DiDИ

happy bday my lil manager

hello, that's not a problem , anyway the others gave you some points but make sure that you will make activity in that section T/C

Due to inactivity of the person who requested help, topic will be closed in 2 days! T/C

happy birthday mate !

Attackers encrypted user's devices, and typically demanded a ransom of $300-600 in Bitcoin The US and UK governments have said North Korea was responsible for the WannaCry malware attack affecting hospitals, businesses and banks across the world earlier this year. The attack is said to have hit more than 300,000 computers in 150 nations, causing billions of dollars of damage. It is the first time the US and UK have officially blamed them for the worm. Thomas Bossert, an aide to US President Donald Trump, first made the accusation in the Wall Street Journal newspaper. Mr Bossert, who advises the president on homeland security, said the allegation was "based on evidence". He did not produce any evidence in the article, but said US findings concurred with judgments from other governments and private companies. He added that Australia, Canada, and New Zealand also share the US conclusion that North Korea was behind the attack. Following the interview, the UK Foreign Office also blamed "North Korean actors using their cyber programme to circumvent sanctions". The National Cyber Security Centre assessed that is "highly likely" that the North Korean Lazarus hacking group had committed the attacks, Minister for Cyber Lord Ahmad said in a statement. In May, Windows computers hit by the cyber-attack had their contents locked, with users asked to a pay a ransom to have their data restored. EU police body Europol called the scale of the attack "unprecedented". Why blame N Korea now? Analysis: Gordon Corera, BBC security correspondent Britain's National Cyber Security Centre, part of the GCHQ signals intelligence agency, first attributed the May 2017 Wannacry attack to North Korea within weeks of the ransomware spreading. The speed was because the UK led the international investigation after the National Health Service was hit hard. The US intelligence community may have taken longer to concur with that assessment but there is still the question of why the White House is only going public now. Governments used to be cautious about attribution in cyber attacks but it is becoming increasingly common - beginning with the claim North Korea was behind the attack on Sony in 2014 and more recently involving Russia's alleged hacking in the 2016 US election. This latest claim is almost certainly an attempt to put more pressure on North Korea in the crisis over its nuclear programme with the attempt to rally international support behind the notion that the country is a real danger - whether from cyber weapons or nuclear weapons. And to make the case that further action, of some kind, needs to be contemplated. Mr Bossert warned that "we will continue to hold accountable those who harm or threaten us" In the Wall Street Journal piece, Mr Bossert said North Korea must be held "accountable" and that the US would continue to use a "maximum pressure strategy" to hinder the regime's ability to mount cyber-attacks. He did not specify what action, if any, the US government planned to take in response to the findings. North Korea is already facing major economic sanctions after being redesignated a state-sponsor of terrorism last month amid tension over its nuclear programme and missile tests. "North Korea has acted especially badly, largely unchecked, for more than a decade, and its malicious behaviour is growing more egregious. WannaCry was indiscriminately reckless," Mr Bossert wrote. "As we make the internet safer, we will continue to hold accountable those who harm or threaten us, whether they act alone or on behalf of criminal organisations or hostile nations," he went on. "The tool kits of totalitarian regimes are too threatening to ignore." He added that Microsoft and Facebook both acted to disable North Korean cyber-attacks "on their own initiative last week, without any direction or participation by the US". Microsoft later issued a statement, saying that last week the company "working together with Facebook and others in the security community, took strong steps to protect our customers and the internet from ongoing attacks by an advanced persistent threat actor known to us as ZINC, also known as the Lazarus Group". "Among other steps, last week we helped disrupt the malware this group relies on, cleaned customers' infected computers, disabled accounts being used to pursue cyber-attacks and strengthened Windows defences to prevent reinfection," the statement said. However, some social media users said that - while crediting Microsoft and Facebook - Mr Bossert did not mention a UK security researcher who had "accidentally" halted the spread of the malicious software. The 22-year-old man, known by the pseudonym MalwareTech, managed to bring the spread to a halt when he found what appeared to be a "kill switch" in the rogue software's code.

Nerazzurri fans are welcomed here

welcome to newlife

that's the point from opening topics with title T/C

Due to inactivity of the person who requested help, topic will be closed in 2 days! T/C

hello, we can't help you if your setinfo has been changed , speak with manager of the server to solve that T/C

hello, follow my steps may it will work right click on the game

same problem was here guys that is the point from the title. T/C

US President Donald Trump will recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital, senior administration officials have said. He is due to announce the controversial decision in a speech later. Mr Trump is also expected to approve moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, but not for several years. Israel welcomes the changes but the Palestinians and Arab leaders have warned they will jeopardise any Middle East peace process. Pope Francis called for the "status quo" to be respected. Dialogue would only come through "recognising the rights of all people" in the region, he said. Saudi Arabia, an ally of the US, called the new policy "a flagrant provocation to Muslims". Israel has always regarded Jerusalem as its capital city, while the Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. In recognising Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the US becomes the first country to do so since the foundation of the state in 1948. What is so contentious about Jerusalem's status? The issue goes to the heart of Israel's conflict with the Palestinians, who are backed by the Arab and wider Islamic world. The city is home to key religious sites sacred to Judaism, Islam and Christianity, especially in East Jerusalem. Israel annexed the sector from Jordan after the 1967 Middle East war and regards the entire city as its indivisible capital. According to the 1993 Israel-Palestinian peace accords, its final status is meant to be discussed in the latter stages of talks. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem has never been recognised internationally and all countries maintain their embassies in Tel Aviv. Since 1967, Israel has built a dozen settlements, home to about 200,000 Jews, in East Jerusalem. These are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this. In recognising Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the US could reinforce Israel's position that settlements in the east are valid Israeli communities. What is the US proposing? Trump administration officials said recognising Jerusalem as Israel's capital was seen as "a recognition of reality" by the US government. However, specific boundaries of the city would remain subject to a final status agreement, the official said. The status of holy sites would not be affected. Mr Trump would also direct the state department to begin the process of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem - but this could take several years as it still has to be designed and built and security concerns would need to be addressed. He originally promised the move to pro-Israel voters during his campaign for the presidency. The US officials added that the president would still sign a regular waiver blocking the embassy's move from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem until the new building was completed. Successive presidents have signed waivers to get round the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act, which mandates moving the embassy. They have done this so that the US can be seen as neutral in Middle East peace negotiations. Mr Trump has vowed to pursue a peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians, led by his son-in-law and top adviser Jared Kushner. An administration official said the new US policy on Jerusalem was not designed to favour Israel in that process. What has world reaction been? Palestinian protesters burned pictures of Donald Trump on Tuesday Image captionPalestinian protesters burned pictures of Donald Trump on Tuesday Ahead of his formal announcement, Mr Trump phoned several regional leaders to inform them of the embassy move. Reacting to news of his impending announcement: Saudi Arabia's King Salman told Mr Trump the relocation of the embassy or recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital "would constitute a flagrant provocation of Muslims, all over the world" The Palestinians' UK representative, Manuel Hassassian, speaking to the BBC, said the changes would be the "kiss of death" to the two-state peace solution and amounted to declaring war in the Middle East Hamas leader Ismail Haniya called for protests this Friday UK Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, said he viewed the reports of what Mr Trump would say "with concern" Jordan's King Abdullah said the decision would "undermine efforts to resume the peace process" Egypt's President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi urged Mr Trump "not to complicate the situation in the region" Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said his country could sever ties with Israel China warned of an escalation in tensions in the Middle East US government employees and their families have been barred from personal travel in Jerusalem's Old City and the West Bank for security reasons ahead of expected protests. Israel's intelligence minister Israel Katz told Army Radio that Israel was "preparing for every option", including an outbreak of violence. France, the European Union and the Arab League have also expressed concern. No sign it's a bargaining chip Analysis by Barbara Plett-Usher, state department correspondent, BBC News By recognising Jerusalem as Israel's capital President Trump is fulfilling a campaign promise. There is no other obvious reason he is doing this now. Administration officials said he would simply be acknowledging reality - that Jerusalem functions as Israel's capital. They said the decision would not determine final status issues such as boundaries and sovereignty - that is still left to negotiations. On other core issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Arab and Muslim leaders may be able to work with changes in the US approach but Jerusalem is also holy land, not just a disputed capital. Jordan and Saudi Arabia are custodians of Islam's holy sites and have issued strong warnings that this move could inflame the Muslim world. There is also no indication that this is a bargaining chip to advance the peace process: according to the officials, President Trump is not expected to publicly endorse a two-state solution. It sounds like the Palestinians will get nothing. Perhaps there is a wider strategy at work but it looks like a workaround so the president can satisfy his pro-Israel voters.

relax , everything change good things never stay forever