[News] What is in front of America and Europe to stop Russian?

[Love Pulse]

f

 

https://www.msn.com/ar-ae/news/featured/ماذا-أمام-أمريكا-وأوروبا-لإيقاف-روسيا؟/ar-AAUnPiw?li=BBqrI8k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last Friday, the Italian Prime Minister tried to contact the President of Ukraine, but was unsuccessful in making the call.

 

Mario Draghi tried to phone Volodymyr Zelensky, but the latter did not answer due to the repercussions of the conflict on his country a few days ago. "Draghi got angry," and then "Zelensky" sarcastically tweeted: "I will arrange my military agenda to respond to officials' communications from now on!"

 

The story of this contact summarizes the situation of the European Union regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.. Kiev believes that the European Union has let it down and abandoned it, and Brussels is concerned about the Russians, but it is also concerned about what Kyiv and behind it Washington and London may lead to by pushing the bloc countries towards escalation with Moscow over Several levels.

 

The European Union does not want to go to war with Russia on its territory for the sake of Ukraine or any other country. European memory is still groaning under the weight of the memory of the two world wars, and the bloc does not find itself obligated to defend a country that does not bear its membership or NATO membership, or at least Not as much as America and Britain claim.

 

The US and UK portray the Russian operation in Ukraine as an "invasion of the Old Continent" and that if it is not "thwarted" in Ukraine, it will "extend to all EU countries".

 

Far from the reality, the American exaggeration and exaggeration may lead to reactions that have ominous consequences. There are several countries in the European Union that are well aware of the American plan, and avoid keeping pace with the intimidation of the matter by it and Britain for certain purposes, so they leave the doors of dialogue open with the Russians, and face the repercussions of the conflict in ways Preserve the interests of the bloc and take into account the divergence of visions between its countries.

 

Brussels' interests conflict with confronting the Russians militarily over the territory of any country in the bloc. Its interests, too, may be at great risk if the Russians are "expelled" from the "Swift" system. Russia and the European Union have strong commercial relations, especially in the field of energy, and thus isolating Moscow economically will increase the burdens of Europeans and Russians alike.

 

So far, and for a possible long term, there is no alternative to Moscow as a source of natural gas to the European Union countries, and therefore its "expulsion" from the global clearing house "SWIFT" will confuse these countries in searching for ways to pay the dues of the blue fuel contracts with Russia... Not to mention that the gas The alternative would be more expensive and less stable for geographical, economic and political reasons as well.

 

The last European summit recognized this and tried to avoid sanctions, which might rebound on the union and its economies... All other options must be exhausted before resorting to this step, and dialogue with Moscow on Ukraine and all issues related to the security and economy of the old continent must also continue. They are the neighbors of the bloc, not Britain or America.

 

French President Emmanuel Macron called his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on the morning of the second day of the military operation between the two countries, and the Elysee Palace did not hesitate to announce the necessity of continuing dialogue with Moscow.

 

The movement of Russian tanks did not prevent that contact, nor did it prevent the German chancellor's appeal to President "Putin" to stop the military operation.

 

Washington itself does not want to “expel” Moscow from the “Swift” system, as the American steel industry depends on Russian energy.. This measure will also promote the use of global clearing as a weapon, which carries great risks because it will push Washington’s opponents to the alliance in one front to confront Western financial threat, the options are not nil.

 

For the West, it is much easier to “punish Putin” as an individual than “punish Putin as the leader of a great power.” They can freeze his bank balances and bank transfers, but it is difficult for them to stop his companies from exporting gas and oil, and much more difficult than that to paralyze his forces on the ground, or to attack His rule was overthrown by force.

 

The purpose of the British, the Europeans and the Americans is the same, which is to "thwart the Russian invasion of Ukraine". This task is either accomplished sooner by forcing "Putin" to withdraw his forces, or later by turning Ukraine into a pit for Russian forces... The third option is to make the consequences of the Russian military operation greater than its economic gains.

 

And because the first option is difficult for everyone, the second there are no guarantees of its success, and the third is tainted by major challenges that impede its rapid and effective implementation, the Europeans are looking for a fourth option that can be born through dialogue with the Russians...not in the language of threats spoken by the United States and the United Kingdom, but rather in the language of Clear understanding of the causes of conflict and addressing them seriously.