Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2369.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=forma

Manchester United are reviewing their options for matchday travel following the late arrival of the team coach because of traffic congestion for Tuesday night’s defeat to Juventus in the Champions League.

United may also be fined by Uefa following two pitch invasions during the 1-0 defeat.

United were late for the previous Group H match with Valencia after problems with traffic, causing the game to kick off five minutes later than scheduled.


Manchester United’s shambolic investments lack a grand design
 Read more
Before that match they stayed at the squad’s usual pre-game hotel, the Lowry in Salford, which is just under three miles away. The late arrival caused the club to switch to the Hilton Garden Hotel at Old Trafford cricket ground for Tuesday’s match.

Yet while the Hilton is less than half a mile from United’s stadium the coach still took around 55 minutes to arrive, having left at 6.15pm. José Mourinho, the manager, opted to leave the vehicle and walk the final part of the journey to the ground.

The Juventus game was not subject to a major delay but did kick off two minutes late.

Greater Manchester police are unable to offer United an escort as the force would then be compelled do so for every other team. There are roadworks currently around Old Trafford and once these are over the problem of heavy traffic may be eased.

The club, though, are still to review matchday travel options. It will also do so regarding security protocols after the pitch invasions. The first occurred when one person entered the field during the first half of the defeat, the second at the end of the tie, when two people ran on to the pitch.

Uefa are awaiting the official match report. If these incidents are included United are set to be sanctioned, with a fine most likely.

Since you’re here…
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our reporting as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help.

The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

Our journalism is increasingly funded by our readers – thank you for your support. Less than three years ago we had 200,000 supporters; today we have been supported by over 900,000 individuals from around the world. Hundreds of millions read The Guardian’s independent journalism every year but less than 1% of them help fund it. Our long term future will only be secure if we’re able to keep growing this relationship.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.