[Politics] Hamas announcement the return of its relationship with the Syrian regime.. Island Net monitors controversy within and outside the movement

[Mr.Bada]

Link

Observers consider that the transformation of Hamas in the past years into a political address of the Palestinian cause requires it to deal with a formula that differs from being merely a resistance organization, and this prompts it to deal with the balance and repercussions of political relations; however, the move towards the Syrian regime has received wide criticism and created anger among its supporters and even its members.Ramallah- "innocence".. That was a Facebook address of a former minister in the first Government formed by the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), commenting on the movement's decision to restore its relationship with the Syrian regime.

 

Under this title, Issa Al-Jabari, the Minister of Local Government of the Tenth Government, formed by Hamas after winning the 2006 Legislative Council elections, wrote "I am convoked to the Almighty by the decision of Hamas to restore its relationship with the criminal Syrian regime."

 

At the beginning of the statement of innocence, Al-Jabari pointed out that his decision was "to follow the approach of the Prophet Al-Mustafa ﷺ; to absolve himself from the ugly act, not from the actor in which there is much good

The position of Jabari was rejected by figures from within Hamas, in rare open disagreement.

 

His tenth government colleague, Minister of Public Works and Housing, Abdul Rahman Zidane, strongly opposed him and wrote that "the subject was killed by a debate at all levels, and in the end it is diligence, and the leadership has the right to appreciate interests." "After advice and decision, we say: hear and obey, and we don't keep flipping opinions, even if we're not convinced of justifications."

 

Commenting on Jabari's "Innocence", Bassem Zaarier, a member of the Legislative Council wrote the solution about the movement, "The unscrupulous and unscrupulous of our cause, and the contenders for our resistance did not leave us a choice." He continued, "Yes, in the hearts, there is a submersion, but the need and interest are driving you to reconcile a system that you have no vested interests."

 

Hamas announced last Thursday - in an official statement - the return of its relationship with the Syrian regime.

 

The movement confirmed "its progress in building and developing well-established relationships" with the Syrian regime, "within the framework of its decision to resume its relationship with brotherly Syria in the service of our nation and its just causes, and at the heart of which is the question of Palestine."

 

The Hamas leadership decided to leave Damascus in February 2012, about a year after the beginning of the Syrian revolution in March 2011. Since the announcement of the return of relations, the debate on social media platforms continues between a supporter and an opposition, both inside and outside the movement, Palestinian and Arab.

 

Hassan Khrisha, a member of the Independent Legislative Council for two consecutive sessions of the Council, defended the return of the relationship, considering it "normal, because Syria is the center of the triangle of the axis of resistance, and Palestine is the compass of the axis."

 

He saluted those who made the decision and encouraged him.. Friends and allies are known, and also the enemies of our people and the print people are known." Mohammed Abu Warda, Deputy Prime Minister of the Islamic University of the Islamic University of Gaza, said, said in his account on Facebook: "The return of relations with the Syrian regime does not understand the satisfaction of the movement, and does not last to support the movement for the policy of the regime within its land or towards His people."

 

"The return of relations is based on the Palestinian interest in resorting camps there, and a mentor for the return and liberal project."

 

The Jordanian writer Yasser Al-Za'ra, described, expressing his account on Tutir - the return of the relationship as "reflects the compass and in appreciation, as well as ignoring the feelings of the majority of the Palestinian people, including the sons of the movement"

With the views of the views of Hamas, they are justified, according to political analysts spoken to the island Net, who also have been to repercussions of the movement and region. Hamas was not surprising, but preceded him with the seizures and many meetings even with the Syrian regime and in Damascus.

 

He refers to efforts by Iran and Hezbollah and Russia to re-relationship, which reflects a wide desire for a large part of abroad and Gaza leaders, "despite the frequency of the Syrian regime and slow dealing with these attempts, as a result of the depth of the crisis in the past period."

 

As for the reasons for Hamas return to Syria, Shahin says it is geography that began to narrow more and more on the movement.

 

"Hamas is aware that the area of geography is narrowing, and that Earth pulls out of its feet, and began to see or diversify geography at least."

 

It indicates the impact of transformations in the region in terms of deepening normalization relationships from the one hand, and the hands under the axes at the regional level on the other.

 

Shaheen points out that the tight geography has conditions on the presence of Hamas in some countries; "This is reducing the scope of Hamas move if this is at the presence of military commanders, supply elements, military capacity development in Gaza and Lebanon," he said. In addition to Syria, Shaheen does not rule out a similar development in the relationship with Jordan. Here is another aspect and "go towards further pragmatism in the movement, which is the same as a major player in the Palestinian arena, perhaps at the region."

 

He concluded that Hamas realized the interests at the Arab and regional level and everyone to the Syrian regime and that if he did not apply a step behind everyone.

In turn, the Director of Tabos Consulting and Strategic Studies in Ramallah, Suleiman Bisharat, does not see the possibility of reading the return of relations between Hamas and the Syrian regime in isolation from a range of recent floors in the region.

 

"There is a reinforced factor group and pushed towards this step, the first to realize the Hamas - a national liberalism - should keep communication lines with any option that is available to her, and open to everyone, so as not to fall if political isolated from After which Arab and regional."

 

"Hamas" is masting the benefit of the political opportunity window, "and seek to take advantage of reinforcing the axis of the objection against the axis of normalization. The Hamas exit from Damascus and the movement of Arab revolutions has now changed; "Therefore, the previous decision can be re-evaluated from the forecast of developments for the future."

 

Bisharchers are shifted until the Hamas movement in recent years to a political address of the Palestinian issue requires them to deal with an equation that is just a resistive organization, and this is pushing them to deal with the political relations and its implications.

 

He said Hamas was holding an armed resistance option making it in need of an incubator's environment that is not provided by other political systems, despite its reception of the political leadership.

 

As for the beneficiary of the return of relations, Veri Bisharat that "profit equation and loss will not be a minute."

 

He adds that it is an early talk of the beneficiary, and the full return of a natural relationship or presence, "Pahmas can enhance its political presence as a reference to the Palestinian cause, in contrast to the Syrian regime to benefit from re-confidence in front of political currents Different, the area has been opened in front of Syria's internal reconciliation."