore livery from menu to grid in a couple of minutes. From structure to track design to presentation to handling, it’s all exactly what you expect to find in a Dirt game, delivered without surprises or noticeable steps forward. Surprises aren’t in abundance on the track either. There’s a lot of fireworks and confetti and pyrotechnics going off as you hit a jump, but AI drivers don’t mix it with you or with each other as they would in a GRID game. It’s all a bit civilised, even in ice racing events, which prove something of a highlight throughout career mode for the demanding low-grip balancing act they ask of you. What you do get a sense of, as you plunge down the next hill or launch into an outrageously cambered hairpin, is geographical variation. There’s no missing the fact you’re racing in China, or Italy, or in Norway, or NYC—take a bow bamboo fields, Dolomites, snowcapped countryside and frozen streets, respectively. This sense of touring the world adds much-needed interest to your career since the different event types don’t distinguish themselves very clearly other than the infrequent 1v1 showdowns. It’s at this point that it should be acknowledged that a team of hundreds of people worked tirelessly and adapted to working at home in order to put this game out. Doing so is an achievement in itself, and despite some minor performance issues in the Steam review build, Dirt 5 doesn’t bear the scars of an unusual development process. That’s worth saying, I think. And as such it’s worth looking for the bits of great game in here, just underneath that old sock and these crumpled Sainsburys receipts. Yes—I can just about see a banger in here. Playgrounds, for example. Gymkhana has been a series staple for a while, and in Dirt 5 their hugely elevated level of challenge proves way more interesting than ticking off career events. These convoluted runs of perfection are like Trackmania on offroad tires, nerve-jangling to drive and at the whimsy of community content creators to bend in whatever shapes they like. In an alternate, and better, universe, Playground takes centre stage in Dirt 5’s career mode. In another one still, the current fantastical tracks of career mode remain intact, but it’s experienced through Dirt Rally 2’s super-demanding physics model. Dirt 5 isn’t a bad game, then. It’s not a Project CARS 3. The two make interesting points of comparison, though. Both take the bizarre decision to distance their IPs from sim racing at a time when it has never been more po[CENSORED]r, and possibly never will again, yes. But whereas Slightly Mad’s game seems to be jutting out its chin and actively daring you to find something of the franchise’s prior identity which you liked among its new mess of utterly characterless racing, Dirt 5 is guilty of the opposite. Instead of jettisoning its identity it’s playing too safe, holding onto it too closely in search of the apocryphal casual racing gamer who’s scared of brake pedals.

V4, amazing blur, text effect

Information What is it? The second part of a horror anthology, this time set in a town with a history of witchcraft Expect to pay £25/$30 Developer Supermassive Games Publisher Bandai Namco Reviewed on GTX 1080 Ti, Intel i7-8086K, 16GB RAM Multiplayer Yes Link Official site Cerebral, psychological horror is fine, but I like my scares to come from monster chases and stuff jumping out of the shadows. Idiots in peril, abandoned towns, maybe some supernatural shenanigans—that's where I get my thrills. Little Hope, the second game in Supermassive's Dark Pictures Anthology, has all of that, along with multiplayer modes that let it simultaneously capture the experience of watching and being inside a goofy horror flick with your pals. Like its predecessor, Man of Medan, it's through the cooperative modes that the game really reveals all of its mysteries. In singleplayer, you'll control different members of the a quintet, trapped in the haunted town of Little Hope by a seemingly magical fog and plagued by visions of 17th century witch trials. Who you play depends on the scene, and when the group splits up, which it frequently does, you're only going to see one of those paths. In the shared story, however, your co-op buddy will be on that other path, relaying what they find as they investigate ruined buildings or screaming as they're ambushed by a monster. I've been on both sides—the person listening and the person being attacked—but I'm struggling to pick which is more stressful. Listening to a friend being mauled really might be worse. You might be so far away that you can only listen to your friend panicking, unable to leap to their aid. In some cases, though, you'll get an opportunity to intervene, but that could be even worse. What if you mess up the quick time event and make a complete arse out of yourself? What if it's your fault that they're dead? That's going to put a real strain on the relationship. The frantic QTE action sequences made me feel like I was always just about to die, but they're actually quite easy going. To make them more accessible, Supermassive has added unobtrusive alerts ahead of the prompts, not just warning you that a QTE is coming, but letting you know what type of action you'll be doing. Jumping, attacking, shooting—they all have their own icon. This extra second to prepare doesn't diminish their impact, but it does make it less likely that you'll hit the wrong button just because you were surprised. Even if you do fail a QTE, you'll usually get a few opportunities to get the upper hand or escape, so one mistake won't result in your death. And that's why I was able to forgive my co-op buddy for all the failed rescues. Little Hope is a social game. You can enjoy it on your lonesome, but you'll miss out the best parts. You're meant to yell, throw out theories about why the gang is trapped and develop these characters together. After every surprise or near death experience, I found myself hitting pause so we could talk about what just happened and build the full picture from our individual perspectives. This was the magic that made Man of Medan work, too, and good co-op can make it easy to overlook places where the game is less refined. But Little Hope doesn't really develop it further, and it actually takes advantage of it less. Man of Medan's themes of paranoia were reflected in the co-op. You could, for instance, be standing in exactly the same room at the same time but actually seeing slightly different things. It sowed doubt and distrust. Little Hope has a more ambitious narrative, with different timelines and a more complex mystery to unravel, but that hasn't resulted in the kind of novel co-op tricks or twists that we saw in the last game. There's still drama and plenty of conflict between the characters, mind you. The gang is made up of three students in their 20s, a mature student and their professor. Two of them are secretly dating, but nobody really gets along that well in Little Hope. They're stressed, but they're also just kinda dicks, with one bland exception. They're familiar archetypes, like the vanilla do-gooder, the tense academic and the Karen. Being painted in such broad strokes makes it easier to slip into their personalities when you take control of them, though, and while none of these characters are particularly nuanced, most of them are fun roleplaying subjects. It's Angela, the Queen of Karens, who ends up being the most memorable. She is, entirely unexpectedly, great. Well, no, she's terrible, but she's a lot of fun to play. Within a few minutes of meeting her, you learn that she's planning on suing the university because their bus crashed, she absolutely despises the only other woman in the group (and the implication is that this is the case with most women), she has an unrelenting hunger for boy flesh and she's got a cutting remark or insult for every occasion. The bitter spinster is a tired trope, but Angela rules. I've thoroughly enjoyed calling everything and everyone bullshit on this harrowing adventure. She will gladly tell off a ghost, or follow up a traumatic event by putting some of her companions down. She's had it up to here with these damn kids and these damn ghosts. She did, I should add, improve over time, and when I finished my playthrough, everyone in the gang was willing to die for one another. It's a short game, clocking in at around four hours, but a lot of living, and a lot of dying, is squeezed into that time. The culmination of my choices was a third act full of heroic moments and the gang going toe-to-toe with their supernatural hunters. You can forge this ragtag group of students into a bunch of real badasses. If you can keep them alive. Between the QTEs and conversations are plenty of opportunities to explore, mostly by looking at objects the game clearly highlights. The camera has been freed up to give you more control as you wander around, letting you get a better look at the derelict, obviously haunted buildings that you keep breaking into. While there's not much in the way of conundrums, Supermassive uses the time to build up to some nasty surprises and tease some hints about what's really going on. Having another person to talk through your discovery with makes it feel like you're peeling back an elaborate mystery, even if you're really just clicking on a book or a photograph. Sometimes its cinematic notions get the better of it, however, and the camera abruptly switches to a dramatic angle, like you're being watched from some bushes. Perfectly fine for a movie, maybe, but every single time this happened, my co-op partner and I stopped in our tracks because we thought we'd hit a cutscene. There are quite a few awkward scene transitions, too, or places where the pace ramps up so quickly—and awkwardly—that it's not clear what the heck is going on. Most of the time, though, it's like being stuck in a schlocky but endearing horror movie. On the surface it's played straight, with little humour to break the tension, but really it revels in the absurdity of it all. It's Final Destination meets The Crucible, where you're watching yourself die one minute and attending a dimly lit witch trial the next. While it doesn't really expand on Supermassive's experiments in Man of Medan, it's still an entertaining co-op romp and perfectly timed if you're looking for a game to play this Halloween.

Who out there has driven a Cadillac Cimarron? Show of hands? Sorry, but we can't count those pressed up against the bottom of a casket lid. Which is a tasteless (sorry!) way of saying most of those people are possibly dead, except for me. And I actually tested one, a 1987. People seem to think we were impressed by the smallest Cadillac of the time, like we were actually amazed by the brand's biggest turd ever. But speaking for myself, we saw it for what it was: A re-badged Chevrolet Cavalier with a noisy V6 eventually replacing the less-noisy-by-two-cylinders four-cylinder. Buyers wanted something small, and it was small, and they wanted Cadillac quality, as if the laborers on the line made sure to tighten every bolt on the Cimarron, and only the ones absolutely necessary on the Cavalier. Which, looking back at my father's that-era Cavalier, might explain a lot. Every time Cadillac debuts a new small car, pundits--and they know who they are-- bring up the Cimarron, though it's been dead since 1988, as an example of how tough it's been for the brand to build a small car. The Catera and CTS didn't count, but the ATS did. Though it received critical praise for its powertrains and handling, it got an equal amount of dings for its interior quality and room. In the end, it was largely ignored by buyers. With effective replacement for the ATS, the new CT4, we can finally call a moratorium on any Cimarron comparisons. This is a very thoughtfully executed little car. 2020 Cadillac CT4-V, By the Numbers Base price (as tested): $44,495 ($48,815) Powertrain: 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with a 10-speed automatic transmission Horsepower: 325 at 5,500 rpm Torque: 380 pound-feet at 1,500 rpm Fuel economy (MPG): 20 city/ 28 highway/ 23 combined Curb Weight: 3,780 pounds 0 to 60 mph: (observed): 5.9 seconds My test model was nicely optioned, including all-wheel-drive for the bargain upgrade price of $500. And it was the V-Series, which replaces the 2.0-liter turbo engine with a larger one. Pop the hood and you think: Man, that's a big four-cylinder, and it is--2.7 liters, leaving no room under the hood for the battery, which has been relocated to the left side of the trunk floor. What, did this engine come from a truck or something? Why yes, it did, and from the full-sized GM line. This helps explain why maximum torque, 380 pound-feet, happens at just 1,500 rpm. But the only time the 325-horse engine feels truckish is when in restarts from auto-off, which will send you to the button that keeps the engine running at idle. It's not especially pleasing to the ears, but then again, very few turbo fours these days really are. The platform, similar to the ATS but heavily tweaked, is a mild revelation. The CT4-V corners without drama, even in the "Comfort" setting; all suspensions are a compromise, but Cadillac hits a happy medium here, making this a daily commuter, with a "Track" setting that will allow you to have some fun on weekends. Steering is remarkably neutral with just the right amount of feel; brakes are linear and competent. The run-flat Continental tires are, surprisingly up for some fairly serious twisty roads. Mileage is not glorious for a four-cylinder--an EPA-rated 20 mpg city, 28 highway, and 23 overall, which I was not able to match, with 21.2 the best I could muster. That, however, was on a lot of two-lane highways filled with gravel trucks, which need passing, and that's the next paragraph. This engine, though it never sounds particularly invigorating, is, since it's mated to the excellent 10-speed automatic transmission. It shifts more often than I do making capital letters on this computer, and that's a good thing, as it is unobtrusive and maximizes the engine's power. My 0-to-60 mph test results were at or just under six seconds, but it's past 60 that this powertrain wants to just keep on pulling. And it has a chassis to match all that energy. The "summer only" run-flat tires - 235/40R 18 XL Continental Sport Contact SSRs--are grippy, quieter than expected on smooth asphalt, louder than expected on porous pavement. The suspension is taut, seldom punishing. There's "Sport" and "Track" mode, but I just left it in Comfort mode most of the time. If felt just as fast, and kept the transmission from pulling on its leash like a pit bull. Outside, the nose and the profile are fine, but there's a droopy-drawers aspect to the rear that I suspect some Cadillac designer might want to take another swing at. Inside, upholstery is handsome charcoal with orange stitching, and while each piece of the interior seems fine, there's a slightly gloomy and inexplicable cumulative effect in there. Seats are comfortable and supportive except need more side bolstering. The CT4 is tight for four-six footers, who, in the rear, will have their knees pressed into the hard, indented front seats. Trunk space is adequate, and the trunk lid is nicely weighted, and the hood has a pair of hydraulic struts. The CT4's analog gauges look far better than the much-derided analog ones on the old ATS, but they exist in a time when flashy digital gauges are the norm in the luxury world. Cadillac still feels behind the curve there. But it's finally where it needs to be with its infotainment system--it's as fast and user-friendly as any of GM's other cars, which are quite solid these days. The days of CUE are finally far behind us, and that's cause for celebration. The basic platform and the powertrain make the CT4 V a winner, and I'm not the only one who thinks so: The car recently beat out a BMW M235i xDrive Grand Coupe, and a Mercedes-AMG A35 4Matic in the October issue of Car and Driver, confirming to some readers that this is indeed the end of days, and other readers to think, maybe Caddy can build a small car. Not cheaply, though--the list on our car was $48,815, which isn't really that expensive, either. The CT4's biggest competition probably won't be any 2 Series or A3, however. Most likely it'll be up against Cadillac's own crossovers. But for those who want a smaller Caddy that's closer to the ground, the CT4 is their best choice yet. It's For You, If: You want an authentic compact sports sedan with a fine suspension and what actually feels like more than 325 horsepower; want something comparable (and it is) to European cars but you want to buy American (made in Lansing, Michigan, with an American engine and transmission); you're willing to try to stay close to the $44,495, since it's already loaded and at that price, it's a bargain. It's Not For You, If: You are bothered by the slightly cobby engine vibration and sound; you want a car that can regularly carry two passengers in the rear, if they are medium or large; you don't mind the slightly melted styling out back; you think "four-cylinder" means great fuel mileage, because it doesn't in this configuration. Early Verdict: Should test the "if you build it, they will come" theory. This is a car Cadillac has been trying to build for decades.

The White House has accused leading infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci of playing politics days before the election in an interview about the coronavirus pandemic. Dr Fauci told the Washington Post the US was in for a "whole lot of hurt". He also offered an assessment of how both President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, Joe Biden, are approaching the pandemic. The US has recorded more deaths and cases than any other country. According to data collated by Johns Hopkins University, deaths in the US have now passed 230,000, while more than nine million cases have been registered. In his interview with the Post published on Saturday night, Dr Fauci warned that "all the stars are aligned in the wrong place as you go into the fall and winter season, with people congregating at home indoors." "You could not possibly be positioned more poorly," he said. When asked about the approaches of the two presidential candidates, Dr Fauci said Mr Biden was "taking it seriously from a public health perspective", while Mr Trump was "looking at it from a different perspective… the economy and reopening the country". He said the US needed to make an "abrupt change" in public health practices and behaviours. The comments drew a sharp rebuke from the White House, which accused Dr Fauci of attempting to bolster Mr Biden's bid for the presidency. Spokesman Judd Deere said the comments were "unacceptable and breaking with all norms". "As a member of the [US Coronavirus] Task Force, Dr Fauci has a duty to express concerns or push for a change in strategy, but he's not done that, instead choosing to criticise the president in the media and make his political leanings known by praising the president's opponent," he added in a statement. Coronavirus has been a central issue in the run-up to Tuesday's presidential election. Mr Biden has called the president's handling of the coronavirus pandemic an "insult" to its victims. The Democratic candidate - who has not ruled out further lockdowns - pledged to "let science drive our decisions" if he is elected. "Even if I win, it's going to take a lot of hard work to end this pandemic," he told voters this week. "I do promise this: We will start on day one doing the right things." At a rally in Goodyear, Arizona, Mr Trump warned that a Biden presidency would lead to more lockdowns and economic misery for Americans. "If you vote for Joe Biden it means no kids in school, no graduations, no weddings, no thanksgivings, no Christmas, and no Fourth of July together. "Other than that you'll have a wonderful life. Can't see anybody, but that's alright," he said. He cast the election as "a choice between a Trump super-recovery and a Biden depression". Mr Biden has been observing Covid protocols at events ahead of the vote, while Mr Trump has been staging large campaign rallies without social distancing measures. Mr Biden has a solid national lead over the Republican president, but his advantage is narrower in the handful of US states that could vote either way and ultimately decide who wins the White House.

V2 , text effect

"I would love to reprise the role. It's one of my favourite things that I've ever done" There's a lotta people in Watch Dogs Legion, so many that you can afford to be petty and picky about who you recruit. But while Aiden Pearce and Wrench return from the series past, there's still no sign of Watch Dogs 2 protagonist Marcus Holloway ever making his way to Camden Town. Speaking to IGN, voice actor Ruffin Prentiss explained that he'd be happy to return to the role. Unfortunately, Ubisoft never got in touch about bringing the character back for Legion. "I would love to reprise the role," said Prentiss. "It's one of my favourite things that I've ever done. When Aiden was announced I was like, ‘Oh, maybe there's a potential.’" Pearce, a man with the personality of scuffed cardboard, arrives as a season pass character for Legion alongside three other operatives—an Assassin's Creed assassin, an actual psychic, and Wrench, the emoji-goggles-wearing loudmouth from the last game. "He's my main partner in crime in Watch Dogs 2. So I think the realm of possibility still exists, but I have heard nothing from Ubisoft – but if they call, I'd absolutely jump back in.” Prentiss doesn't appear to resent Marcus' omission, praising actor Shawn Baichoo's "wonderful, fluid, and versatile" performance in the role. Even so, there's been a clamour for Marcus' return since Ubisoft made it clear they'd bring back returning characters, with Prentiss receiving messages from fans asking for the leading lad to come back. "The fans, the way they received Wrench, absolutely valid. We had a fun time making that game, but it's one of those things where, even when he was announced, I'm getting messages like, ‘Hey, is Marcus coming?’” The interview does touch on an interesting tidbit regarding the wider franchise, mind. Apparently, one writer had plans for getting three or four protagonists established before pulling them all together for an "Avengers"-style team-up. Considering the almost superhero origin-story ending of the first game, it doesn't even seem that far-fetched. For now, it looks like Marcus won't be crossing the pond anytime soon. Probably for the best, anyway—Christopher would probably find some.

V2, Text effect

➥Age: 20 ➥Contact(Steam, TS3, Discord etc): TS3 / Forum ➥Experience in Adobe Photoshop(Months or years): 4years ➥Obligatory attach your Gallery link (If you have one): Here ➥Any other editing program you use?: Nah just Photoshop. ➥What version of Photoshop do you mostly use?: Photoshop CS6 ➥In what section you have your most contribution?: Gifts section & Requests. ➥Have you read all the sections' rules?: Yeah ➥Have you read the community rules?: Yeah of course ➥What/Who inspired you to work in Photoshop or/and to want to be a Designer here?: Im Old GFX ➥What can you say about you that will make us interested about your Photoshop skills & experience?(Minimum 10 words): --

There's no stopping the second wave of coronavirus, it seems, despite a bundle of new rules designed to do just that. Infection rates are rising rapidly, with estimates suggesting up to 100,000 people a day may be catching the virus. Across the Channel, France has admitted its regional approach is not working, by announcing a new national lockdown. Germany, to a lesser extent, is also planning one. Wales is in the middle of a short "fire-breaker" lockdown, in which bars, restaurants, churches and most shops have shut for a fortnight. So is a full-on UK-wide lockdown only a matter of time? The scientists certainly think so Many of those advising government have given it their backing. Sir Jeremy Farrar, a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), which advises ministers, says it should have happened already - and definitely needs to now. Any delay, he said, will be costly and will mean later restrictions will be "harder and longer". The tools we have at our disposal are not proving effective, said Dr Duncan Robertson, a disease modeller at Loughborough University. The test-and trace-system, designed to nip outbreaks in the bud, can't cope, he said. The service has consistently failed to reach enough close contacts of people who test positive. It's just a "matter of time" before a lockdown is introduced, he believes. …although Downing Street doesn't The government, though, seems determined to hold out - with ministers in England saying publicly they want to stick to their regional approach which has seen areas placed into one of three tiers each with different level of restrictions. There is not much in the data to suggest it might be effective yet - although one glimmer of hope could be in the slowing of hospital admissions in the North West. In Scotland the targeting of its central belt also appears to be having an impact. Death numbers could force a change of policy If the virus continues to spread, deaths will rise too, Dr Robertson said. "How many deaths would the public accept? I think they would soon become too large to bear." Robert West, a professor in health psychology, and a government adviser, agrees. He said the rising numbers will have a huge "emotional impact", forcing a full lockdown. He dismissed the idea put forward by some that the public have become "desensitised" to the situation. So just how bad could deaths get? This week has seen reported deaths top 300 a day twice with the weekly average standing at 230. That compares with a peak of more than 1,000 in April. One scenario produced for the government over the summer - a "reasonable worst case" - suggested total deaths could reach 120,000 from September to the end of March, with cases peaking in January before the virus burns out. That would be treble what was seen during the spring peak. But it is only a scenario, based on the worst assumptions and without taking into account people changing their behaviour, extra restrictions or improved treatments having an effect. Prof Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University, says such projections should be treated with extreme caution. He believes the focus on the daily reported Covid death figures, which just count the people who have died with 28 days of a positive test, is "distorting" the debate. There needs to be more focus on different measures of mortality, he says, such as how many extra people are dying. One way of doing that is to look at the death rate adjusted for age and size of the po[CENSORED]tion. If you do that for the first wave - the year to the end of August - the death rate in 2020 is worse than in previous years. But go back just over a decade and you will find a comparably deadly year, as this graph shows.

The definitive collection of Battlefield ™ V content has arrived. Battlefield ™ V Definitive Edition, available for digital download from October 22, offers the ultimate WWII experience. Get Battlefield V Definitive Edition Experience the greatest conflict in history on land, in the air and at sea with all gameplay content unlocked from the get-go. Choose from a variety of weapons, vehicles, and gadgets, then dive into the fierce battles of WWII. Stand out on the battlefield with the full elite roster and the best customization items from Years 1 and 2. The Final Edition of Battlefield V contains the base game Battlefield V and the Definitive Collection of Content: All In-Game Content - Obtain all weapons, vehicles, and gadgets from Launch, Year 1, and Year 2, including the Devastating Bazooka and the Lunge Mine. All Elites - Infuse the battlefield with personality with Elites like Seamus and Ilse, who feature unique looks, character and melee weaponry. 84 Immersive Camouflage Outfits - Upgrade your WWII sandbox with outfits like the Sandman and Aristocrat for the British and German armies. 8 Soldier of the Year 2 outfits - Including Officer and Tommy outfits. 2 Year 2 Weapon Skins - Sport the Pacific Palm and Snakebite weapon skins, applicable to 10 and 4 weapons respectively. 3 Vehicle Decorations - Give your vehicles a unique style with the Headlight skins for the American Sherman and Ready for War for the German Panzer IV. 33 Year 1 Chapter Rewards - Unlock the Napalm weapon set, German Baron von Zorn outfit, and more. Note regarding Battlefield V Year 2 Edition: With the release of Battlefield V Final Edition, the Year 2 Edition will no longer be available for purchase. Live the Pacific War. Fight on the devastating battlefields of Europe and North Africa. Choose from a comprehensive arsenal. Showcase the best personalization elements. Deploy today with the Final Edition of Battlefield V. * CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS APPLY. MORE INFORMATION AT WWW.EA.COM/FR-FR/LEGAL. See you on the battlefield and on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Discord, and the Battlefield Forums. Subscribe to receive emails with news, offers and more about Battlefield and other EA products. This announcement is subject to change based on community feedback and the development of our service and content. We will do our best to provide as much information as possible to our community.