Is what is happening in the Arab world troubling ... or does it exceed the danger?

[Love Pulse]

The rejected danger of what is happening in the Arab world is the transformation of those important parts of the Arab world into areas for the growth of ideological conflicts and the growth of populists, nationalities, and doctrines. This is the only result that will pose a real danger to the Arab region.

It is not possible to move beyond the stage that the Arab states went through, which toppled six Arab presidents, who are seven if we add to them Iraq with a different methodology, and the fact is that with a difference in how to analyze the causes and motives behind what happened, however a realistic reading of the events must be presented through questions A minute about that stage and what events can produce in the future. I do not think that any political researcher disagrees about an important fact that says that there is undoubtedly a catastrophic failure to build the Arab Republic. The systematic confusion between the name and the reality of the Arab Republic led to these results, which contributed to the demise Six Arab presidents during Less than a decade ago?

Perhaps the most obvious is that the recent protest experience, whether in Sudan or Algeria, may have benefited greatly from the experience of previous protest movements that occurred in seven Arab countries and have gone so far with six Arab presidents. Military institutions, whether in Algeria or Sudan, have learned with caution that preserving the state’s structure is important Very even if these institutions are forced to remove political leaders from power, this experience that seven Arab countries have experienced since the year 2010 AD, reflects that the problems brewing over time can lead to closed roads in the end to trying to build open political paths that can pass From x God.

The Arab political school during the past decades can be judged that it is not stable except for the monarchy, the satanic, and the old age, and there is a methodological and historical reason that supports the stability of these countries that have maintained the political experience based on comprehensive governance. The Arab peoples do not differentiate in terms of political awareness, they are close to a large extent, What distinguishes them are the ideological experiences and the political and populist slogans, but the royal experiences in all their forms remained the most capable of adapting to the modernist transformations, as the flexibility that characterizes the royal, sultanistic and Sheikhdom systems breaks before them every attempt Social and political confusion. National identities in non-republican Arab regimes were formed in two important dimensions, the national national dimension and the historical political dimension. The peoples in these countries were formed to be affiliated and deeply integrated with their political formations, socially, economically, and even ideologically. And modernity.

It is clear that the Arab political experience that passed through the Arab world during the past six decades and brought different systems has proven an important political fact saying: that these transformations that changed the political scene in most Arab countries under the framework of the republican theory were not the precise direction that could be built upon and from for the sake of The creation of Arab republics with stable political frameworks, those regimes were not actually stable and were always subject to disagreement. The entire Arab system paid the price for these incomplete transformations, and the Arab differences that we witness as a natural result of political transformations are either incomplete or incomplete. Mature, and the current outcome of the transformations of the Arab world was politically expected.

The question here says: Is what is happening in the Arab world troubling or dangerous? It is disturbing because the Arab experience is a recent era of emancipation from the empires, whether the Ottoman Empire or before it since the beginning of Islam, it has not completed after a century since it came under the path of international alliances that divided geography and wrote history as desired, and that happened after the First and Second World Wars. On the other side, there is deep and historical stability for a part of the Arab countries that have adopted political systems that have roots in the history of these peoples, as is the case in the Gulf states and the Arab monarchies that have distinguished and will continue to stabilize, but are the only candidate to practice the process of transferring the political experience in those countries to stages It is advanced because these countries have the historical foundations that make them able to effect transformation and exercise flexibility with actual participation with their peoples.

The rejected danger of what is happening in the Arab world is the transformation of those important parts of the Arab world into areas for the growth of ideological conflicts and the growth of populists, nationalities and denominations. This is the only result that will constitute a real threat to the Arab region whose stability has become an international task that requires a correct reading of the political and economic reality in which they live. Today, eight Arab countries are becoming stable, starting in Iraq and ending in Sudan.