[Hardware] Prominent voting hardware company seeks to block docs from release in Santa Clara County court

[Angel of Death]

A voting hardware company that came to prominence right after last year’s presidential election is seeking to block Santa Clara County from releasing the firm’s financial documents, arguing they contain trade secrets that make them exempt from public records laws. On Thursday, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Helen Williams said she would like to first take a look at the documents in question before making a ruling. Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, which provides machines that counts votes and also allows individuals to cast their vote, became a household name in fall 2020 after an onslaught of conspiracy-driven accusations were directed at the company from former President Donald Trump and his supporters, who claimed the company had rigged the 2020 presidential election against him. In 2019, Santa Clara County awarded an eight-year contract to Dominion to utilize their technology for the county’s Registrar of Voters. As part of the contract process, Dominion provided 47 pages of audited financial statements from 2015 to 2017 to the county that were marked with the words “confidential” and “proprietary” on each page. In August, Santa Clara County received six public records requests that sought Dominion’s financial statements. As part of an agreement between the county and Dominion, the county notified the company about the records request and that they intended to fulfill it. After Dominion raised concerns about the release of the documents, the county directed them to make their case in court rather than the county making the determination. In their suit seeking to block the records from release, attorneys for Dominion argue that the company’s interest in preventing their release “outweighs” the public’s interest in receiving them. They also state that “across the nation,” individuals who are “fueled” by “false claims” that the company rigged the 2020 election have filed public records requests seeking information that intends to harm Dominion. In addition, attorneys for Dominion contend that it is in Santa Clara County’s own interest to not release the financial documents. If the documents were to be released, they argue, future vendors may be “reluctant” to work with the county. According to the suit, one of the requests was made by a “sovereign citizen” of so-called “New California,” a movement started in 2018 that looks to secede from the state. Dominion declined a request for comment, and the company’s lawyer and law firm did not respond to a request for comment. County Counsel James Williams said that in these cases, the county takes a “relatively neutral” position. “They need to go seek a court order. They are the ones who have the factual knowledge if they have a trade secret,” said Williams about companies seeking to block certain records from release. “We want to make sure the vendor isn’t going way overboard. We would object to that. Between them and the court, we aren’t in the position to know (what is a trade secret) given their particular industry issue.” Williams also said that an individual who wished to intervene in the case, Sunnyvale councilmember candidate Charlton M. Thornton, did not make an appearance. David Snyder, the executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, a San Rafael-based organization that advocates for government transparency, said that cases like the one involving Dominion and the county have become more common in the last half decade. In 2012, a state court of appeals ruled that a third party may challenge a request, known as a reverse-California Public Record Act lawsuit. That type of lawsuit was tested in 2017 when former Milpitas city manager Tom Williams, who had been accused of alleged misconduct, tried to prevent the release of records related to his tenure. A judge later ordered the release of the records after Snyder’s organization challenged Williams’ efforts to block the documents. “What a reverse action does (is) it flips the burdens,” said Snyder, who has led the Coalition since 2017. “The person who doesn’t want the records disclosed gets the first argument. And the most aggressive argument. The public’s interest in disclosure can be left out in the cold.”As for Dominion’s argument that their financial documents are trade secrets, Snyder said that just because a company puts the words “confidential” or “proprietary” on documents doesn’t legally dictate what a government entity can do with them. But the answer isn’t exactly clear, he said. “Trade secret is fairly narrowly defined in the law,” Snyder said, bringing up the formula for Coca Cola as an example. “If that were released, Coca Cola would be at a competitive disadvantage. Are audited financials secrets? I really don’t know. But I don’t think that’s an obvious yes.