[[Template core/front/profile/profileHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Everything posted by Revo
-
my vote goes to DH2 , i like it more than DH1
-
-
Renault has confirmed that it will launch a new version of the po[CENSORED]r 5 as an electric hatchback, which is set to go on sale in the future as part of a major new plan to revive the firm’s fortunes. The new Renault 5 Prototype takes styling and design cues from the Clio’s predecessor that Renault produced from 1972 to 1996. It's set to be one of 14 new models – including seven fully electric vehicles – that the French brand will launch by 2025. Although unconfirmed, reports suggest it will be joined by a new electric version of the Renault 4 supermini in the firm’s future line-up. The French firm revealed the machine during the unveiling of the ‘Renaulution’ strategic plan devised by new boss Luca de Meo this morning. The 5 Prototype city car will be a key part of Renault’s push for 30% of its sales to be of electric vehicles by 2025. De Meo, who during his time at Fiat was key in reviving the 500, said: “I know from experience that reinventing a cult products lights a fire under the whole brand. This is a cult vehicle at a price many can afford. And this is only the beginning for the whole Renault brand.” The Renault 5 Prototype is an electric-only model, with a design that features numerous references to various versions of the original 5, including the cult classic Supercinq and R5 Turbo versions, albeit given a modern EV twist. The front headlights are modelled on the original design, while there's a front-mounted EV charging port located where the radiator grille was placed on the original. Renault design chief Gilles Vidal said: “The design of the Renault 5 Prototype is based on the R5, a cult model of our heritage. This prototype simply embodies modernity, a vehicle relevant to its time: urban, electric, attractive.” Renault has yet to confirm when the production version of the Concept 5 will go on sale or give full technical specifications. The showcase features wider rear wheel arches and a red stripe livery that nods to the R5 Turbo hot hatch, hinting at the prospect of a high-performance version of the new model. Beyond the commitment to launch seven new EVs worldwide by 2025, no timeline has been given for when the 5 EV might go into production. Described as a city car, the model could replace the hugely successful Zoe EV as the firm’s compact electric hatch, and which would likely be due for replacement around then. Renault last year revealed the Mégane eVision, an electric SUV that will go into production next year as the first car built on the CMF-EV platform. The original Renault 5 was launched in 1972, designed to fill the sizeable gap between the Renault 4 and the Citroën 2CV in the French small car market. Renault engineers were given a brief to develop a small car that would meet the needs of the widest range of the French car buying public possible. The final design remained close to the original sketches from designer Michel Boue, with a slightly unconventional design. Under the bodywork, the R5 used many of the mechanicals from the Renault 4 and Renault 6 and featured front-wheel-drive with a choice of two engines. The car was a huge hit: by 1980, it was one of the best-selling cars in the world. In 1976, it also spawned the Renault 5 Alpine (branded the 5 Gordini in the UK), one of the world’s first true hot hatches. That was followed in 1980 by the R5 Turbo, a cult classic rally homologation special that featured a mid-mounted turbocharged engine in the passenger compartment behind the driver. The second generation of the 5, known as the Supercinq, was launched in 1984 with a revised look and built on a new platform. It was effectively replaced as Renault’s lead supermini by the Clio, which was launched in 1990, although the Supercinq remained on sale in some markets until 1996.
-
Lady Gaga’s makeup brand Haus Laboratories has deleted its latest eyeliner ad. The ad, which was shared on Instagram, was criticised for being “triggering”. The now-deleted video featured a micro-tip liquid eyeliner that was shown being used to draw slashes on a model’s inner arm, reported Independent. “That’s really triggering to me to be honest…,” a social media user wrote, according to a screenshot captured by today.com. “Maybe you should reconsider how you want to present this… I’ve been through a lot and this really brings me back to when I was self-harming, and I’m only a year and a half clean.” Some people also reportedly suggested that the brand should have included a trigger warning with the post. “I think you should use a trigger warning for self-harm on this… it really is triggering,” another person was quoted as commenting. Neither Lady Gaga nor the makeup brand has responded to the backlash yet. Previously, the Rain on Me singer had spoken about battling PTSD and resorting to self-harm. “I like to say I used to cut as opposed to saying I am a cutter. I also used to throw myself against the wall. I used to do some horrible things to myself when I was in pain,” she had said.
-
Rabat – Moroccan sheikh Hassan Ali El Kettani has angered Amazigh activists in Morocco again, attacking them for celebrating Amazigh New Year, also known as Id Yennayer. January 12 was the first day of the Amazigh (Berber) calendar. The year 2021 marks the Amazigh people’s 2,971st New Year. Public figures, senior officials, and Amazigh activists expressed joy and pride about celebrating the Amazigh New Year, which angered El Kettani. The sheikh took to social networks to oppose celebrations, saying that the “so-called” Amazigh New Year “does not exist.” He said that it is not appropriate for a Muslim, who believes in God, to celebrate the Amazigh New Year. The tweet received backlash, with citizens lashing out at the preacher. “Plurality is everywhere, in life and even in the Quran, except in the minds of radical Muslims,” one Twitter user said. The statement angered many Amazigh activists who find remarks from El Kettani controversial and expressive of hatred against their culture. Read Also: Id Yennayer: Celebrating the Amazigh New Year Mounir Keiji, one of these Amazigh activists, told Morocco World News he condemned the statements. He said El Kettani’s remarks did not “stir controversy among Amazigh activists only, but all Moroccans.” The activist said that not everyone has the same ideologies as El Kettani. “El Kettani is known for his controversial remarks against Amazigh and Tamazight (the Amazigh language),” Keiji said. He added that some Islamists have several ideologies regarding the Amazigh that contradict the country’s constitution. The Amazigh activist expressed satisfaction with how Moroccans across the country and abroad celebrated Id Yennayer. “Everyone celebrated the event. You can notice that through social networks,” Mounir Kieji said. When Morocco World News asked the activist whether he thinks the government’s actions and efforts to promote Amazigh culture and traditions are enough, the activist said “la vie is not always en rose.” He called for more efforts, but also expressed hope to see all the Amazigh people’s demands fulfilled, step by step. One of the demands is to turn the Amazigh New Year into a national holiday. People celebrate Id Yennayer across Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Western Egypt. In 2018, Algeria turned January 12 into a national holiday to celebrate Id Yennayer. Since then, calls from Amazigh activists mounted, urging Morocco’s government to make Id Yennayer an official holiday. In 2019, Amazigh activist and President of Moroccan news outlet “Alalam Al Amazighi” (Amazigh World), Amina Ben Sheikh, addressed a message to King Mohammed VI calling for the recognition of the Amazigh New Year as a public holiday. Ben Sheikh said that “recognizing the Amazigh New Year as an official national holiday side by side with the other national holidays would restore the spirit and philosophy of the Constitution.”
-
[Battle] Filex Dragneel vs Meh Rez vM [ Winner Filex ]
Revo replied to Filex Dragneel's topic in Battles 1v1
DH1 , i like the song & the rhythm -
[DH Battle] Loenex Vs Filex Dragneel [ Winner Filex ]
Revo replied to _Happy boy's topic in Battles 1v1
DH1 , i liked the music -
my vote goes to DH1 , i liked the song and the rhythm too
-
Accepted ! DH1 DH2
-
DH1 : 5votes DH2 : 2votes @R E V O- the winner
-
Our CPU benchmarks performance hierarchy ranks all the current and previous generation processors, including all of the Best CPUs for Gaming, based on performance. Your CPU has a huge effect on overall performance and, to many, is a computer's most important component. CPU benchmarks help us suss out the differences, but when it comes time to buying a CPU for your desktop, you'll find a dizzying collection of model numbers and specs from both Intel and AMD. We've listed our the best CPUs for gaming and best processors for work in other articles, but if you want to know how each chip stacks up against all the others and how we come to our decisions, this CPU benchmark hierarchy is for you. We also recently added a new article covering the CPU benchmark hierarchy for Cyberpunk 2077, which is a dedicated piece to show performance scaling in the most hotly-anticipated game in recent history. We recently added the Ryzen 5 5600X, Ryzen 9 5950X, 5900X, and Ryzen 7 5800X to our rankings, along with all of the previous-gen Zen 3, Zen+, and Zen 1 versions of those chips. These new processors represent a watershed moment for AMD: The company has swept our benchmark hierarchy and taken the lead in every metric, including our gaming, single-threaded, and multi-threaded categories. We are busily retesting our full arsenal of processors. We will re-rank them with our latest tests and hardware, but for now, we have split the latest results for each category (gaming, single-threaded, and multi-threaded) into two different listings. One is listed as "Post-Zen 3," and the other is listed as "Pre-Zen 3." We're using different tests and a newer version of Windows 10 to measure performance in the new rankings, so the two lists aren't directly comparable. This applies doubly-so for the gaming hierarchy, as we are now using an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 for gaming tests, which is significantly faster than the old 2080 Ti we used previously. For now, we've only tested 21 processors in the Post-Zen 3 era, but you can use the old table of results to get a rough sense of how the newly-tested processors compare to the un-retested models. We'll transition to a single table for each category once we've reached a tipping point in the number of processors tested. We're working on that endeavor full time. We'll explain how we ranked the processors under each table. The game testing ranking is first. We also include an application performance metric in our application score tables, which we've split up into single- and multi-core measurements (below gaming table). Make sure to check the Post-Zen 3 rankings for all three categories. The most powerful chip gets a 100, and all others are scored relative to it. If you want our recommendations for specific price bands, please check out our Best CPUs for gaming page. We previously only listed 1080p game rankings, but we've now added 1440p testing into the mix. As such, we have two rankings for each chip, and the chart is aligned sequentially based on the 1080p game results. However, the 1440p listings aren't listed in sequential order due to unfortunate limitations with our tables. Pay attention to the 1440p rankings: Some faster chips at 1440p may be listed below slower chips simply because of the 1080p results. We measured performance for the 1080p games from a geometric mean of Borderlands 3, Far Cry 5, Hitman 2, Project CARS 3, Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and The Division 2. We measured performance for the 1440p games from a geometric mean of Borderlands 3, Far Cry 5, Flight Simulator 2020, Project CARS 3, Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and The Division 2. As you can see, AMD's Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X take a healthy lead over Intel's flagship Core i9-10900K in both 1080p and 1440p results, and as you'll see in our Ryzen 9 5950X and 5900X review, overclocking can't even the score for Intel. The stock Ryzen processors beat the overclocked Intel processors, which is quite the feat, and Ryzen is even faster after overclocking, too. Also, check out those performance deltas between the previous-gen Ryzen processors compared to the 5000 series. That's impressive. Most folks overlook the incredible power efficiency of the Zen 3 processors, but that equates to a faster, cooler, and quieter system that doesn't require super-expensive cooling solutions. Take note of the TDP divide in our charts - it's surprising. Check out our review for more in-depth power testing. *indicates an APU tested with a discrete GPU. Note: These types of processors are geared for performance with integrated graphics - please see individual reviews for those performance rankings. This is our Pre-Zen 3 rankings, which you can use to gauge relative rankings compared to the table above this one. We've ranked all the consumer Intel 10th, 9th, 8th, and 7th Gen processors, along with AMD's Ryzen and Threadripper chips from all four generations. We determined the order in the first table based on a geometric mean of gaming performance in four titles: Grand Theft Auto V, Hitman 2, Final Fantasy XV, and World of Tanks. We used the Nvidia GTX 2080 Ti GPU for our tests at HD resolution. We have also included several newer processors that we haven't tested yet, but we've assigned them basic positions in our hierarchy based on their capabilities. This list will soon be absorbed into the Post-Zen 3 rankings as we test more chips. You may be surprised to find that some less-expensive chips ranked above their upscale siblings. For example, the Core i7-9700K comes out ahead of the Core i9-9900K on this list because it offers better performance in some games due to its lack of hyperthreading, which was enough to help it do better on the overall suite of tests. However, depending on the application, you may see stronger results from the higher-end chip. We calculate the above single-threaded rankings based on a geometric mean of y-cruncher, Cinebench, POV-Ray, and LAME. The latter consists of two tests: One short duration test and one extended duration test to measure performance once Intel's boost duration limits have been exceeded. Single-threaded performance is often tied directly to the responsiveness and snappiness of your PC in any number of daily applications, like loading an operating system or surfing the web. This metric largely depends upon a mixture of instruction per cycle (IPC) throughput (the number of operations the chip can execute in one clock cycle) and frequency, which is the speed at which the transistors switch between on and off states. However, a whole host of other considerations, such as cache, architecture, and interconnects (like rings, meshes, and infinity fabric) impact this measure of per-core performance, so these results do not align perfectly based upon clock frequency. Instead, performance varies with each application and how well it is tuned for the respective architectures. With all that said, the delta between Intel's flagship Core i9-10900K and the Ryzen 5000 processors is incredible - at worst, Ryzen 5000 is 10% faster in single-threaded performance. This is our Pre-Zen 3 single-threaded ranking, which you can use to gauge relative rankings compared to the newer table above this one. We generated the single-threaded metric via a geometric mean of performance in single-threaded LAME, Cinebench, POV-Ray, and y-cruncher applications, giving you a good idea of performance in everyday desktop PC applications. The multi-threaded workload column is based on performance in Cinebench, POV-ray, vray, Blender (four tests - Koro, Barcellona, Classroom, bmw27), y-cruncher, and Handbrake x264 and x265 workloads that represent performance in productivity-focused applications that tend to require more compute horsepower. Like we see with single-threaded performance metrics, multi-threaded performance, which is a measure of a chip's performance in applications that utilize multiple software threads, varies based upon a whole host of architectural factors. It also depends heavily upon how well the software scales with additional compute cores. As such, these results do not align perfectly based upon core/thread count, though it does serve as a decent litmus of multi-threaded performance. Be aware that architectures, caches, and interconnects profoundly impact these results, as all of these factors impact how well performance scales with additional threads. Performance rarely scales perfectly with the addition of more cores/threads, so the scaling factor of each processor architecture weighs in heavily on the value proposition of going with a higher core count processor for your specific application. It's noteworthy that both Ryzen 5000 chips beat out Intel's 18-core 32-thread Core i9-10980XE, and the Ryzen 9 5900X only comes with 12 cores. Again, pay attention to TDP - the Ryzen chips have a 105W ranking while Intel is specced at 165W. This is our Pre-Zen 3 single-threaded ranking, which you can use to gauge relative rankings compared to the newer table above this one. The multi-threaded workload column is based on performance in Cinebench, POV-ray, vray, Blender, y-cruncher, and Handbrake x264 and x265 workloads represent performance in productivity-focused applications that tend to require more compute horsepower. The Threadripper rankings need a bit of explanation. With an industry-leading slathering of core counts, these processors offer the utmost performance in many different threaded workloads, but can suffer in some less-demanding desktop PC-class applications that either don't utilize the cores and threads fully, or aren't optimized for the architecture. That reduces the gap separating the rankings in the mainstream applications we use for this list, but in many cases, you can see much larger deltas with specific applications. You should view individual reviews and our best processors for applications list for a better sense of how those processors fare in professional workloads. Legacy Desktop Processor Benchmark Hierarchy Recognizing that a lot of older platforms are going to be paired with graphics subsystems multiple generations old, we wanted to define the top of our range to encourage balance between host processing and complementary GPUs. At this point, anyone with a Sandy Bridge-based Core i7 would realize a gain from stepping up to Coffee Lake or Kaby Lake, for example. And putting AMD's top FX CPUs next to a handful of Core i7s and those older Core i5s represents an upgrade to their status. Currently, our hierarchy consists of 13 total tiers. The bottom half of the chart is largely outdated; you'll notice those CPUs dragging down performance in the latest games, regardless of the graphics card installed in your PC. If you own a CPU in that range, an upgrade could really take your experience to another level. Really, it's the top five tiers or so that remain viable. And in that top half of the chart, an upgrade is typically worthwhile if it's a least a couple of tiers higher. Otherwise, there's just not enough improvement to warrant the expense of a fresh CPU, motherboard and RAM (not to mention the graphics card and storage solution you'd be considering as well). Legacy Desktop Processor Hierarchy
-
AMD's most powerful processor the Threadripper Pro will soon be available to purchase as the chipmaker's exclusivity deal with Lenovo has come to an end. The new CPU first appeared in Lenovo's ThinkStation P620 workstation but now motherboard vendors have begun showing off some of their latest models that support AMD's WRX80 chipset at CES 2021. Threadripper Pro offers a number of benefits compared to the non-Pro variant of AMD's CPU including support for eight-channel memory, 2TB DRAM and up to 128 x PCIe 4.0 lanes. We've put together a list of the best mobile workstations These are the best business laptops on the market Looking for something more powerful? Check out the best workstations The AMD WRX80 chipset offers increased bandwidth as it supports eight-channel memory and all of the new motherboards designed for it can be outfitted with 2TB of DDR4 LRDIMM memory as well as both ECC and non-ECC memory at DDR4-3200. WRX80 motherboards So far Supermicro, Asus and Gigabyte are the first device makers to unveil their new WRX80 motherboards designed for Threadripper Pro. The Supermicro M12SWA-TF E-ATX motherboard features an all-black PCB and includes eight horizontal memory slots that can be filled with up to 1TB of DDR4-3200 ram. The motherboard supports AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro processors up to 64 cores and even the entry-level variant of the chip that comes with 16 cores. Due to this motherboard's large size, it features six full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slots with support for two triple-slot or three dual-slot GPUs. The Asus WRX80 Pro Sage SE WiFi is another motherboard model that has been specifically designed for Threadripper Pro. While Asus has yet to release additional details on the board itself, based on a picture from VideoCardz it uses seven full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slots with eight memory slots. It also features an all black PCB and WiFi 6. Another leaked motherboard set to be released with the launch of Threadripper Pro is Gigabyte's WRX80 SU8. This motherboard includes eight memory slots for eight-channel memory as well as seven full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slots. As Threadripper Pro is AMD's most powerful processor yet, expect these motherboards to end up in workstations built and designed for professionals who can utilize the additional memory and PCIe slots.
-
Nickname : @R E V O- Tag your opponent : @Meh Rez vM ! ♫ Music genre : french rap Number of votes ( max 10 ) : 6 Tag one leader to post your songs LIST : @Meh Rez vM ! ♫
-
DH1 : 4votes DH2 : 2votes @R E V O- the winner
-
Cancelled.
- 1 reply
-
- 2
-
-
Volkswagen has issued a voluntary update of 56,000 examples of the Mk8 Golf to fix software problems that have plagued the new model. Autocar has received confirmation that of the cars affected worldwide, 7,400 UK customers will be notified of the “voluntary service measure”, which is different from a recall as it not mandatory and can be completed during a regular service. It's focused on examples built before July 2020, and fixes software issues affecting the infotainment system and reversing camera. The launch of this Golf - which is more reliant on technology and digital interfaces than any previous variant - had to be delayed in 2019 while engineers worked to fix software development problems. Deliveries were then halted in May 2020 due to issues with its emergency call system, which resulted in customer cars being stored for up to a month until a fix was found. Software problems also plagued the rollout of Volkswagen's new ID 3 electric hatchback. Despite numerous issues and the latest software problems, customer demand for the Golf hasn’t waned. Some 312,000 examples were registered in Europe last year, making it 2020’s best-selling car there, and it was the number-one seller in its home market of Germany.