Mr.SnaPeR

v2 text and blur

its renogare soft https://www.dafont.com/renogare-soft.font well you know that i put space beside every letter right ?

Hey about accounts problem you can contact any administrator by doing a support ticket don't make it here T/C

US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has taken the extra step of rebuking President Donald Trump's criticism of a federal judge. Mr Trump on Tuesday called a jurist who ruled against his asylum policy an "Obama judge". The president's gibe provoked a Stern statement from the head of America's highest court. Mr Trump has denied his comments, saying Chief Justice Roberts is wrong. It is the first time the chief justice has spoken against Mr Trump. "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Chief Justice Roberts told the Associated Press. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated sentences doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them." Speaking on the eve of America's Thanksgiving holiday, he said an "independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for". Mr Trump responded on Twitter on Wednesday, saying the top justice was wrong and that "Obama judges ... have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country." He suggested that the 9th Circuit Court, where a federal judge blocked his recent immigration proclamation, opposed his policies on border and safety.How rare is this? It is extremely rare for a senior member of the judiciary to clash with a US president. Chief Justice Roberts' Supreme Court college Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been a far more outspoken critic of Mr Trump. Why half of America panics when this woman falls ill Why US top court is more political than UK's Confidence in US judicial 'diminishing' In 2016, the liberal judge apologized for calling Mr Trump a "faker" in an interview after coming under fire for commenting on a candidate as a jurist. Mr Trump has previously lambasted federal judges for ruling against his policies. In 2017, he called a federal jurist who reversed his controversial travel ban a "so-called judge" with a "ridiculous" opinion. Why did Chief Justice Roberts speak out? Chief Justice Roberts - who was appointed to lead the court in 2005 by President George W Bush - was responding to the news agency's request for reaction to Mr Trump's remark a day earlier. The Republican president had spoken out following US District Judge Jon Tigar's ruling against a presidential executive order denying unlawful migrants the right to seek asylum, calling the 9th Circuit "a disgrace". "I'm going to put in a major complaint because you can not win - if you're us - a case in the 9th Circuit and I think it's a disgrace," Mr Trump told reporters outside the White House. "This was an Obama judge. And I'll tell you what, it's not going to happen like this anymore." Politicalising an impartial judicial Analysis by Anthony Zurcher, BBC News Members of the Supreme Court - in fact, the whole of the federal judiciary- like to think of themselves as above and apart from the tumult of American politics. For some time, however, such an idea has been honored more in the breach than the observation, with courts often becoming mired in fiercely partisan matters. The politicization of the judicial is now reaching a crescendo, as Donald Trump reiterated the questions the impartiality and motives of judges. The president is, with his comments, apparently chipping away at the authority of a co-equal branch of government. That may be why the president's latest fusillade against an "Obama judge" prompted a rare and direct rebuke from the head of the judiciary, John Roberts. The pointed statement seems destined to set off another round of criticism directed at the chief justice, who - after his 2012 ruling upholding the constitutionality of Obamacare - many Trump supporters feel is insupportably loyal to their cause. The president was very quick, via Twitter, to call recent lower-court decisions suspending his immigration policies "dangerous and unwise". That the normally cautious jurist felt compelled to speak out underscores just how fraught the current situation has been. Was Mr. Trump talking about? This most recent feud with the judiciary relates to the large group of Central American migrants making their way to the US-Mexico border. Mr Trump had ramped up his rhetoric around the "caravan" of migrants during the mid-term election season, calling the group "an invasion". Judge halts Trump'sylum ban He signed a proclamation on 9 November saying that anyone who wants to claim asylum in the US has to come in through official points of entry - and their cases will not be heard if they enter illegally. A statement at the time said: "We are using the authority granted to us by Congress to bar aliens who violate a presidential suspension of entry or other restriction from asylum eligibility." What's the current situation at the border? Mr Trump deployed military troops to help secure the US-Mexico border at the end of last month. On Wednesday, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said he has been given authority to use military force to protect border officials. This could involve soldiers killing migrants temporarily if any disorder or violence breaks out, according to the Associated Press. About 3,000 members of the caravan have so far arrived in Tijuana, the Mexican city bordering the US, and authorities expect numbers to reach 10,000 in coming weeks. What is the migrant caravan heading to US? A river of people: The migrant caravan in pictures On Tuesday, the Pentagon released a report to Congress saying the deployment of around 5,900 active-duty troops would cost about $ 72m (£ 56m), plus the $ 138m (£ 108m) already spent on 2,100 National Guard troops on border missions since April . In addition, more than $ 80m (£ 62m) has been spent to process thousands of migrant children separated from parents under the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" crackdown earlier this year, report US media. Mr Trump eventually backed down on the policy that saw over 2,000 migrant children taken away from adults at the US-Mexico border between May and June. Around 140 children remain in government custody as of this week.

v1 text and brush

US President Donald Trump has consistently defended ties with Saudi Arabia despite international condemnation of journalist Jamal Khashoggi's murder. The kingdom is a "steadfast partner" that has agreed to invest "a record amount of money" in the US, Mr Trump said in a statement. The president acknowledged Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman "could very well" have known about Khashoggi's murder. "In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," he added. Mr Khashoggi was murdered on 2 October on a visit to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. The journalist who vanished into a consulate The Jamal Khashoggi story so far Khashoggi murder: Is Saudi crown prince finished? Saudi Arabia has blamed the killing on rogue agents but denied claims that the crown prince had knowledge of the operation. US media have reported that the CIA believes Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder. Mr Trump's statement said: "[It] could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge of this tragic event - maybe he did and maybe he did not!" Later on Tuesday, Mr Trump said that the CIA had not made a "100%" determination on the killing. In an interview on Sunday, the president told Fox News that he had refused to listen to a recording of Khashoggi's murder provided by Turkey, calling it "a suffering tape". What does the statement say? "The world is a very dangerous place!", Mr Trump states, before holding up Saudi Arabia as an ally of the US against Iran. The kingdom spent "billions of dollars in leading the fight against Radical Islamic Terrorism" whereas Iran has "killed many Americans and other innocent people through the Middle East", it says. The statement also stresses Saudi investment commitments and arms purchases. "If we foolishly cancel these contracts, Russia and China would be the overwhelming beneficaries," it adds. While admitting the murder of Jamal Khashoggi was "terrible", Mr Trump wrote that "we may never know all of the facts" about his death. "The United States intends to remain a steadfast partner of Saudi Arabia to ensure the interests of our country, Israel and all other partners in the region." Mr Trump later said he would meet Mohammed bin Salman at a G20 meeting in Argentina next week if the crown prince attended. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has backed his president, saying after talks with Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu that "it's a mean, nasty world out there" and that Mr. Trump was "obliged to adopt policies that further America's national security". Mr Cavusoglu said that co-operation with the US on the issue was "not where we want it". In a statement, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein said she was shocked the president was not going to punish Mohammed bin Salman over the "premeditated murder" of Khashoggi. The essence of America First By Anthony Zurcher, BBC senior North America reporter Donald Trump is a different kind of president, and now is that more clear than in his foreign policy, exclusion points and all. His release on the death of Jamal Khashoggi is remarkable for many reasons, and not just its blunt language. The president quickly tries to change the subject to Iran. He dismisses reports that Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder with a possible-he-did, maybe-he-didn't shrug. He cites the economic impact of $ 450bn in investment and arms sales to the Saudis, although much of that is little more than paper promises. Perhaps most jarring is his casual observation that the Saudis viewed Khashoggi - a permanent US resident - as an "enemy of the state" with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Mr Trump has distilled his "America First" worldview down to its very essence. Morality and global leadership take a back seat to perceived US economic and military security. Read more from Anthony How will the statement play out internationally? What the take-away will be in the Middle East and beyond is a serious issue, says BBC diplomatic correspondant Jonathan Marcus. US policy in the region is so closely aligned with that of two key individuals - Mohammed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia and PM Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel - that it is increasingly hard to see how the US can play a role as an independent arbiter, our correspondent says. Mr Trump's narrow, interests-based approach will further dismay Washington's allies in the West, he argues, reinforcing those in Moscow and Beijing who are already applying a "Russia First" and a "China First" approach in international affairs. Who are the Saudis blaming? Last week the Saudi public prosecutor blamed the murder on an unnamed intelligence officer who was allegedly tasked with persuading Khashoggi to return to the Gulf kingdom. A total of 11 people have been charged over the murder, and plaintiffs are seeking the death penalty for five of them. Their cases have been referred to a court while investigations into another 10 people suspected of involvement continue. Where does the US stand on the murder? Although the CIA is not said to have direct evidence linking Mohammed bin Salman to the murder, officials reportedly believe it could not have taken place without its approval. But at the weekend, the state department said the US government was still to reach a final conclusion on the killing, with "numerous unanswered questions" remaining. The US - along with major powers such as France and Britain - has continued to sell arms to Saudi Arabia. But on Monday the German government said it was blocking all arms deliveries to the kingdom, even those that had been previously approved.

Hello have a nice day well your cs is warzone so look i suggest downloading this cs its cs lh 2013 its better for windows 7 this cs is better for Windows 7 if this didnt work reply here again and we will help you ! Regards

Hey you are in the wrong section this section is not for design it's about community problems any way if you wanna to post a topic about design or ask for help in Photoshop go post here https://csblackdevil.com/forums/index.php?/forum/378-assistance/ T /C

julian Gollop is back. The man who designed Laser Squad and its spiritual success XCOM (or UFO in Europe), is taking another crack at making a tactics game with Phoenix Point. It is a return to form for the genre as it sees Golop is going to add back a lot of the depth and complexity that has been missing in the recent wave of tactics games. While I liked the Firaxis XCOM quite a lot when it came out in 2012, it was not without its flaws. When Firaxis scrubbed off some of the clunkier and more esoteric aspects of the original game they also, unfortunately, managed to shave off a great deal of the depth in its gameplay. Mostly, it was the strategic aspect of the game that suffered. In, 1994 you had to juggle multiple bases, staffs, research teams and hangars full of jet planes and strike teams. You needed to keep track of inventory for things like ammo, grenades and other equipment. There was a sense that things were more simulated than just a choice between mission A, B or C. It felt like you were playing against different systems interacting and a real adversary instead of just getting random missions. Looking back at the 2012 XCOM now, there simply were very few strategic choices to make between missions which made it a tad stiffer and more boring than its predecessors. Phoenix Point is, it would seem, aiming to remedy this by reinstating a slew of the old mechanics and adding some of its very own. The recent test build let you play around with a limited version of the strategic map. You start in North America and have access to a base and a dropship that you can fly around. Although currently barebones, it is obvious that Phoenix Point will offer a great deal more detail and depth in how it handles the strategic layer of the game compared to what modern XCOM, or other tactics games, do. Around your ship, you have a yellow circle that tells you how far you can travel on your current fuel and destinations will have a dotted line around them if your fuel is not enough to take you there and back again. As you fly to different spots on the map events pop up, it can be finding other factions, scavenging for resources and of course encounter enemies. If a fact is friendly towards you, you can build a refueling station there to expand your reach, if not you can force them to give it to you instead. How important these things will be hard to tell at this point since most of the economy, base building and diplomacy is still to be implemented, but what is there looks like it could be very interesting indeed. As you encounter enemies, you will be taken to one of a selection of random maps to do battle on and here the game will be instantly recognizable for a season XCOM player. The UI is actually eerily similar to the 2012 remake, and that is a good thing. If there was one thing that Firaxis did a thousand percent right, it was to simplify and clean up the UI as it is one of the things that make 1994 XCOM almost unplayable in this day and age. Here it is just as clean but, again, with added details and complexity. You can now freely aim where your soldiers are aiming to target specific body parts or buildings. This is significant as it opens up for all sorts of tactical maneuvers that similar games often do not account for, things like shooting off limbs to limit an enemy's advance or deny them use of specific weapons. The more freeform aiming also lets you target things through cover and specifically try to destroy cover, a thing I have sorely missed in the modern wave of tactical strategy games. The premade team you deploy with is varied and interesting. There are, of course, some staples like the sniper and the heavy gunner. They work as expected: the sniper performances long range kills and the heavy gunner has machine guns and the ability to use a rocket attachment. There are, however, some new additions, like the medical unit that has two extra arms, Doctor Octopus-style, which can be used to either attack enemies or heal your soldier's health and body parts. Because, yes, the aliens you face can inflict damage to your body parts as well. If an arm is damaged, you can not use two-handed guns anymore. If a leg is mauled to shreds by a crab monster, you can forget about moving very far on your next turn and so on. It's nifty and leads to fighting being more visceral and tenser than just having your team members die or survive. Much like the game Battletech, there is a high probability you can come out of fights scarred and damaged instead of just dead, which I greatly prefer to games that depend upon you either doing things perfectly or not at all. Looking at you, XCOM 2, and your protracted death spirals. Again, hard to say how the actual balance will be with all systems at work but things look very promising. Another thing you have access to in battle is an armored car which you can let one or more of your soldiers enter and take control of. At the moment, it is very overpowered compared to what you encounter, but ramming full speed into the aliens, through walls and all, never gets old. I am really hoping that the finished game will have several interesting vehicles to make use of this one and lets the enemies do the same. The best feature of the tactical battle is, however, that you have more than two ability points. You can now move, shoot, reload, heal and move again in one turn, granted you have enough action points to do so. The two-action system which many games make use of, while simple, slowly drve me insane in Firaxis' XCOM. With the expanded abilities you simply have more tactical choices to make. Storywise, there is not much to tell yet. Some sort of virus was released from the permafrost that turned out to not only be deadly but also mutate people and animals to grotesque monstrosities. The creatures that you are facing look nasty and mean and I can not wait to find out more about them in the finished campaign. The developer, Snapshot Games, is also planning on incorporating the mutation aspect into the gameplay with enemies that will mutate and change depending on what tactics you use to kill them. The idea being, that enemies will mutate to gain different types of weapons and abilities in response to your playstyle. None of that is in the current build, however, but the enemies seem modular enough that I can see this happening. If it all pans out, it could be a fun way to keep things fresh through the campaign and hopefully, it's not just pallet swapping some crab monsters because you like to use rocket launchers instead of machine guns. Phoenix Point already plays really well and looks great, if a bit one-note - there are a lot of rust-colored ruins to fight your way through right now. With additional locations and if they can deliver on the features that are yet to be implemented, Phoenix Point is set to become something really special. In the end, like all strategy games, it comes down to how well the different systems jive with each other and if the AI can keep up enough to be interesting and pose a threat throughout the game. If you are a fan of XCOM or any tactical game for that matter, Phoenix Point is definitely something you should keep both eyes on.

Fire Mage: Wolcen Gameplay - Hack and Slash aRPG (Alpha - 2018) of Story of Game including Action, adventure, fighting, shooting, role play, graphics, theme and more stuff about game. Fire Mage: Wolcen Gameplay - Hack and Slash aRPG (Alpha - 2018) will feature the Full Game Story Campaign. Have fun watching these! Find out the recent trailer Fire Mage: Wolcen Gameplay - Hack and Slash aRPG (Alpha - 2018) for the 2018 gameplay below and see it for yourself. Hello PC gaming fans and welcome to Gameplay blog. This site is all about new PC gaming play trailer covering the whole game. This PC games on • Switch Nintendo Switch, • Windows, • PlayStation Vita, • PlayStation 1,2,3,4 • PC, • Wii U, • Xbox 360, • Xbox one and etc With official trailers and gameplay trailers and not forgetting regular live streaming new and old PC games. This video is just a small taster of what you will see ... ..Enjoy Gameplay of Fire Mage: Wolcen Gameplay - Hack and Slash aRPG (Alpha - 2018) Gameplay is the specific and particular way in which players interact with a game platform, and in particular with video games. Gameplay is the pattern defined through the game rules, connection, controller background and learn about strategies between player and the game, challenges and practice overcoming them. Plot and player's connection with it Video game gameplay is distinct from graphics way strategies and audio elements. This Site blog is created for the purpose of demonstrating gameplay, and providing tips on new and po[CENSORED]r games. Have fun watching these!

Nissan chairman Carlos Ghosn has been arrested over claims of financial misconduct, the carmaker has said. Mr Ghosn, a towering figure in the car industry, will be sacked from the Japanese firm after a board meeting on Thursday, its chief executive said. He has been accused of "significant actions of misconduct", including under-reporting his pay package and personal use of company assets. Nissan said it was unable to give further details on the offs. Japanese prosecutors have yet to comment on Mr Ghosn's arrest. Nissan is the world's sixth-largest carmaker and its site in Sunderland is the UK's largest car plant. "I feel despair, indignation and resentment." said Nissan chief executive Hiroto Saikawa at a news conference. "As the details are disclosed I believe that people will feel the same way as I feel today." Mr Saikawa said Nissan would now try to "stabilize the situation, and normalize day-to-day operations" for staff and business partners. It said it had been conducting an internal investigation for several months, prompted by a whistleblower. According to Japanese media reports, which have not been confirmed, he is under-reported an amount totaling 5bn yen (£ 34m) over a five-year period from 2011. Mr Ghosn was paid 735m yen (£ 5.1m) by Nissan in the most recent financial year, 227m yen (£ 1.6m) by Mitsubishi and € 7.4m (£ 6.6m) by Renault - a total of about £ 13.3m. Mr Saikawa said he believed the misconduct "went on for a long period". From 2010, Japanese firms have been required to distribute the salaries of executives who earn more than 100m yen. Carlos Ghosn: The driven "cost killer" Why car makers must adapt or die The carmaker added that it had been providing information to the Japanese Public Prosecutors Office and would continue to do so. Nissan said it also planned to oust senior executive Greg Kelly, who had been "deeply involved" in the misconduct. Mr Kelly - who has also been arrested, according to the firm - was described as a close aide to Mr Ghosn. Mr Saikawa said he was able to "exert influence" in the company. As well as being chairman of Nissan, Mr Ghosn is also chairman and chief executive of Renault and chairman of Mitsubishi Motors. Mitsubishi said it would propose the removal of Mr Ghosn as chairman. It said: "In response to the arrest of Ghosn, and since the alleged misconduct is related to a corporate governance and compliance issue, it is to be proposed to the board of directors to promptly remove Ghosn." In addition, he is chairman and chief executive of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Motors strategic alliance. Shares in Renault fell sharply after the news, dropping almost 10%. Renault said its board would meet "very shortly". Philippe Lagayette, a board member at the car giant, said the company was awaiting "prejudice information" from Ghosn and expressed its "dedication to the defense of Renault's interest" in its alliance with Nissan and Mitsubishi. Mr Saikawa said that Mr Ghosn had been given too much power making proper oversight difficult. "The problem of governance was significant. Looking back, after 2005 when he became CEO [chief executive] of both Renault and Nissan, we did not really discuss the implications," he said. Who is Carlos Ghosn? His hero status was so big that his life was serialized in one of Japan's famous cartoon comic books The Brazilian-born boss of Lebanese descent and a French citizen says his background left him with a feeling of being different, which helped him adapt to new cultures In France he was known as Le Cost Killer, a comment on the deep cuts he made to revive Renault He was once tipped as a potential president of Lebanon, a move he promptly dismissed because he already had "too many jobs" In a 2011 poll of people the Japanese would like to run their country Mr Ghosn came seventh, in front of Barack Obama (ninth) Carlos Ghosn profile: The driven "cost killer" 'Extremely vigilant' The French state owns 15% of Renault, which in turn holds a 43.4% stake in Nissan. French President Emmanuel Macron said the country would work to preserve the stability of Renault and its alliance with Nissan. "As a shareholder ... however, the French government will remain extremely vigilant regarding the stability of the alliance, the (Renault) group and ... its employees, who have the full support of the state." Mr Ghosn has been a titan of the motor industry for nearly 20 years. He was responsible for a dramatic turnaround at Nissan in the early 2000s when the car firm was on the verge of bankruptcy. Dubbed the "cost-killer" in the 1990s for slashing jobs and closing factories, his reputation was cemented after his strategy succeeded. Mr Ghosn began his career at Michelin in France, moving on to Renault. He joined Nissan in 1999 after Renault bought a controlling stake and became its chief executive in 2001. Mr Ghosn remained in that post until last year. The scandal comes just months after Mr Ghosn's € 7.4m pay package from Renault for last year was narrowly approved by shareholders. Analysis By Theo Leggett, business correspondent Carlos Ghosn is a towering figure in the motor industry. He has been credited with turning around both Renault and Nissan, before going on to become the linchpin of the Renault-Nissan Alliance. That Franco-Japanese axis, which also now includes Mitsubishi, is one of the world's largest carmakers. The question is what happens now. Mr Ghosn had already begun shedding some of his responsibilities - he stepped down as chief executive of Nissan last year, and recently offloaded some day to day responsibilities at Renault as well. But he was expected to remain chief executive of Renault and to continue in overall charge of the Alliance for the next few years. Today's announcements seem to undersine that strategy. It's not clear what Renault will now do. But plans for an orderly succession - and potentially the future future of the rather unwieldy Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi structure - may well have been thrown wide open.

size is different but i vote for v1 respected size and good blur

v1 text and blur