Devino Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 In striking evolution and may be dropped for the positions of President Donald Trump from a private Israeli-Palestinian conflict issues, especially the settlement, which he considered during his election campaign and immediately after receiving the judgment that it is not an obstacle to achieving peace between the two parties. n the first interview to the newspaper "Israel Today" Hebrew with US President Donald Trump in which he discussed a number of issues, including the settlement, where he was to seize new lands for settlements would not be good for peace. The newspaper has published some excerpts from the interview, which was conducted by the newspaper delegate to Washington journalist Boaz Basmut Friday, to be published by the full newspaper next Sunday, and the interview touched on the upcoming meeting between Prime Netanyahu and Minister of Israel with Trump, and the transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem and nuclear agreement with Iran and the peace process in the region and bilateral relations with Israel. This highlighted what he said in these cases was explained below: In response to a question about the settlement and the position of his administration who believed that the settlements are not an obstacle to peace Do discuss this with Netanyahu, he said, "I have left over limited land, and every time you grab a new land for the benefit of the settlement is shrinking Palestinian land, and I am one of those who believe that the expansion of the settlement policy is not good for peace, however, we are examining all options. " On the press for the transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem question the US president said, "I ask Israel to deal sensibly with the peace that came his chance after a long time, which may be a broader and more comprehensive Palestinian-Israeli peace only, I want both sides to work reasonably well, and we have a reasonable ways to it, "and here the journalist responded: what about the transfer of the embassy, where he said" I'm thinking on this subject, and I study this subject and we will see what will happen, this is not an easy decision, I have discussed this issue for many years, it did not provide any someone to take this decision, and I study this matter very seriously. " With regard to the meeting expected with Netanyahu and his position on Israel and how to deal with it, especially in the part condemn Israel said, " I do not. I'm not going to condemn Israel for the duration of my presidency, enough is received from condemnation and has a difficult history of convictions, I am Israel fully understand and support her, the Israelis passed in attack is very difficult, I want peace between Israelis and Palestinians and working on that, I think that peace for the Israelis would be great, not just good, "and Netanyahu said," he is the Prime Minister is working in favor of Israel and peace, and that Atvhmh well and understands the various concerns particularly with regard to Iran, which he considered real danger to Israel, adding that he was always understood Netanyahu and his relationship with him is very good. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts