I agree with Elle Hunt’s view that the perceived intelligence of an animal shouldn’t determine whether or not we eat them (Octopus farming turns my stomach – but are some species really more worthy than others?, 30 March). She is absolutely right that our idea of intelligence is biased towards human abilities, accounting for neither those cognitive areas in which animals outperform humans, nor those animals who simply haven’t been put through “intelligence tests” yet.
So, I find her conclusion – that we should eat higher-quality, more local meat – slightly baffling. Absolutely, we should avoid factory-farmed meat (both terrestrial and aquaculture), but we are kidding ourselves if we believe that there is any humane way to slaughter livestock or club octopuses. A general rule of thumb: if something becomes appalling and unconscionable when you imagine it being done to a human, it should not be done to any other animal, either – at least not by choice.
The American novelist Jonathan Safran Foer showed in his book Eating Animals that the trip to the slaughterhouse and the journey down the assembly line are full of fear and suffering, even for those animals who live (truncated) “free-range” lives. George Monbiot has likewise pointed out that organic, pasture-fed meat is not a solution.
The clear and obvious solution is for those of us who have a choice in what we eat each day to simply adopt a nutritious, plant-based diet and abstain from meat altogether – the kind with legs and the kind with fins. Once we accept that responsibility, we can start making real progress.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/apr/05/we-shouldnt-eat-animals-whether-they-are-intelligent-or-not