Snederevac1

AMD has been working closely with Microsoft on the upcoming DirectX 12 API, and it likes to show off once in a while how well its graphics cards will support some of those features. For example, there are the so-called "Asynchronous Shaders," which are a different way of handling task queues than was possible in older graphics APIs and is potentially much more efficient. In DirectX 11, there are two primary ways of synchronous task scheduling: multi-threaded graphics and multi-threaded graphics with pre-emption and prioritization, each with their advantages and disadvantages. Before we continue, we must clarify a couple of terms. The GPU's shaders do the drawing of the image, computing of the game physics, post-processing and more, and they do this by being assigned various tasks. These tasks are delivered through the command stream, which is the main command queue of tasks that the shaders need to execute. The command stream is generated through merging individual command queues, which consist of multiple tasks and break spaces.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9nA5JJ2Jo8

the most insane domino tricks u ever seen, enjoy

Bike Parkour -Streets of San Francisko, i didnt seen guys like this. just talented.

It doesnt move a bit even i see it very well like pulse said ...

im in the middle.

Just talented...

The tech world has finally coalesced around a charging standard, after years of proprietary adapters and ugly wall wart power supplies. Well, sort of: We’re already seeing some fragmentation in terms of the new USB-C connector, which could eventually replace USB, as well as what is thankfully turning out to be a short-lived obsession Samsung had with larger USB Micro-B connectors for its Galaxy line. But aside from that, and with the obvious exception of Apple’s Lightning connector, micro USB has destroyed the industry’s penchant for custom ports. Ten years ago, you always had to make sure you had the correct power supply for each of your gadgets. Usually, that power supply wasn’t even labeled. Today, you can charge your phone at your friend’s house, plug your Kindle into any computer, and download photos from a digital camera directly to your TV, all thanks to a standardized connector. In its place, though, there’s a new problem: USB power. Not all USB chargers, connectors, and cables are born equal. You’ve probably noticed that some wall chargers are stronger than others. Sometimes, one USB socket on a laptop is seemingly more powerful than the other. On some desktop PCs, even when they’re turned off, you can charge your smartphone via a USB socket. It turns out there’s a method to all this madness — but first we have to explain how USB power actually works.

Of course in Amercia Got Talent , are these 5 magicians follow their stunts , amazing...

Lenovo was kind enough to give us access to some of its new Broadwell-U powered noteboooks today, and we used the short time we had to run a few quick comparison benchmarks. The first of these is Lenovo's ThinkPad X250. At a svelte 20.3 mm in depth, it weighs less than three pounds and can be purchased with up to a 512 GB SSD or a 1 TB hard disk, with a 12.5" FHD 1080p screen. Powered by Intel's Broadwell-U Core i5-5200U processor and HD 5500 graphics, it's a good representation of the kind of product that we expect to replace previous-generation ultrabooks that run on the po[CENSORED]r Core i5-4200U, a processor found in a wide range of products including Lenovo's Yoga 2 Pro and Microsoft's Surface 3. In fact, we have included Yoga 2 Pro benchmark results in order to compare them. http://media.bestofmicro.com/P/1/472645/gallery/Thinkpad-X250_w_600.jpg The ThinkPad W550s, on the other hand, is a powerful workstation-class notebook armed with the new Core i7-5600U. It features a 15.5" IPS touchscreen with a 3k resolution, up to 16 GB of onboard RAM, and Nvidia's Quadro K620M professional discrete graphics chipset. Before we discuss the benchmark results, we'd like you to keep in mind that these tests were performed on pre-production prototype hardware with non-optimized BIOSes. It's likely that these products will be improved before they make their way to consumers. As final versions become commercially available in the [CENSORED]ure, we will bring you updated bench numbers.

Wireless networks have come a long way in the past 15 years. And yet, sustained WiFi speeds are still a vexing problem in a lot of situations. A number of things can come into play, such as the way your router is set up, whether there’s nearby interference, if you live in an apartment building or a separate house, and how far apart your devices are from the router. Fortunately, there’s always a way to fix slow transfer speeds. If you’ve ever messed around with your WiFi router’s settings, you’ve probably seen the word channel. Most routers have the channel set to Auto, but I’m sure many of us have looked through that list of a dozen or so channels and wondered what they are, and more importantly, which of the channels are faster than the others. Well, it turns out some channels are indeed much faster — but that doesn’t mean you should go ahead and change them just yet. Read on to find out more about 802.11 channels, interference, and the massive difference between 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi. Channels 1, 6, and 11 First of all, let’s talk about 2.4GHz, because as of the start of 2015, almost all WiFi installations still use the 2.4GHz band. 802.11ac, which debuted in 2013, is driving adoption of 5GHz — but thanks to backwards compatibility and dual-radio routers and devices, 2.4GHz will continue to reign for a while. All of the versions of WiFi up to and including 802.11n (a, b, g, n) operate between the frequencies of 2400 and 2500MHz. These paltry 100MHz are separated into 14 channels of 20MHz each. As you’ve probably worked out, 14 lots of 20MHz is a lot more than 100MHz — and as a result, every 2.4GHz channel overlaps with at least two (but usually four) other channels (see diagram above). As you can probably imagine, using overlapping channels is bad — in fact, it’s the primary reason for awful throughput on your wireless network. Fortunately, channels 1, 6, and 11 are spaced far enough apart that they don’t overlap. On a non-MIMO setup (i.e. 802.11 a, b, or g) you should always try to use channel 1, 6, or 11. If you use 802.11n with 20MHz channels, stick to channels 1, 6, and 11 — if you want to use 40MHz channels, be aware that the airwaves might be very congested, unless you live in a detached house in the middle of nowhere.

These are 5 "Apple" company darkest secrest i dont own any of these facts.

Welcome to CSBD! Enjoy your stay

Nvidia announced the GTX Titan X but didn't really offer much information about it. Today, we have all the juicy details we've been waiting for, as the green GPU maker announced more at the GTC (GPU Technology Conference). Inside the GM200 GPU that's aboard the GeForce GTX Titan X, you'll find a grand total of 3072 CUDA cores, which are spread out over 24 SMMs. Beyond the 128 CUDA cores that each SMM carries, they also carry eight TMUs, making for a total TMU count of 192. It also has 96 ROPs on board. The base frequency of the GPU is 1000 MHz, and it'll boost up to around 1075 MHz so long as the thermal headroom is available. Nvidia stated that the Titan X can handle 7 teraflops (SP) and 0.2 teraflops (DP). Naturally, the GPU is based on the Maxwell architecture, but it is still fabricated on the 28 nm lithographic process. Because it also has eight billion transistors on board, it's physically huge. In fact, it's 601 square mm huge, making it 9 percent larger than the GPU found in the original GTX Titan. The card in its entirety has a TDP of 250 W. On the card itself, you'll also find a majestic 12 GB of GDDR5 memory that runs at 7.0 GHz, which is addressed over a 384-bit memory interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of a respectable 336.5 GB/s. There's no backplate on the card. Finally, there's the price. The Titan X will land with a price tag of $999, which is about what one would have expected on the consumer side. http://media.bestofmicro.com/W/V/484591/gallery/titanx_front_w_600.jpg

Welcome to CSBD Have fun.

v1 text+blur