Jump to content
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'benchmark'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Hosting & Development
    • [CSBD] Discord
    • Rules, Feedback & Suggestions
    • Community development
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Staff & Projects Apply
    • Report center
  • Public Servers
    • Counter-Strike 1.6
  • Projects & Competitions
    • Devil Harmony
    • Social Musician
    • Music
    • Media
  • Devil's Club
    • Journalist
    • Social
    • Special days
    • Free time
  • Design
    • GFX Designers
    • Assistance
    • Galleries & Gifts
    • Competitions
  • World of Games
    • VGame Reviewers
    • Game Platform
    • Technology Era
    • Social Media
    • Offers, recommendations & giveaways

Product Groups

  • CSBD PREMIUM
  • CSBD HEAVENLY
  • CSBD STAFF RANK

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Facebook


Yahoo


Skype


Website URL


Twiter


Instagram


YouTube


Steam


Interests


City


Member Title

Found 1 result

  1. Graphics enthusiasts are salivating for news around AMD's pending Navi graphics cards, and new Credit: CompuBenchtest results from a mysterious AMD GPU listed in the CompuBenchdatabase have spurred a new round of speculation. Several media outlets have reported that the GPU is an AMD Navi engineering sample, but after closer inspection, it appears this sample likely isn't of the Navi variety. The new graphics card has poor compute results compared to Vega 64 and Vega 56, but its graphics performance isn't too far behind the Vega 64. It even beats the Vega 56 in some tests. As Navi is expected to be a low-end or mid-range GPU, on the surface, this seems like a good sign the GPU is indeed Navi. Eagle-eyed Redditors noticed that the Vega 56 fell far behind both the alleged Navi GPU and Vega 64 in CompuBench's ocean surface simulation benchmark. This ocean simulation benchmark, for example, is very memory bandwidth heavy; Vega 56 only has about 85 percent of the bandwidth of Vega 64, and not even half that of the Vega VII. The alleged Navi GPU's performance may come down to memory bandwidth and not graphical prowess, which is the first indication that this may not be a Navi GPU at all, but a Vega 20 GPU instead. The "66AF" GPU, thought to have been Navi, is actually registered under Linux AMD GPU drivers as "Vega 20," making the Navi conclusion even more suspect. Also, comparing this 66AF:F1 GPU to Radeon VII on CompuBench, nearly everything in the OpenGL information is identical. A notable difference is that Vega VII has an additional tag under "GL_EXTENSIONS" called "GL_AMD_gpu_shader_half_float2," which may be the tag that specifies Vega VII's reduced floating point performance compared to other Vega 20 GPUs, like the Radeon Instinct MI60. While it is hard to tell what exactly this GPU is, if Linux's driver IDs can be trusted, it doesn't appear to be Navi. Even if the GPU is from the Navi lineup, it's hard to glean useful performance data and GPU specifications due to the nature of the CompuBench benchmark. For now, it appears more likely this is just another Vega 20 GPU, perhaps even a new WX Pro series model. Article created by „tomshardware”.

WHO WE ARE?

CsBlackDevil Community [www.csblackdevil.com], a virtual world from May 1, 2012, which continues to grow in the gaming world. CSBD has over 70k members in continuous expansion, coming from different parts of the world.

 

 

Important Links