[Hardware] According to Intel, its Meteor Lake processors surpass AMD Phoenix

[FNX Magokiler]

We already have them here, the Meteor Lake are a reality, and to whet our appetites, Intel itself wanted to show us comparative tests regarding the competition, in this case pitting one of its models against another from AMD Phoenix, to show what they are. able.

Although to me personally it seems like it has a bit of a trick, but let's see everything and draw a conclusion together, and see what you think. We already have them here and soon we will be able to try it for ourselves.

Meteor Lake better than AMD Phoenix?
Specifically, the competing models would have been the Core Ultra 7 165H and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. Both supposedly of similar category, so it would show which one is superior in terms of technology and performance.

To do this, 33 games were compared, all at 1080p and medium quality, and the result, according to Intel, is 23 to 9, with one where they tied. We can even see 70% better performance in one of them. However, I'm going to leave you the image, and now we'll give you our opinion.

As we can see, it is true that in the games chosen by Intel, in the majority, its integrated graphics (Intel Xe-LPG) surpass those of AMD (Radeon 780M), however, these, as we say, would have been selected by the own company, so ours would not have to be entirely real.

What's more, if we go to the games where he really loses, we see titles like GTA V, PUGB or CS:GO 2, among others, that is, we are not talking about a small thing, and honestly.

 

 

With the expectation that there is for the future GTA VI, losing in the previous one does not give you a very good reputation.

In summary, it is true that we see an improved processor, very competitive, and that will stand up to AMD in many aspects, and possibly winning it in general, however, this table does not tell us much, simply that there will be games where it performs better and others where not, so, despite generally outperforming its competition, we are not talking about anything out of this world.

On the other hand, they claim that they have also made great progress in energy management, so we will really see how this is noticeable in the batteries of the equipment that runs it, and if this is really the case.

Intel claims that the 165H is an average of 11% faster than the 7840U, and 9% faster than the i7-1370P, so nothing, we will have to pay attention to real tests carried out by unofficial users, and see if it is really true, although, whatever the case, it is true that we see an improvement, and, to a greater or lesser extent, it is good news, let's see how they behave.

And you, what do you think of Intel's new processors and integrated graphics? Will they be up to par or will we have to wait another generation to really see something powerful? I think it's going to be half and half, we're going to like it, but they're going to fall a little short before the next models, which we hope won't take years.

 

https://hardzone.es/noticias/procesadores/intel-procesadores-meteor-lake-superan-amd-phoenix/